On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 14:32:06 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> * Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users :
> > Mar 17 11:38:31 localhost postfix/smtpd[22150]: lost connection after
> > STARTTLS from list.sys4.de[2a03:4000:10:51d:b8ce:63ff:feca:a5a0]
> > Mar 17 12:09:10 localhost postf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 2023-09-17 at 15:24 +0200, Herbert J. Skuhra via Postfix-users
wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 14:32:06 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users
> wrote:
> >
> > * Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users :
> > > Mar 17 11:38:31 localhost postfix/smtp
In my case, all STARTTLS commands fail. Delivery succeeds after re-connecting
with plaintext.
Apparently, not all connections are retried in plaintext.
To work around one could say:
smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps = cidr:{
{188.68.34.52 starttls}
{2a03:4000:10:51d:b8c
STARTTLS should be back to normal again. My tests suceeded and I'll give it
another shot when I'm home. At the moment I'm on a rather longish train ride
and internet is shaky - at best.
Yesterday we upgraded LE certs and it seems – we haven't had time to
investigate in that yet – SELinux bite Post
On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 06:20:53PM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Yesterday we upgraded LE certs and it seems – we haven't had time to
> investigate in that yet – SELinux bite Postfix where it shouldn't.
> Astonishingly SELinux has been running like that for 193 days and th
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 09:38:49AM +1000, Phil Biggs via Postfix-users wrote:
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net/2022-October/002556.html
>
> Ah, just saw this but it's getting way beyond my skill level :-)
>
> Does that invalidate the bug report?
The change in error number and
Monday, September 18, 2023, 10:01:51 AM, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 09:38:49AM +1000, Phil Biggs via Postfix-users wrote:
>> > https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net/2022-October/002556.html
>>
>> Ah, just saw this but it's getting way beyond my
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 10:31:59AM +1000, Phil Biggs via Postfix-users wrote:
> >From what I could understand, it seems the recommendation was to return the
> same value as Linux. Is that something postfix would need to take into
> account? It also seems to be informational only.
The real int
