can't connect/send to postfix

2016-09-30 Thread patg
Hello, i try to use postfix with some others tools (amavis, spamassassin, dovecot...), but i can't send mail message to server(1.80) from an other computer (1.50). i use the smtp (25) port (but i want use 25 or 587 ports), for the tests i want to use only 25. i used this tutorial : https://m

Re: can't connect/send to postfix

2016-09-30 Thread wilfried.es...@essignetz.de
Hi, looks like your mysql table for mysql-virtual-alias-maps.cf is not, what postfix expects: Am 30.09.2016 um 09:27 schrieb patg: > Sep 30 09:00:06 mail postfix/cleanup[8397]: warning: mysql query failed: > Unknown column 'address' in 'where clause' > Sep 30 09:00:06 mail postfix/cleanup[8397

Blocking "unknown"

2016-09-30 Thread Postfix User
Postfix-3.2-20160917 with FreeBSD-11.0 /64 bit Lately, I have been finding the following entries in the maillog: 13643:Sep 30 02:00:40 scorpio postfix/smtpd[83056]: warning: hostname ip-address-pool-xxx.fpt.vn does not resolve to address 118.71.251.67: hostname nor servname provided, or not kno

Re: Blocking "unknown"

2016-09-30 Thread Ralph Seichter
On 30.09.2016 12:26, Postfix User wrote: > 13822:Sep 30 02:00:40 scorpio postfix/smtpd[83056]: > connect from unknown[118.71.251.67] You can use reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname, but I recommend you don't. Many legitimate mail sources have not configured reverse DNS entries. -Ralph

Re: Blocking "unknown"

2016-09-30 Thread Allen Coates
On 30/09/16 11:26, Postfix User wrote: > Lately, I have been finding the following entries in the maillog: > > 13643:Sep 30 02:00:40 scorpio postfix/smtpd[83056]: warning: hostname > ip-address-pool-xxx.fpt.vn does not resolve to address 118.71.251.67: > hostname nor servname provided, or not k

Re: WoSign/StartCom CA in the news

2016-09-30 Thread John
This may be way off topic, if I apologise. Looking a the available CAs many of them do not seem to pass the /s//niff test//./ WoSign/Startcom are not alone in being found to be either incompetent or dishonest. Which made me wonder if there might be an alternative to CA issued certs. Is there a

Re: WoSign/StartCom CA in the news

2016-09-30 Thread /dev/rob0
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 08:36:58AM -0400, John wrote: > This may be way off topic, if I apologise. Not really, not much anyway. > Looking a the available CAs many of them do not seem to pass the > /s//niff test//./ WoSign/Startcom are not alone in being found to > be either incompetent or disho

Re: WoSign/StartCom CA in the news

2016-09-30 Thread Wietse Venema
John: > This may be way off topic, if I apologise. > > Looking a the available CAs many of them do not seem to pass the > /s//niff test//./ WoSign/Startcom are not alone in being found to be > either incompetent or dishonest. Which made me wonder if there might be > an alternative to CA issued

Re: Blocking "unknown"

2016-09-30 Thread /dev/rob0
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 01:02:34PM +0200, Ralph Seichter wrote: > On 30.09.2016 12:26, Postfix User wrote: > > > 13822:Sep 30 02:00:40 scorpio postfix/smtpd[83056]: > > connect from unknown[118.71.251.67] > > You can use reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname, but I recommend > you don't. Many l

Re: Blocking "unknown"

2016-09-30 Thread /dev/rob0
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 06:26:35AM -0400, Postfix User wrote: > Postfix-3.2-20160917 with FreeBSD-11.0 /64 bit > > Lately, I have been finding the following entries in the maillog: > > 13643:Sep 30 02:00:40 scorpio postfix/smtpd[83056]: warning: > hostname ip-address-pool-xxx.fpt.vn does not res

Re: WoSign/StartCom CA in the news

2016-09-30 Thread John @ KLaM
Yes, I understand DANE can be used for MTAs. My musing is could it completely replace the existing CA mess, and I suppose the follow up is how? On September 30, 2016 09:12:30 wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote: John: This may be way off topic, if I apologise. Looking a the availabl

Re: Blocking "unknown"

2016-09-30 Thread Alex
Hi, On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:14 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 01:02:34PM +0200, Ralph Seichter wrote: >> On 30.09.2016 12:26, Postfix User wrote: >> >> > 13822:Sep 30 02:00:40 scorpio postfix/smtpd[83056]: >> > connect from unknown[118.71.251.67] >> >> You can use reject_unknown

Re: Blocking "unknown"

2016-09-30 Thread Ralph Seichter
On 30.09.16 15:14, /dev/rob0 wrote: > I think it's reasonable now to expect a legitimate SMTP client to > have a PTR record, and perhaps in the not-too-distant future to > expect PTR/A matching. Based on personal experience, I stand by my recommendation to not reject e-mail based on the absence o

Re: Blocking "unknown"

2016-09-30 Thread li...@lazygranch.com
On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 06:26:35 -0400 Postfix User wrote: > Postfix-3.2-20160917 with FreeBSD-11.0 /64 bit > > Lately, I have been finding the following entries in the maillog: > > 13643:Sep 30 02:00:40 scorpio postfix/smtpd[83056]: warning: hostname > ip-address-pool-xxx.fpt.vn does not resolve t