Dnia 6.11.2021 o godz. 16:56:01 li...@lazygranch.com pisze:
> Note a few of the spammers put their email address in the subject line.
> Maybe that should be my first attempt at discarding. I can't think of a
> non-spammer doing that.
Some MUAs do. I use mutt, and if you forward a message in mutt,
Hi,
try to reject mail that contains a Reply-To with GMail in it. Easy to set,
minimal to no false-positive potential.
And see if that comes near the effect you want.
My observation is that it matches around 90% of the typical Googemail spam.
ps. GMail is the #1 spam/scam facilitator for years
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 21:03:34 -0400
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > I have run the jq script for a week or so ($days = 5) and it works
> > like a charm :-)
>
> You're welcome. Of course if the number of days will never vary in
> your case, it would be simpler to just hard-code the number into the
> jq
There are times when you get temporary blocked and the message has to be
delivery.
For those cases, hold is a great tool. I do use HOLD for yahoo deliveries
very often.
BR,
R
Em qui., 28 de out. de 2021 às 06:12, Bastian Blank escreveu:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 10:39:52AM +0200, richard lucasse
Where did Viktor come from...
Definitely not from this Earth.
This is the kind of knowledge that comes from Mars...
For more humans like you here... cheers!
Em sex., 5 de nov. de 2021 às 22:04, Viktor Dukhovni <
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> escreveu:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 12:32:14AM +0100, ric
Let me know if you need any help.
[]s
Em sáb., 6 de nov. de 2021 às 10:31, Curtis Maurand
escreveu:
>
> Perfect. That was the other solution I had been looking at.
>
> ==C
>
Yes I can, but only if you send me the config files you want the results
for.
It will be a pleasure.
Em sáb., 6 de nov. de 2021 às 12:28, Viktor Dukhovni <
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> escreveu:
> > On 5 Nov 2021, at 5:14 pm, Rafael Azevedo wrote:
> >
> > POSTFIX logs using DOCKER non-chrooted an
> On 7 Nov 2021, at 3:08 pm, Rafael Azevedo wrote:
>
> Yes I can, but only if you send me the config files you want the results for.
> It will be a pleasure.
I'm afraid there aren't any "config" files I can send you.
I had assumed that you know or can find out how to temporarily
disable AppArmor
On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 07:00:12PM -0400, post...@ptld.com wrote:
> > My expectation is that dovecot is not involved in this issue, but I'm
> > not sure, so I mention anyway that that I have set
> >
> > virtual_transport = dovecot
>
>
> Dovecot has the same setting: recipient_delimiter = +
>
On 06/11/2021 23:34, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> On 6 Nov 2021, at 3:43 pm, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
>>
>> In main.cf I have set
>>
>> recipient_delimiter = +
>>
>> Reading the docs, I don't see anything else I ought to set for this to
>> work: postfix should first try delivery to jeff+post...@p27
On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 04:39:34PM -0300, Rafael Azevedo wrote:
> This is the kind of knowledge that comes from Mars...
The `jq` interpreter is a rather handy tool. It is is worth learning if
you spend enough time working with JSON data. No Martian passport
required, just enough incentive and c
>> Dovecot has the same setting: recipient_delimiter = +
>> In the logs, is the mail being rejected by postfix or by dovecot
>> after postfix tries to deliver?
> I'm not 100% sure: I suspect dovecot because the error occurs talking
> on the pipe to dovecot.
>
> postfix/pipe[3889979]: A0BCEA0FEB:
On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 09:51:09PM +0100, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
> > j...@p27.eu j...@p27.eu
>
> I added it to virtual, where it did not exist.
>
> > and make sure to remove (not include) "virtual" in:
> >
> > propagate_unmatched_extensions = canonical
> >
> > the default setting inc
13 matches
Mail list logo
