[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
What I am looking for is pretty simple. How to get it to work with "inet_protocols = all" like my existing server is currently set up to do and not be limited to ipv4 only. And it is already set to use 127.0.0.1 so why it is using [::1] instead when the old server uses 127.0.01, that is part o

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Alexander Leidinger via Postfix-users
Am 2024-06-28 09:01, schrieb Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users: What I am looking for is pretty simple. How to get it to work with "inet_protocols = all" like my existing server is currently set up to do and not be limited to ipv4 only. And it is already set to use 127.0.0.1 so why it is using

[pfx] Roundcube question

2024-06-28 Thread Jeff Peng via Postfix-users
Does one roundcube installation support only one SASL backend? For example I configure it to access aol then it cannot access gmail. Other webmail such as snappy can connect to many smtp/imap backends, such as yahoo/outlook/gmail, they can be set up in one installation. Thanks ___

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
On 28.06.24 02:01, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote: What I am looking for is pretty simple. How to get it to work with "inet_protocols = all" like my existing server is currently set up to do and not be limited to ipv4 only. simply allow receiving messages from ::1 on port 10025. 10025

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
Dnia 28.06.2024 o godz. 00:16:31 Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users pisze: > When "inet_protocols = all" the connection to filter.mynetwork.local > localhost > port 10025 to hand off the message to spamassassin for scanning fails with > "Relay access denied". What I finally noticed is that the connec

[pfx] Re: Roundcube question

2024-06-28 Thread Dimitris via Postfix-users
Στις 28/6/24 12:14, ο/η Jeff Peng via Postfix-users έγραψε: Other webmail such as snappy can connect to many smtp/imap backends, such as yahoo/outlook/gmail, they can be set up in one installation. roundcube does the same as snappy , by manually editing config.inc.php (iirc). eg...: $config[

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Peter via Postfix-users
On 28/06/24 19:01, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote: What I am looking for is pretty simple. How to get it to work with "inet_protocols = all" like my existing server is currently set up to do and not be limited to ipv4 only. And it is already set to use 127.0.0.1 No it is not, it is s

[pfx] Re: Roundcube question

2024-06-28 Thread Gary R. Schmidt via Postfix-users
On 28/06/2024 19:14, Jeff Peng via Postfix-users wrote: Does one roundcube installation support only one SASL backend? For example I configure it to access aol then it cannot access gmail. Other webmail such as snappy can connect to many smtp/imap backends, such as yahoo/outlook/gmail, they ca

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Bill Cole via Postfix-users
On 2024-06-28 at 05:23:27 UTC-0400 (Fri, 28 Jun 2024 11:23:27 +0200) Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users is rumored to have said: Who exactly listens on port 10025? looks like postfix sends mail to itself, or is it another postfix instance? Historically that has been a port commonly used

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
Thank you, Alexander, Matus, Jaroslaw, Peter, and Bill, just the kind of ideas I was looking for. My old postfix server is running 2.11 and I have not dealt much with postfix really since then because like I said it just worked, did what I needed it to do. Currently I'm working with 3.9 and I

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users
* Curtis J. Blank via Postfix-users: > What I am looking for is pretty simple. How to get it to work with > "inet_protocols = all" like my existing server is currently set up to do > and not be limited to ipv4 only. Well, you seem to be in a good mood. ;-) > And it is already set to use 127.0.

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
Always in a good mood. It's a waste not to be. When I'm focused on something I just state the facts as I understand them and sometimes that doesn't come across well. Yeah I know localhost can be either that's why I used 127.0.0.1 in the config and don't/didn't use localhost anywhere, as I late

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
A bit off topic but it just happened to dawn on me that that Ethernet Tap I referred to was a H4000. My brain works that way. Just to see if my memory hadn't failed me I googled it. Yep H4000. And I even found a Wiki page on it with a picture of the backbone cable and the H4000. And the tool to

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Peter via Postfix-users
On 29/06/24 03:17, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote: Well Peter all the "mynetworks =" that I have defined explicitly state 127.0.0.1 not localhost and all the logging shows 127.0.0.1 not localhost. So that is why I say I am using 127.0.0.1. So I cannot follow Ralph's suggestion changing

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Peter via Postfix-users
On 29/06/24 05:59, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote: Always in a good mood. It's a waste not to be. When I'm focused on something I just state the facts as I understand them and sometimes that doesn't come across well. Yeah I know localhost can be either that's why I used 127.0.0.1 in th

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
Peter, my  misunderstanding, sorry. This is what I discovered today in my testing. I explicitly used 127.0.0.1 and not localhost or so I thought, I explain that below. Back on topic. I did some more testing. This was the spampd options used: SPAMPD_OPTIONS="--host=localhost:10025 --relayhost=lo

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
Yeah I thought of including the config but that OP was long due to all the logging so I didn't want to make it longer. I did say in my OP I would provide anything if requested. -Curt On 6/28/24 21:11, Peter via Postfix-users wrote: On 29/06/24 05:59, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote: Al

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
OK I tired this. What "mydestination" is set to does not matter whether it's localhost or 127.0.0.1 if spampd is set to use localhost and not 127.0.0.1 it will not work. So I'm convinced that was the root cause of my problem, spampd set to use localhost when postfix is set to use 127.0.01 expl

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Peter via Postfix-users
On 29/06/24 15:16, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote: Peter, my  misunderstanding, sorry. This is what I discovered today in my testing. I explicitly used 127.0.0.1 and not localhost or so I thought, I explain that below. Back on topic. I did some more testing. This was the spampd options

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
I don't know how  many times now I have said this but I will day it again. I have postfix set up to only listen on/use  127.0.0.1 *not* ::1. And. I am not using spamd, it listens on port 783. I am using spampd which shows up as perl because is it written in perl and it listens on 10025. Here

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Peter via Postfix-users
On 29/06/24 18:09, Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users wrote: I don't know how  many times now I have said this but I will day it again. I have postfix set up to only listen on/use  127.0.0.1 *not* ::1. What postfix listens on is irrelevant, this has to do with which IP postfix connects to spamp

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

2024-06-28 Thread Curtis J Blank via Postfix-users
No I am not confusing inbound and outbound and for this I'm only concerned about inbound and actually only on ports 10024-26 that are for lack of a better way to put it a customization. -Curt postconf -Mf smtp   inet  n   -   n   -   -   smtpd submission inet  n   -