But how can I do this?
In master.cf I add a service eg called "mycleanup" with
mycleanup unix ... cleanup -o header_checks=file
Essentially a renamed copy of the cleanup service with -o header_checks
Then I add the parameter -o cleanup_service_name=mycleanup to existing pickup
I don't need to
Hi Friends,
on a VPS Debian Stretch, Postfix 3.1.9-0, Dovecot 2.2.27-3, rspamd
1.8.3-1, Clamav 0.100.2, postfix-mysql 3.1.9-0, dovecot-mysql 2.2.27-3
running "systemctl -l status postfix" obtain:
● postfix.service - Postfix Mail Transport Agent
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/postfix.s
> On Mar 22, 2019, at 3:00 AM, lutz.niede...@gmx.net wrote:
>
> But how can I do this?
As noted below.
> In master.cf I add a service eg called "mycleanup" with
> mycleanup unix ... cleanup -o header_checks=file
Well, not "=file" but "=pcre:file" or similar.
> Essentially a renamed copy of the
On Fri, 22 Mar 2019, Davide Marchi wrote:
Hi Friends,
on a VPS Debian Stretch, Postfix 3.1.9-0, Dovecot 2.2.27-3, rspamd 1.8.3-1,
Clamav 0.100.2, postfix-mysql 3.1.9-0, dovecot-mysql 2.2.27-3
running "systemctl -l status postfix" obtain:
● postfix.service - Postfix Mail Transport Agent
Lo
Davide Marchi:
> Hi Friends,
> on a VPS Debian Stretch, Postfix 3.1.9-0, Dovecot 2.2.27-3, rspamd
> 1.8.3-1, Clamav 0.100.2, postfix-mysql 3.1.9-0, dovecot-mysql 2.2.27-3
>
> running "systemctl -l status postfix" obtain:
>
Perhaps surprisingly, Postfix logs why it terminates.
http://www.postfi
On March 22, 2019 3:11:24 PM UTC, Davide Marchi wrote:
>Hi Friends,
>on a VPS Debian Stretch, Postfix 3.1.9-0, Dovecot 2.2.27-3, rspamd
>1.8.3-1, Clamav 0.100.2, postfix-mysql 3.1.9-0, dovecot-mysql 2.2.27-3
>
>running "systemctl -l status postfix" obtain:
>
>
>● postfix.service - Postfix Mail
Scott Kitterman ha scritto:
First, this is a Debian specific question based on how we did systemd
integration. It's not a general issue. For Debian specific questions,
distro support resources are a better place to seek help. [..]
Yes, I had done it, then (two days later) I posted in ML
B.
It seems to work.
Thank you!
Gesendet: Freitag, 22. März 2019 um 16:15 Uhr
Von: "Viktor Dukhovni"
An: "Postfix users"
Betreff: Re: Add Header only if sent via sendmail
> On Mar 22, 2019, at 3:00 AM, lutz.niede...@gmx.net wrote:
>
> But how can I do this?
As noted below.
> In master.cf I
Hi everyone:
I have a small mail server with fewer emails account, The server is:
Opensuse/Postfix/apache
Today i receive a pishing email Words more or less say that i was hacked, that
he know my passwords blah blah blah and i must pay on bit_coins. The email
content is 100% pishing and
On 3/22/2019 7:19 PM, Christian Schmitz wrote:
> Hi everyone:
> I have a small mail server with fewer emails account, The server is:
> Opensuse/Postfix/apache
>
> Today i receive a pishing email Words more or less say that i was hacked,
> that
> he know my passwords blah blah blah and i mu
> On Mar 22, 2019, at 7:34 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> They do know the passwords but they didn't hack your PC. See
> haveibeenpwned.com. They compromised other services you use and you need
> better password management.
No. The scareware alerts are generally completely fake. They
a
On 3/22/2019 7:55 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> No. The scareware alerts are generally completely fake. They
> are spammed indiscriminately to users the scammer knows nothing
> about.
Viktor, that does not agree with my significant experience studying this
particular spam threat. Yes, they are "
On 3/22/2019 7:54 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 3/22/2019 7:55 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
No. The scareware alerts are generally completely fake. They
are spammed indiscriminately to users the scammer knows nothing
about.
Viktor, that does not agree with my significant experience studying
On 3/22/19 9:11 PM, Julian Opificius wrote:
>
> On 3/22/2019 7:54 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>> On 3/22/2019 7:55 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>>> No. The scareware alerts are generally completely fake. They
>>> are spammed indiscriminately to users the scammer knows nothing
>>> about.
>>
>> Vikt
On 3/22/2019 9:06 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> Sure they may also be scraping email addresses from breaches, but
> that's one source. These scams are not a specific indication that
> one's passwords are at risk. That's true or false with or without
> receipt of these scams.
Have you checked on h
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 09:23:13PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> > Sure they may also be scraping email addresses from breaches, but
> > that's one source. These scams are not a specific indication that
> > one's passwords are at risk. That's true or false with or without
> > receipt of these
On 22 Mar 2019, at 19:19, Christian Schmitz wrote:
Hi everyone:
I have a small mail server with fewer emails account, The server is:
Opensuse/Postfix/apache
Today i receive a pishing email Words more or less say that i was
hacked, that
he know my passwords blah blah blah and i must pay
On 22/03/2019 23:19, Christian Schmitz wrote:
Hi everyone:
I have a small mail server with fewer emails account, The server is:
Opensuse/Postfix/apache
Today i receive a pishing email Words more or less say that i was hacked, that
he know my passwords blah blah blah and i must pay on bit
On 3/22/2019 9:31 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> Have you checked on haveibeenpwned for the email addresses and domains
>> in question?
> There's no need. The team mailboxes in question are not associated
> with any login accounts, they're just public contact addresses
> scraped from websites.
You
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 9:46 PM Bill Cole
wrote:
>
> On 22 Mar 2019, at 19:19, Christian Schmitz wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone:
> > I have a small mail server with fewer emails account, The server is:
> > Opensuse/Postfix/apache
> >
> > Today i receive a pishing email Words more or less say that
On 22 Mar 2019, at 21:56, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
I would add that spamassassin does not seem to have much of a
problem catching that
True. This is due to a lot of work by John Hardin to create and maintain
a focused rule cluster that catches a big slice of this garbage. It has
morphed subs
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2019-03-23 00:34:
Also see KAM.cf and the KAM_CRIM ruleset for spamassassin for this
exact run of spams.
will you add good rules to core spamassassin ?
so above is testing rules, not yet ready for core, if its stable just
not in core i can see why thay could not be
On 3/22/2019 10:45 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2019-03-23 00:34:
>
>> Also see KAM.cf and the KAM_CRIM ruleset for spamassassin for this
>> exact run of spams.
>
> will you add good rules to core spamassassin ?
>
> so above is testing rules, not yet ready for core, if its
On 22 Mar 2019, at 20:54, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 3/22/2019 7:55 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
No. The scareware alerts are generally completely fake. They
are spammed indiscriminately to users the scammer knows nothing
about.
Viktor, that does not agree with my significant experience study
On 22 Mar 2019, at 19:45, Bill Cole
wrote:
> Do not accept mail claiming to be from any address in a local domain on the
> port 25 (smtp) smtpd service. Only accept such mail via port 587 (submission)
> and 465 (smtps) services configured to require authentication.
And the way to do this is:
25 matches
Mail list logo
