Hi,
> Am 30.03.2017 um 17:25 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni :
>
>
>> On Mar 30, 2017, at 11:15 AM, Christian Rößner
>> wrote:
>>
>> It is a VM, but the host uses ECC-RAM. No errors were reported to the kernel
>> message buffer.
>
> Is it possible that some log messages were lost when the log
> so
Hi,
will it be possible to remove string [MASSMAIL] from outgoing E-mails ?
From: bla!@firma.com
to: *@gmail.com
Subject: [MASSMAIL] text of the messages
I would like to have some thing like this.
From: bla!@firma.com
to: *@gmail.com
Subject: text of the messages
Unfortunatelly Mailman addin
This is a Mailman mailing list you run? That Mailman has the option to add a
tag in front of the subject (and it’s not the default so you would have had to
explicitly turn it on). There is a Mailman-users mailing list and that would be
the appropriate place for help.
But, since it says [MASSMAI
Neither do I as you have provided no information about your Postfix
configuration or anything else. As it says in the Postfix list welcome email
you received:
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
But if you’ve verified Mailman is not adding it as a list prefix tag
This list (postfix-users) is so configured that when I`m clicking Reply on
Your answer, system sending message to directly to you instead of the list.
On mobile device some times its difficult. It was not my intention to write
an E-mail directly to You... I prefer list.
Mailman is connected as usu
As I see here header_checks can do it. There is only one problem. This rule
searching for a subject with string [MASSMAIL] and replacing complete
subject line with word "test".
/^Subject:.*[MASSMAIL].*/ REPLACE Subject: test
How to replace only single string [MAILMAN] without interrupting the re
* Zalezny Niezalezny :
> As I see here header_checks can do it. There is only one problem. This rule
> searching for a subject with string [MASSMAIL] and replacing complete
> subject line with word "test".
>
> /^Subject:.*[MASSMAIL].*/ REPLACE Subject: test
/^Subject:(.*)[MASSMAIL](.*)/ REPLACE S
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * Zalezny Niezalezny :
> > As I see here header_checks can do it. There is only one problem. This rule
> > searching for a subject with string [MASSMAIL] and replacing complete
> > subject line with word "test".
> >
> > /^Subject:.*[MASSMAIL].*/ REPLACE Subject: test
>
> /^
Hi everyone,
i'm having a curious issue with our postfix instance.
It seems it is sending emails to a domain's A record when no MX is found.
Is that standard? If so, can i disable this somewhere?
connect to bikinibottom.com[208.73.211.70]:25: Connection refused
to=, relay=none, delay=407,
del
* Mario Theodoridis :
> Hi everyone,
>
> i'm having a curious issue with our postfix instance.
>
> It seems it is sending emails to a domain's A record when no MX is found.
>
> Is that standard?
Yes.
> If so, can i disable this somewhere?
No.
> connect to bikinibottom.com[208.73.211.70]:25:
I`m comming to You with this big bottle of virtual beer :))
http://craftbeernation.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/very-big-beer.jpg
Thanks a lot my friend
und viele Gruesse aus Nuernberg!
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > *
Hello,
Does anyone in postfix mailing list have experience using Postifx software for
sending bulk emails with TLS encryption? Can you share your experience with me?
The amount of bulk email is quite large, normally for marketing purpose. In the
past we have been using sendmail bundled with Cen
> "John" == John Stoffel writes:
> "Noel" == Noel Jones writes:
Noel> On 3/30/2017 9:26 AM, John Stoffel wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> We're running postfix-2.6.6-6.el6_5.x86_64 on RHEL 6.6 and running
>>> into a problem where emails that have been released from our outside
>>> spam p
> On Mar 31, 2017, at 4:03 PM, Xinhuan Zheng wrote:
>
> Does anyone in postfix mailing list have experience using Postifx software
> for sending bulk emails with TLS encryption? Can you share your experience
> with me?
TLS does not materially affect the performance of bulk-email delivery except
On 3/31/2017 3:50 PM, John Stoffel wrote:
> So I created the following entry in my header_checks file:
>
> /^Delivered-To:/ WARN Found email with Delivered-To: header already in it!
>
> And while it did correctly warn on a bogus email that matched with
> looping, it also matched on a bunch of o
On 01/04/17 09:03, Xinhuan Zheng wrote:
> Does anyone in postfix mailing list have experience using Postifx
> software for sending bulk emails with TLS encryption? Can you share your
> experience with me?
It works just fine.
> The amount of bulk email is quite large, normally
> for marketing purp
On 30 March 2017 at 17:42, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
>
> > On Mar 30, 2017, at 12:35 PM, Dominic Raferd
> wrote:
> >
> > As I understand it, DKIM requires a separate DNS record for each
> subdomain
>
> No, DKIM has no such requirement. The DKIM signing domain "d=" in the
> DKIM signature header i
17 matches
Mail list logo
