You were right.
There were overrides in the master.cf and I forgot to check that.
And to make matters funny, the same filename was used for sender_login_maps
and virtual_alias_maps.
Fixed the file names and now it works.
Thank you for your help
--
Sent from: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/
hi,
smtp_header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_chk
/^Subject: .*test.*/ FILTER test:
Postfix then logs:
Jan 30 12:44:16 mx2 postfix/cleanup[19243]: 096B95EAE2: filter: header
Subject: some text test from mail-cloud-01.asdfasdf.tld[1.2.3.4];(...)
How to disable logging of this events? I simp
Stefan Bauer:
> hi,
>
> smtp_header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_chk
>
> /^Subject: .*test.*/ FILTER test:
>
> Postfix then logs:
>
> Jan 30 12:44:16 mx2 postfix/cleanup[19243]: 096B95EAE2: filter: header
> Subject: some text test from mail-cloud-01.asdfasdf.tld[1.2.3.4];(...)
>
> How to
Wietse Venema:
> Stefan Bauer:
> > hi,
> >
> > smtp_header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_chk
> >
> > /^Subject: .*test.*/ FILTER test:
> >
> > Postfix then logs:
> >
> > Jan 30 12:44:16 mx2 postfix/cleanup[19243]: 096B95EAE2: filter: header
> > Subject: some text test from mail-cloud-01.asd
Even though this is not a postfix specific issue I was hoping someone in the
community could help with this issue.
We recently changed IP addresses as we purchased a /24 to use as we plan to
move Internet service provides in the near future.
Once we did this we now get the following from yahoo.
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 09:55:49 -0800
"Robert Mann" wrote:
> Does anyone have any ideas or suggestions or even know of a service that can
> help with these types of issues?
You may try to check your IP address reputation. For that I usually use
https://mxtoolbox.com/ which is just one of the many ar
mxtoolbox is a great tool to see almost all blacklists on your ips, as
Luciano mentioned, but yahoo doesn't report their own blacklists so
that tool can only tell you if the ips have been blacklisted in other
places. TSS09 is the same as yahoo's old TS03 which is a permanent
block as the message te
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 2:51 PM Paul C wrote:
>
> mxtoolbox is a great tool to see almost all blacklists on your ips, as
> Luciano mentioned, but yahoo doesn't report their own blacklists so
> that tool can only tell you if the ips have been blacklisted in other
> places. TSS09 is the same as yaho
Greetings, Wietse Venema!
> I'm reconsidering the once-per-year schedule for stable releases.
> Basically, a Postfix stable release freezes development at a point
> in time, forever. Primarily, this is good for stability.
> * In this day and age it seems archaic to have to wait for up to a
> ye
Not disputing the below information, but was curious as we have been
researching DMARC is it possible (perhaps a different destination not yahoo),
that it has something to do with the DMARC report showing one thing and now it
shows something else. I am just getting spun up on DMARC and learning
On 1/30/19 3:17 PM, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> I find amusing [Yahoo] are taking this heavy handled approach with
> a "we are not let the likes of you make out garden insecure, scum!"
> and yet how many times they got hacked?
Ah, but that's DIFFERENT...
--
Phil Stracchino
Babylon Commu
Mainly, I don't want to race to get code ready for the once-per-year
release, and I don't want to wait for an entire year if the code
is not ready before the deadline.
Release any time a sufficiently important feature is ready and do not
let any schedule pressure force you to compromise on qual
I do not care much what other projects do. Postfix has a good record
for quality, stability and compatibility, and it supports four
stable releases, each release receiving updates for four years.
I do observe that 1) several major features were ready about 6
months after the 3.3 stable release tha
One problem with LTS releases is that down-stream distros can end
up running very old code (for example with 4-year LTS up-stream,
a down-stream distro with 4-year LTS can end up running 8-year old
code, which is really a pain to support on a mailing list like this
one). SMTP may be an old protocol
* Wietse Venema :
> I do not care much what other projects do. Postfix has a good record
> for quality, stability and compatibility, and it supports four
> stable releases, each release receiving updates for four years.
>
> I do observe that 1) several major features were ready about 6
> months af
> On Jan 30, 2019, at 4:39 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>
> Why wait for a group of features before a release? Why not release per
> feature?
Because people want a reasonable period of support for released code.
And we can only support a small handful of releases. So increasing the
release ca
Hi there,
I had this exact issue when I first started warming up the IP I was
sending my company email from. Any email going to a Yahoo server you
need to throttle heavily as if you try and send to much too quickly you
will get your IP blocked. When yahoo blocks you - because of this it
tak
On 30 Jan 2019, at 16:26, Philip wrote:
> had this exact issue when I first started warming up the IP I was sending my
> company email from. Any email going to a Yahoo server you need to throttle
> heavily as if you try and send to much too quickly you will get your IP
> blocked.
I "solved"
Recently I rolled out a transition from sendmail to postfix. I've been very
happy with the changes except for one feature, which was supported by
sendmail but I'm not sure what to do about it in postfix.
This is the use of a backslash before a username in the aliases file. A
backslash inhibits fur
Jeremiah Rothschild:
> Recently I rolled out a transition from sendmail to postfix. I've been very
> happy with the changes except for one feature, which was supported by
> sendmail but I'm not sure what to do about it in postfix.
>
> This is the use of a backslash before a username in the aliases
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 05:18:19PM -0800, Jeremiah Rothschild wrote:
> Recently I rolled out a transition from sendmail to postfix. I've been very
> happy with the changes except for one feature, which was supported by
> sendmail but I'm not sure what to do about it in postfix.
>
> This is the us
On 1/30/19 4:45 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> On Jan 30, 2019, at 4:39 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>>
>> Why wait for a group of features before a release? Why not release per
>> feature?
> Because people want a reasonable period of support for released code.
> And we can only support a small h
22 matches
Mail list logo
