Hai,
mailscanner runs fine here for about 5-6 years now, with postfix. Mailscanner + postfix (postscreen) rules here :-) But if you want a quicky to test. https://efa-project.org/ = Mailscanner + mailwatch +... Lots of extra's. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: postfixlists-070...@billmail.scconsult.com > [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] Namens Bill Cole > Verzonden: woensdag 13 december 2017 16:46 > Aan: Postfix users > Onderwerp: Re: Question regarding use of amavisd-new > > On 13 Dec 2017, at 4:45 (-0500), Maarten wrote: > > > According to their documentation using MailScanner with > postfix works > > too. > > > > https://www.mailscanner.info/postfix/ > > Yes, and there's a link at the bottom of that page to the postfix.org > add-on page which specifically warns against MailScanner. > > > What would be the advantage to switching to something like > > amavisd-new? > > The advantage to something that uses the SMTP Proxy interface or the > Milter interface is that you can trust that it won't be > broken without > warning or documentation in a future Postfix release. Apart from the > risk that it relies on Postfix not changing queue structures and > behaviors which are explicitly unsupported and subject to change, > MailScanner works directly with the Postfix queue in a way > that Wietse > has been saying for years is already not safe. I haven't analyzed the > Postfix queue-handling code (life is too short...) but I trust his > judgment of safety in working with the Postfix queue over > that of anyone > who didn't write that code. The MailScanner argument > (essentially that > what they do doesn't break enough to notice) is entirely unpersuasive. > > -- > Bill Cole > b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org > (AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses) > Currently Seeking Steady Work: https://linkedin.com/in/billcole > >
