In your case you are using selector with the name default. If you use
opendkim-genkey -s mx0 then it will generate key for mx0 selector (you must
update dns records accordingly instead of default._domainkey.school.kiwi
mx0._domainkey.school.kiwi and for mx1 generate with selector mx1 and dns
re
Just quick fix I wrote wrong instructions s=* means for all services.
You have to edit
/etc/opendkim.conf
Subdomains Yes
And
/etc/opendkim/SigningTable
example.com default._domainkey.example.com
.example.com default._domainkey.example.com
Anvar Kuchkartaev
an...@anvartay.com
Original Mess
Kent skrev den 2017-12-13 08:40:
Is this possible ?
no
http://www.opendkim.org/opendkim-atpszone.8.html
unless its atps signed
imho your server hostnaame must be dkim signed
then you can reuse keys to subdomain signing
its complex setup, so join opendkim maillist asking specific to this
Recently stumpled upon BIMI;
https://authindicators.github.io/rfc-brand-indicators-for-message-identification/#rfc.section.3
What is your view on it? I think that BIMI is more a cosmetic thing
rather than something that prevent spoofing.
Is there any plans to implement support for it in postf
Sven Schwedas skrev den 2017-12-12 16:12:
On 2017-12-12 10:55, J Doe wrote:
I was wondering if fellow Postfix users would still recommend using
amavisd-new
when integrating AV (ClamAV), and spam filtering (SpamAssasin) ?
There's nothing wrong with Amavis. The only decent alternative I know
John Stoffel skrev den 2017-12-12 16:53:
Now to figure out why spamassisin as a milter ain't working
properly...
try rmilter, configure it for spamd, so you dont need to use spamc :=)
same auhor as rspamd maked it, rmilter is now depricated, hopefully he
wont delete it
ucl was born to user
I use MailScanner, I'm happy so far with it.
On 2017-12-13 10:05, Benny Pedersen wrote:
John Stoffel skrev den 2017-12-12 16:53:
Now to figure out why spamassisin as a milter ain't working
properly...
try rmilter, configure it for spamd, so you dont need to use spamc :=)
same auhor as rspa
Maarten skrev den 2017-12-13 10:11:
I use MailScanner, I'm happy so far with it.
bad solotion with postfix, since mailscanner uses queue dirs directly,
this is not supported in postfix, mailscanner is designed for sendmail
only, dont try other mta with it
According to their documentation using MailScanner with postfix works
too.
https://www.mailscanner.info/postfix/
What would be the advantage to switching to something like amavisd-new?
.
On 2017-12-13 10:28, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Maarten skrev den 2017-12-13 10:11:
I use MailScanner, I'm ha
On 2017-12-13 Maarten wrote:
> According to their documentation using MailScanner with postfix works
> too.
>
> https://www.mailscanner.info/postfix/
MailScanner operates on Postfix internal structures (namely the mail
queue). Postfix does not make guarantees about these (meaning they might
be s
I'll have a look at amavisd-new after the new year since that seems to
be the more update one.
So with amvisd-new you can also do spam filtering, use different
scanners, filename blocking etc?
On 2017-12-13 11:02, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2017-12-13 Maarten wrote:
According to their docume
I'm running a Postfix server that receives mail for a number of domains,
and provides service for mail users via Dovecot. It's not used for
sending mail from users, another server acts as the mail relay.
Is it possible to configure my Postfix server so that locally generated
mail (e.g. from cr
Jonathan,
BIMI adds an URI as header to a message. It is supposed to point to a
location, where mail clients can download an image, which is supposed to
show a brand indicator, vulgo "logo".
Which kind of support would you expect from an MTA such as Postfix?
p@rick
Am 13.12.2017 um 09:38 schri
On 13.12.17 11:13, Maarten wrote:
I'll have a look at amavisd-new after the new year since that seems
to be the more update one.
So with amvisd-new you can also do spam filtering, use different
scanners, filename blocking etc?
yes.
On 2017-12-13 11:02, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
MailScanner ope
Jonathan S?lea:
> Recently stumpled upon BIMI;
>
> https://authindicators.github.io/rfc-brand-indicators-for-message-identification/#rfc.section.3
>
> What is your view on it? I think that BIMI is more a cosmetic thing
> rather than something that prevent spoofing.
>
> Is there any plans to imp
> On Dec 13, 2017, at 3:38 AM, Jonathan Sélea wrote:
>
> Recently stumpled upon BIMI;
>
> https://authindicators.github.io/rfc-brand-indicators-for-message-identification/#rfc.section.3
>
> What is your view on it? I think that BIMI is more a cosmetic thing rather
> than something that preve
On 13 Dec 2017, at 4:45 (-0500), Maarten wrote:
According to their documentation using MailScanner with postfix works
too.
https://www.mailscanner.info/postfix/
Yes, and there's a link at the bottom of that page to the postfix.org
add-on page which specifically warns against MailScanner.
Hai,
mailscanner runs fine here for about 5-6 years now, with postfix.
Mailscanner + postfix (postscreen) rules here :-)
But if you want a quicky to test.
https://efa-project.org/ = Mailscanner + mailwatch +... Lots of extra's.
Greetz,
Louis
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van:
On 12/13/2017 10:52 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
Hai,
mailscanner runs fine here for about 5-6 years now, with postfix.
Mailscanner + postfix (postscreen) rules here :-)
You *think* it's been running fine. When the author of postfix
specifically warns against using it, it would be foolhardy t
No, i know it runs fine, after about 2-3 milion emails processed, i know ..
Really..
And no i did not ignore him, but i want mailscanner and i want postfix and not
exim.
Did you even try it and test it? And if so, what did you encounter??
I only found 1 thing and thats fixed.
something with
Thanks for the reply, unfortunately the approach doesn’t seem to work for me.
It appears that that the regardless of the smtp_recipient_restrictions setting,
that any addresses listed in /etc/aliases addressed to $mydomain is bypassing
any blocking/filtering. Is this expected behavior?
>
>
On 13 Dec 2017, at 11:01 (-0500), L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
No, i know it runs fine, after about 2-3 milion emails processed, i
know .. Really..
My vague recollection of MailScanner's inherent risk is that it is
volume-dependent, i.e. it might never cause any problem with a million
messages ov
Where can I find documentation on all the settings of the amavis-new
configuration file. The only documentation I can find is about how to
set it up with postfix in README.postfix. There are some comments in
the configuration file, but not clear enough for me to understand what
each setting do
On 14 December 2017 at 00:13, Maarten wrote:
> Where can I find documentation on all the settings of the amavis-new
> configuration file. The only documentation I can find is about how to
> set it up with postfix in README.postfix. There are some comments in
> the configuration file, but not cl
24 matches
Mail list logo
