If I don’t set the recipient table, what’s the trouble?
Thanks
On 2024-10-30 21:05, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 08:57:32PM +0800, Adriel via Postfix-users
wrote:
I have another question. Suppose I have two domains: foo.com and
bar.com.
Both point to an M
Dear Postfix folks,
We use an external company for managing job applications. We set up the
domain jobs.molgen.mpg.de as an alias, and the domain is used in email
addresses for sending and receiving emails.
$ host jobs.molgen.mpg.de
jobs.molgen.mpg.de is an alias for cs-balancers-1.b
Dear list,
I have another question. Suppose I have two domains: foo.com and
bar.com. Both point to an MX server: mx1.sample.com. However, on
mx1.sample.com, I want to route bar.com's emails to mx2.sample.com,
because mx2.sample.com has the complete user database for bar.com, and
mx2.sample.co
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 08:57:32PM +0800, Adriel via Postfix-users wrote:
> I have another question. Suppose I have two domains: foo.com and bar.com.
> Both point to an MX server: mx1.sample.com. However, on mx1.sample.com, I
> want to route bar.com's emails to mx2.sample.com, because mx2.sample.c
Dear.
Here is link.
https://csi.cloudmark.com/en/reset/
___
Best Regards Andriy Pachkovskyy
Mob. tel. +48504122924
Mob. tel. +380679421834
Sip tel. 220...@lviv-ua.com
Email:ap...@lviv-ua.com
Jabber: ap...@lviv-ua.com
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 16:48:04 +0800
Adriel via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-10-30 09:48:
Some of my messages were rejected by cloudmark CSI though the message
content was totally valid. Do you know this BL provider? Is it a
reliable one? Thank you.
logs ?
CSI gives an reject message to follow sorting out, but end users cant,
s
If you have Cloudmark in your system you will see...
11:30:51.091 5 EXTFILTER inp(105): 2757 ADDHEADER "X-Junk-Score: 69 [XX]\eX-SpamCatcher-Score: 69 [XX]\e (100%)\tBODY: likely
offers spam"
11:30:51.091 4 EXTFILTER [5414373] ADDHEADER(X-Junk-Score: 69 [XX]\nX-SpamCatcher-Score: 69 [XX]\n (
APach via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-10-30 17:35:
https://csi.cloudmark.com/en/reset/
the reject messages is more correct, your help is here bogus, sorry
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Adriel via Postfix-users:
> If users are added in main MX, how can they be synchronized to backup MX
> for relay access?
Use Postfix recipient addres verification.
https://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#recipient
This populates a valid recipient address cache on the remote MX.
Adriel via Postfix-users:
> Some of my messages were rejected by cloudmark CSI though the message
> content was totally valid. Do you know this BL provider? Is it a
> reliable one? Thank you.
Isn't that an **IP based*** reputation service?
Wietse
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 02:14:26PM +0100, Paul Menzel via Postfix-users wrote:
> We are using DANE, but of course the external service provider does not.
> Internally I configured the tls_policy *dane-only* for
> molgen.mpg.de/.molgen.mpg.de which of course leads to trouble in this
> situation. To
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 09:11:13PM +0800, Adriel wrote:
> If I don’t set the recipient table, what’s the trouble?
You'll accept mail to non-existent recipients, which will later bounce,
and if spam and perhaps a joe-job, will annoy the forged senders and
damage the reputation of your system. Als
On 2024-10-31 01:44, APach via Postfix-users wrote:
If you have Cloudmark in your system you will see...
11:30:51.091 5 EXTFILTER inp(105): 2757 ADDHEADER "X-Junk-Score: 69
[XX]\eX-SpamCatcher-Score: 69 [XX]\e (100%)\tBODY: likely offers spam"
11:30:51.091 4 EXTFILTER [5414373] ADDHEADER(X-Ju
Some of my messages were rejected by cloudmark CSI though the message
content was totally valid. Do you know this BL provider? Is it a
reliable one? Thank you.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
14 matches
Mail list logo
