Hello,
Munin server and munin nodes with standards and home-made plugins (for
bounces).
http://munin-monitoring.org/
Bye
Le 24/01/2020 à 07:09, Ed a écrit :
Hello,
What do people use for simple throughput/relay/bounce graphing?
RRD based would be nice.
--
C. Gallo
Equipe reseau
CISR
Univ
Hello
mailgraph [1] is RRD based and does bounces by default. It does a very
good job on my own servers and the servers I administer at work.
If you want to have all-possible-kind-one-can-think-of graphs, then I
can only recommend to bring your maillogs via shipper (like logstash or
filebeat) int
Hi,
Like Cédric I would recommend Munin if your need is very basic. It's RRD inside
and pretty straightforward to setup.
I do use a Munin master/Munin Node setup for basic stuff including graphing
postfix queues/thoughput, but it's just static and I think email flow
monitoring requires somethi
Le 24/01/2020 à 07:09, Ed a écrit :
What do people use for simple throughput/relay/bounce graphing?
RRD based would be nice.
January 24, 2020 9:47 AM, "Cédric Gallo" wrote:
Munin server and munin nodes with standards and home-made plugins (for bounces).
http://munin-monitoring.org
On 24.0
By default, local_recipient_maps looks something like this, and to be
(locally) delivered something must have an envelope recipient in here.
In fact, SMTP milters are not called until after this check is made:
local_recipient_maps = proxy:unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps
I want to call a milter
Fred Morris:
> By default, local_recipient_maps looks something like this, and to be
> (locally) delivered something must have an envelope recipient in here.
> In fact, SMTP milters are not called until after this check is made:
>
> local_recipient_maps = proxy:unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps
>
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 10:04:26AM -0800, Fred Morris wrote:
> I want to call a milter as a "bump in the wire" before this check to
> potentially alter local recipients prior to them ricocheting off of all
> of that shininess.
>
> net -> Postfix -> Postfix
> ^ ^
> |
On 23 Jan 2020, at 16:49, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 04:39:40PM -0700, @lbutlr wrote:
>
>> What is the expected behavior for an email with a double delimiter?
>>
>> user+foo+...@example.com
>
> The base portion of the address is "user", the extension is "foo+bar".
>
>> It
