If I configure canonical_classes to include header_sender and
header_recipient, which headers are included exactly? Can this be
configured?
TIA,
Rob Maidment
Rob Maidment:
> If I configure canonical_classes to include header_sender and
> header_recipient, which headers are included exactly? Can this be
> configured?
Header properties (including header formats) are not (yet) configurable.
The properties are defined in a table in global/header_opts.c, w
Thanks Wietse. So the list is (in 3.1.1):
HDR_OPT_SENDER:
Disposition-Notification-To
Errors-To
From
Mail-Followup-To
Reply-To
Resent-From
Resent-Sender
Return-Path
Return-Receipt-To
Sender
HEADER_OPT_XRECIP:
Bcc
Cc
Resent-Bcc
Resent-Cc
Resent-To
To
On 2 June 2016 at 14:08, Wietse Venema wrot
I need some help working out why my postfix 2.10.1 is removing the
sender address when I send mail from a $mynetworks host using a
non-$mydestination sender address. I have a very standard installation
and I am not knowingly rewriting the sender address. I have the following:
mydestination = $
Clarification: I seem to recall someone asking whether they should leave
RBLs in the smtpd_*_restrictions now that they've added them to postscreen.
And I seem to recall that the answer was something like "why not, it doesn't
hurt". But it seems to me that if would hurt because: a) it adds a
redu
> On Jun 2, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Alex wrote:
>
> I need some help working out why my postfix 2.10.1 is removing the sender
> address when I send mail from a $mynetworks host using a non-$mydestination
> sender address.
Postfix does not do that.
> postfix/trivial-rewrite[30908]: match_list_matc
Michael Fox:
> Clarification: I seem to recall someone asking whether they should leave
> RBLs in the smtpd_*_restrictions now that they've added them to postscreen.
> And I seem to recall that the answer was something like "why not, it doesn't
> hurt". But it seems to me that if would hurt becau
I have a content filter that needs to ensure certain messages are
relayed to a specific nexthop MTA, based on the message content. How
can the content filter influence how the message is routed?
I guess I could run an instance of smtp for each custom nexthop and
configure each instance to relay a
You're right! Thanks.
On 02/06/2016 16:39, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Jun 2, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Alex wrote:
I need some help working out why my postfix 2.10.1 is removing the sender
address when I send mail from a $mynetworks host using a non-$mydestination
sender address.
Postfix does not d
> On Jun 2, 2016, at 12:04 PM, Rob Maidment wrote:
>
> I have a content filter that needs to ensure certain messages are
> relayed to a specific nexthop MTA, based on the message content. How
> can the content filter influence how the message is routed?
That's what content filters do. They pr
> Michael Fox:
> > Clarification: I seem to recall someone asking whether they should
> leave
> > RBLs in the smtpd_*_restrictions now that they've added them to
> postscreen.
> > And I seem to recall that the answer was something like "why not, it
> doesn't
> > hurt". But it seems to me that i
On 02/06/16 17:45, Michael Fox wrote:
> If a DNSBL in postscreen_dnsbl_sites has a weight >=
> postscreen_dnsbl_threshold, then is there any advantage to also
> listing it in smtpd_*_restrictions? For example, is there some failure
> mode that having the DNSBL listed in both places would protect
Viktor Dukhovni:
>
> > On Jun 2, 2016, at 12:04 PM, Rob Maidment wrote:
> >
> > I have a content filter that needs to ensure certain messages are
> > relayed to a specific nexthop MTA, based on the message content. How
> > can the content filter influence how the message is routed?
>
> That's
> On 02/06/16 17:45, Michael Fox wrote:
> > If a DNSBL in postscreen_dnsbl_sites has a weight >=
> > postscreen_dnsbl_threshold, then is there any advantage to also
> > listing it in smtpd_*_restrictions? For example, is there some failure
> > mode that having the DNSBL listed in both places would
On 02/06/16 19:21, Michael Fox wrote:
>> On 02/06/16 17:45, Michael Fox wrote:
>>> If a DNSBL in postscreen_dnsbl_sites has a weight >=
>>> postscreen_dnsbl_threshold, then is there any advantage to also
>>> listing it in smtpd_*_restrictions? For example, is there some failure
>>> mode that havi
Michael Fox:
> > On 02/06/16 17:45, Michael Fox wrote:
> > > If a DNSBL in postscreen_dnsbl_sites has a weight >=
> > > postscreen_dnsbl_threshold, then is there any advantage to also
> > > listing it in smtpd_*_restrictions? For example, is there some failure
> > > mode that having the DNSBL liste
Yep, I'm replying to an old question.
...
OP, just following up, were you able to resolve your issues?
If so, can you post a summary please.
Jerry
On 01/15/15 12:59 PM, post...@outputservices.com wrote:
I am attempting to install postfix-2.11.3 on a Solaris 10 x86 machine.
I want to u
17 matches
Mail list logo
