Hi,
If you'd like to point DANE at your postfix server,
today might be a good day to look into it. If not,
please ignore the rest of this post. And apologies if
this is all old news to you.
If you use Debian stable, and ISC Bind, it has just
become really really easy to implement DNSSEC for your
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 06:12:04PM +1000, raf wrote:
> If you use Debian stable, and ISC Bind, it has just
> become really really easy to implement DNSSEC for your
> domain(s).
Indeed, BIND 9.16 makes it dramatically easier to sign your DNS zone and
keep it signed reliably. It automates ZSK roll
We have been getting inundated by spam from Google (gmail).
I know that if our server gets reported for even a few spammy messages, Google
won’t hesitate to block our server.
Short of blocking Google on our server, is there some place to report spam we
have received from the Google platform?
S
> On 17 Aug 2021, at 5:13 pm, SH Development
> wrote:
>
> We have been getting inundated by spam from Google (gmail).
>
> I know that if our server gets reported for even a few spammy messages,
> Google won’t hesitate to block our server.
>
> Short of blocking Google on our server, is there s
> On Aug 17, 2021, at 2:13 PM, SH Development
> wrote:
>
> We have been getting inundated by spam from Google (gmail).
>
> I know that if our server gets reported for even a few spammy messages,
> Google won’t hesitate to block our server.
>
> Short of blocking Google on our server, is the
On 2021-08-17 23:35, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Yes, but I doubt it would have any meaningful effect. :-(
hope google can do better with dkim reports, not accepting reports with
brokken dkim signs from google :/
You can (with much manual effort) fill in Google's abuse report form:
htt
What's the matter with ab...@google.com and at spamcop.net?
On 2021/08/17 17:35 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On 17 Aug 2021, at 5:13 pm, SH Development wrote:
We have been getting inundated by spam from Google (gmail).
I know that if our server gets reported for even a few spammy messages,
I have set up a postfix/dovecot/roundcube server on an Ubuntu box.
Everything works fine *except* that my personal account on that machine
cannot send mail to another account I have on a different machine.
Instead, it's delivered back to the sender.
Specifically, if the account fp...@libertyfp.o
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 12:35:40PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 06:12:04PM +1000, raf wrote:
>
> > If you use Debian stable, and ISC Bind, it has just
> > become really really easy to implement DNSSEC for your
> > domain(s).
>
> Indeed, BIND 9.16 makes it dramaticall
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:18:08PM -0400, fp145 wrote:
> Aug 18 02:58:09 libertyfp postfix/lmtp[11706]: D0C4941E97:
>to=, orig_to=,
>relay=mail.libertyfp.org[private/dovecot-lmtp], delay=0.96,
>delays=0.91/0.02/0.02/0.01, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0
> +TFjIyFbHGG7LQAAHPmxyw S
Google does not honor abuse addresses, or spamcop.
Which makes it the #1 scammer paradise.
Greets,
Ludi
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org Im
Auftrag von Vince Heuser
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. August 2021 02:06
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: Goog
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 07:27:38AM +0200, ludic...@gmail.com wrote:
> Google does not honor abuse addresses, or spamcop.
>
> Which makes it the #1 scammer paradise.
The key problem is that email accounts are free, and the 419 scammers
are not bots, and so it is difficult to prevent them from op
Yes, many of them are regular GUI users.
But also many of them do the same scheme for years now, sometimes for long
periods with the same accounts.
Like the notorious "Maria Elisabeth Schaeffler" mass scam every day.
I do not believe Google does not know what goes on. They just don't care.
Othe
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 12:43:55AM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> > sender_dependent_relayhost_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/bysender
>
> Whatever, not directly relevant to your problem...
>
> > and here's what's in /etc/postfix/bysender
> >
> > % more bysender
> > *@gmail.com [mail.billoblog.com
Is there an easy way to tell postfix to send a copy of every message it
receives to a “shadow server” in a way that preserves the SMTP envelope? I’m
trying to tune a spam filter on actual data, but I don’t want to do it on my
production server because the tuning is likely to break things.
Than
Le mercredi 18 août 2021 à 14:32 +1000, raf a écrit :
>
> It would be great if certbot supported multiple simultaneous
> certificates
> for a domain, so that the next certificate could be ready in advance.
> Then pre/post/deploy hooks could take care of everything fairly
> easily.
> But I might ha
16 matches
Mail list logo
