Hi Viktor,
thanks for your reply.
>
> I am not sure what you mean by "disables QNAME-minimisation
> automatically", but if it is on by default, and subject to some sort of
> dynamic fallback, I strongly recommend that you instead disable it
> *statically* (always off), or set a very small limit
Subject: How to Host Multiple Mail Domains (Email Hosting) in iRedMail
Full Featured Linux Mail Server
Author: Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming (TARGETED INDIVIDUAL)
Country: Singapore
Date: 3rd May 2021 Monday
Type of Publication: PDF Manual
Document Version: 20210503.01
***IMPORTANT NOTICE**
Hi,
I have a postfix-3.5.10 system and am trying to process mail prior to
it being forwarded to another domain that has multiple MX records.
Many years ago I used fallback_relay in master.cf but now it appears
to be referenced as smtp_fallback_relay?
I don't understand the syntax for adding multip
I am making my own policy service:
userpolicy unix - n n - 0 spawn user=mail
argv=/usr/libexec/postfix/per-user-policy
Which is called in smtpd_recipient_restrictions with
check_policy_service.
Per the SMTPD_POLICY_README it accepts inputs then replies with actions
and an empty line.
Everyth
Alex:
> Hi,
> I have a postfix-3.5.10 system and am trying to process mail prior to
> it being forwarded to another domain that has multiple MX records.
> Many years ago I used fallback_relay in master.cf but now it appears
> to be referenced as smtp_fallback_relay?
It has been renamed for clarity
post...@ptld.com:
> I am making my own policy service:
> userpolicy unix - n n - 0 spawn user=mail
> argv=/usr/libexec/postfix/per-user-policy
>
> Which is called in smtpd_recipient_restrictions with
> check_policy_service.
> Per the SMTPD_POLICY_README it accepts inputs then replies with action
I get the impression from the SMTPD_POLICY_README and the access.5
pages
that you can respond with multiple actions before ending with an empty
No, where does it say so?
Wietse
http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html -> Other Actions -> PREPEND:
"Prepend the specified message header t
post...@ptld.com:
> >> I get the impression from the SMTPD_POLICY_README and the access.5
> >> pages
> >> that you can respond with multiple actions before ending with an empty
> >
> > No, where does it say so?
> >
> > Wietse
>
>
> http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html -> Other Actions -> P
Using Linux, postfix, dovecot.
For sorting incoming mail into different maildir folders, i know general
advice is to have postfix deliver to dovecot instead of maildir, and use
dovecot sieve to deliver the mail into a user's sub-folder.
Is there anyway within postfix (or policy service) to de
On 2021-05-04 at 14:55:29 UTC-0400 (Tue, 04 May 2021 14:55:29 -0400)
is rumored to have said:
Using Linux, postfix, dovecot.
For sorting incoming mail into different maildir folders, i know
general advice is to have postfix deliver to dovecot instead of
maildir, and use dovecot sieve to del
in bind9 i just do
rndc nta kolabsys.com
it have being a problem very long time now :/
after that i see that ssl gives untrusted, but mail to maillist is
atleast delivered
should i resolve the untrusted part seen from
posttls_finger lists.roundcube.net
?
Hi Benny
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 09:35:29PM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> in bind9 i just do
> rndc nta kolabsys.com
> it have being a problem very long time now :/
What is the problem you are seeing? Yes, kolabsys.com is not in good
shape, see https://dnsviz.net/d/kolabsys.com/dnssec/. But is
On 2021-05-04 21:58, Bastian Blank wrote:
| % drill -TD kolabsys.com -k
/tmp/source/dns-root-data-2021011101/root.key
| ;; Number of trusted keys: 1
| ;; Domain: .
| [T] . 172800 IN DNSKEY 256 3 8 ;{id = 14631 (zsk), size = 2048b}
| [T] com. 86400 IN DNSKEY 256 3 8 ;{id = 54714 (zsk), size = 12
* Bill Cole [210504 15:12]:
> On 2021-05-04 at 14:55:29 UTC-0400 (Tue, 04 May 2021 14:55:29 -0400)
>
> is rumored to have said:
>
> > Using Linux, postfix, dovecot.
> >
> > For sorting incoming mail into different maildir folders, i know general
> > advice is to have postfix deliver to dovecot
Dnia 4.05.2021 o godz. 14:55:29 post...@ptld.com pisze:
> Using Linux, postfix, dovecot.
>
> For sorting incoming mail into different maildir folders, i know
> general advice is to have postfix deliver to dovecot instead of
> maildir, and use dovecot sieve to deliver the mail into a user's
> sub-
Hello,
Does there any difference between setting "relayhost" and default_transport
smtp with
explicit next hop?
Ilya.
Hello,
It is suggested to provide list of relay_domains explicitly for the backup
mx:
http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html#backup
But another solution is to set "permit_mx_backup" for
"smtp_relay_restrictions".
It seems to be a flexible approach (since only DNS should be chan
On 2021-05-04 at 20:38:55 UTC-0400 (Wed, 5 May 2021 03:38:55 +0300)
IL Ka
is rumored to have said:
Hello,
It is suggested to provide list of relay_domains explicitly for the
backup
mx:
http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html#backup
But another solution is to set "permit_mx
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 02:20:30AM +0300, IL Ka wrote:
> Does there any difference between setting "relayhost" and
> default_transport smtp with explicit next hop?
Yes, "relayhost" also affects the routing of mail to "relay_domains".
--
Viktor.
19 matches
Mail list logo
