On 16/04/2023 05:57, tom--- via Postfix-users wrote:
> Intentionally at the request of web.de it seems. Did you read:
>>
>> https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL175032
>>
>> If your message was blocked, and was not spam, contact:
>>
>> https://postmaster.web.de/en/case?c=uar
>
> I sent em
It appears that tom--- via Postfix-users said:
>$ dig -x 82.165.159.35 +short
>mout-xforward.web.de.
>
>Can anyone from web.de help with this?
The only people who should be able to send mail through that server are web.de
customers.
If you are a customer, what happened when you contacted them t
> one of web.de's sender IPs is listed into zen.spamhaus.org as the following
> info.
>
> 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [82.165.159.35] blocked using z
> en.spamhaus.org; https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL175032
Try to send your email via web.de (browser), which might use server
> John Levine via Postfix-users :
> [...]
> If you are a customer, what happened when you contacted them through
> their customer support channels and asekd for the support you are
> paying for?
Web.de is a german freemail provider like gmail.
They might provide support for paid accounts only.
Okay, Viktor! I executed these commands and got this result:
$ dnsname=mailserver.mail.lan
$ rm certkey.pem
rm: Unable to delete 'certkey.pem': No such file or directory
user@mailserver:~$ openssl req -new -nodes -newkey rsa:2048 -keyout /dev/stdout
\
-config <(printf 'distinguished_name=
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 06:03:09PM +0300, Oleksandr via Postfix-users wrote:
> Okay, Viktor! I executed these commands and got this result:
>
> $ dnsname=mailserver.mail.lan
> $ rm certkey.pem
> rm: Unable to delete 'certkey.pem': No such file or directory
> user@mailserver:~$ openssl req -new -no
> Did you reconfigure Postfix to use the generated PEM file
> as your certificate and private key file?
I didn't know it had to be done...
I just do what you recommend.
How do I need to do this reconfiguration?
Please tell me about this in more detail.
And another question: do these commands hav
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 07:49:00PM +0300, Oleksandr wrote:
> > Did you reconfigure Postfix to use the generated PEM file
> > as your certificate and private key file?
>
> I didn't know it had to be done... I just do what you recommend. How
> do I need to do this reconfiguration? Please tell m
I think I've followed all your instructions, and now I've got another mistake:
Apr 16 21:20:29 mailserver postfix/smtps/smtpd[2496]: warning: No server certs
available. TLS won't be enabled
Apr 16 21:20:30 mailserver postfix/smtps/smtpd[2496]: connect from
unknown[192.168.8.144]
Apr 16 21:20:30
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 09:24:09PM +0300, Oleksandr wrote:
> I think I've followed all your instructions, and now I've got another
> mistake:
That means that either my instructions had a typo, or your
implementation of correct instructions had a typo.
> Apr 16 21:20:29 mailserver postfix/smtps/s
> You now need to again post your configuration settings. Post the output
> of:
>
# postconf -nf smtpd_tls_cert_file smtpd_tls_key_file smtpd_tls_chain_files
# ls -l $(postconf -xh smtpd_tls_cert_file smtpd_tls_key_file
smtpd_tls_chain_files)
# grep -E '^-(BEGIN|END) ' $(postconf -x
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 10:05:02PM +0300, Oleksandr wrote:
> > You now need to again post your configuration settings. Post the output
> > of:
> >
># postconf -nf smtpd_tls_cert_file smtpd_tls_key_file smtpd_tls_chain_files
># ls -l $(postconf -xh smtpd_tls_cert_file smtpd_tls_key_file
>
Dear Viktor,
I'm is an old grandfather, and I'm already not thinking straight in Linux and
I'm confused about these adjustments.
But I very need to get this stubborn and also old Videocam to work :-)
You have already helped me a lot in solving this problem, for which I thank you
very much!
If it
Dnia 16.04.2023 o godz. 16:32:41 Gerald Galster via Postfix-users pisze:
>
> Mails classified as spam or external forwards seemingly take another route
> via mout-xforward.web.de. These servers are SBL-listed by intention, most
> likely because the spam probability is higher in this context. This
It appears that Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users said:
>Dnia 16.04.2023 o godz. 16:32:41 Gerald Galster via Postfix-users pisze:
>>
>> Mails classified as spam or external forwards seemingly take another route
>> via mout-xforward.web.de. These servers are SBL-listed by intention, most
>> likely b
Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users:
> Dnia 16.04.2023 o godz. 16:32:41 Gerald Galster via Postfix-users pisze:
> >
> > Mails classified as spam or external forwards seemingly take another route
> > via mout-xforward.web.de. These servers are SBL-listed by intention, most
> > likely because the spam p
> Wietse Venema via Postfix-users :
>
> Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users:
>> Dnia 16.04.2023 o godz. 16:32:41 Gerald Galster via Postfix-users pisze:
>>>
>>> Mails classified as spam or external forwards seemingly take another route
>>> via mout-xforward.web.de. These servers are SBL-listed by i
Hi, I have more info and I try to explain it better:
First of all I have smtputf8_enable = no (disabled).
I have several databases related with several mysql_virtual maps:
- Some with utf8 + utf8_general_ci collation
- Another ones with latin1 + latin1_spanish_ci.
I'm using mysql-postfix (mys
18 matches
Mail list logo
