* Tan Mientras via Postfix-users:
> Trying to setup email REJECT when users try to send to a no-reply
> email.
Personally, I find this type of one-way communication annoying and
impolite. The same goes for setting Reply-To to your personal email
address after asking for help on a public mailing l
On 19/06/24 18:51, Tan Mientras via Postfix-users wrote:
Hi
*Trying to setup email REJECT when users try to send to a no-reply email.*
There is no such thing as a no-reply email, there is no part of the
email specification that allows a message to be marked as unable to be
replied to. Many
Hi,
Personally, I find this type of one-way communication annoying and
impolite. The same goes for setting Reply-To to your personal email
address after asking for help on a public mailing list.
Like you did yourself?
From: Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users
Reply-To: Ralph Seichter
Regard
On 19/06/2024 18:19, Bjoern Franke via Postfix-users wrote:
Hi,
Personally, I find this type of one-way communication annoying and
impolite. The same goes for setting Reply-To to your personal email
address after asking for help on a public mailing list.
Like you did yourself?
From: Ralph
> On 19 Jun 2024, at 4:29 PM, Gilgongo via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > The defaults for those settings, as far as postfix is concerned, are as
> > follows:
> >
> > smtpd_tls_auth_only = no
>
> Why? Surely, "yes" is the better choice...
>
> You need to set this to "yes" if you plan to have ac
On 2024-06-16 15:21, Cody Millard via Postfix-users wrote:
> smtpd_helo_restrictions =
> ...
> reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname,
> ...
I've found this to block some legitimate mails in the past from Bank of
America, so you may want to grep your logs for "Helo command rejected:
Host not fo
On 2024-06-19 02:27, Matt Kinni via Postfix-users wrote:
> On 2024-06-16 15:21, Cody Millard via Postfix-users wrote:
>> smtpd_helo_restrictions =
>> ...
>> reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname,
>> ...
> I've found this to block some legitimate mails in the past
Sorry, I meant "reject_unknown
On 2024-06-19 17:29, Matt Kinni via Postfix-users wrote:
On 2024-06-19 02:27, Matt Kinni via Postfix-users wrote:
On 2024-06-16 15:21, Cody Millard via Postfix-users wrote:
smtpd_helo_restrictions =
...
reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname,
...
I've found this to block some legitimate mai
On 2024-06-19 Jeff Peng via Postfix-users wrote:
> On 2024-06-19 17:29, Matt Kinni via Postfix-users wrote:
>> On 2024-06-19 02:27, Matt Kinni via Postfix-users wrote:
>>> On 2024-06-16 15:21, Cody Millard via Postfix-users wrote:
smtpd_helo_restrictions =
...
reject_non_fqdn
Mornin'
|# Error reporting
error_notice_recipient = postmaster@email.broker
#https://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#error_notice_recipient
notify_classes = bounce, delay, policy, protocol, resource, software
#https://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#notify_classes
|
The above will insure many
Hi,
I was reading the SASL_README, "The ldapdb plugin" at:
https://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#auxprop_ldapdb
[quote]
Tip: [...snip...] Instead, you can use "saslauthd -a ldap" to query the
LDAP database directly, with appropriate configuration in
saslauthd.conf, as described here. [
Gary R. Schmidt via Postfix-users:
[reply-to header]
> He didn't do it - it's being added by Mailman. Whether by default or
> deliberately I do not know.
This is damage control for DMARC. The mailing list address goes in
the From: header, and the poster's email address goes in Reply-To:
so that l
* Bjoern Franke via Postfix-users:
> From: Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users
> Reply-To: Ralph Seichter
Dang, blindsided by Mailman 3, sorry. What I wrote about my dislike of
using "nore...@foo.bar" type addresses remains unchanged, however. If
sender A sends mail to recipient B, A needs to be p
On 2024-06-19 Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote:
> * Bjoern Franke via Postfix-users:
>
> > From: Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users
> > Reply-To: Ralph Seichter
>
> Dang, blindsided by Mailman 3, sorry. What I wrote about my dislike of
> using "nore...@foo.bar" type addresses remains unchan
Rob Sterenborg (Lists) via Postfix-users:
> Hi,
>
> I was reading the SASL_README, "The ldapdb plugin" at:
>
> https://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#auxprop_ldapdb
>
> [quote]
> Tip: [...snip...] Instead, you can use "saslauthd -a ldap" to query the
> LDAP database directly, with approp
It appears that Peter via Postfix-users said:
>On 19/06/24 18:51, Tan Mientras via Postfix-users wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> *Trying to setup email REJECT when users try to send to a no-reply email.*
>
>There is no such thing as a no-reply email, there is no part of the
>email specification that allows a
* Ansgar Wiechers via Postfix-users:
> [...]
Did I ever send mail to you using the mailing list address you got
barred from targeting, or send mail to you at all from my servers? No,
I did not.
You tried to initiate communication by sending mail to an address you
had no reason to contact, this b
Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users:
> * Ansgar Wiechers via Postfix-users:
>
> > [...]
>
> Did I ever send mail to you using the mailing list address you got
> barred from targeting, or send mail to you at all from my servers? No,
> I did not.
>
> You tried to initiate communication by sending mai
Hello
does smtp have an action "discard"? if so where messages will be
discarded?
I see smtp code has "reject" while sieve has "discard". So I am asking
this question.
Thank you.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsub
On 20/06/24 04:35, John Levine via Postfix-users wrote:
It appears that Peter via Postfix-users said:
On 19/06/24 18:51, Tan Mientras via Postfix-users wrote:
Hi
*Trying to setup email REJECT when users try to send to a no-reply email.*
There is no such thing as a no-reply email, there is n
does smtp have an action "discard"? if so where messages will be discarded?
I see smtp code has "reject" while sieve has "discard". So I am asking this
question.
http://www.postfix.org/header_checks.5.html
There is a DISCARD action.
___
Postfix-users
postfix--- via Postfix-users:
> > does smtp have an action "discard"? if so where messages will be discarded?
> > I see smtp code has "reject" while sieve has "discard". So I am asking this
> > question.
>
> http://www.postfix.org/header_checks.5.html
> There is a DISCARD action.
Also in http://
> On Jun 19, 2024, at 7:13 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> postfix--- via Postfix-users:
>>> does smtp have an action "discard"? if so where messages will be discarded?
>>> I see smtp code has "reject" while sieve has "discard". So I am asking this
>>> question.
>>
>> http://w
So many replies!
@Ralph
Is an automated/unattended email notifying the user about something,
providing proper ways of contacting. As this email is not read in any way,
rejecting the mail would be a better way to handle than an automatic
response. IMHO.
@Peter
My /etc/postfix/no-reply_reject conta
Got some news!
When sending emails from my domain (to my domain), rejection IS applied
(and message displayed to the client MUA)
When sending emails from Office365, rejection is shown in the logs, but
message is considered sent for the client (no message)
Is this meaningful for you?
On Thu, Ju
On 20/06/24 17:47, Tan Mientras via Postfix-users wrote:
So many replies!
@Ralph
Is an automated/unattended email notifying the user about something,
providing proper ways of contacting. As this email is not read in any
way, rejecting the mail would be a better way to handle than an
automatic
Am 2024-06-20 08:21, schrieb Peter via Postfix-users:
On 20/06/24 17:47, Tan Mientras via Postfix-users wrote:
So many replies!
@Ralph
Is an automated/unattended email notifying the user about something,
providing proper ways of contacting. As this email is not read in any
way, rejecting the
27 matches
Mail list logo
