Hello,
I have been running postfix at a small company for years without any
problem. For some reason, now I cannot get 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN when
telnetting to port 25. It may be due to a change in the upgraded
packages or a misconfiguration by me. Probably, I "fixed" something
which is not br
* Mufit Eribol :
> Hello,
>
> I have been running postfix at a small company for years without any
> problem. For some reason, now I cannot get 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN when
> telnetting to port 25. It may be due to a change in the upgraded
> packages or a misconfiguration by me. Probably, I "fixed" s
On 22.11.2015 22:44, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* Mufit Eribol :
Hello,
I have been running postfix at a small company for years without any
problem. For some reason, now I cannot get 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN when
telnetting to port 25. It may be due to a change in the upgraded
packages or a misc
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 09:43:46PM +0200, Mufit Eribol wrote:
> I have been running postfix at a small company for years without any
> problem. For some reason, now I cannot get 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN when
> telnetting to port 25. It may be due to a change in the upgraded packages or
> a misconfigur
On 23.11.2015 00:10, Mufit Eribol wrote:
On 22.11.2015 22:44, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* Mufit Eribol :
Hello,
I have been running postfix at a small company for years without any
problem. For some reason, now I cannot get 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN when
telnetting to port 25. It may be due to
This weekend I added preliminary support for JSON-formatted queue
listings. See below for a fragment from the postqueue manpage.
Now, a Postfix queue may contain millions of messages, and each
message may contain lots of recipients. A robust application would
not read the entire JSON queue listin
I'm currently testing out migrating to postfix 3.0.3. However, LMTP
delivery is failing due to:
Nov 22 20:40:56 zre-ldap002 postfix/lmtp[20350]: SSL_connect error to
zre-ldap002.eng.zimbra.com[10.137.242.52]:7025: -1
Nov 22 20:40:56 zre-ldap002 postfix/lmtp[20350]: warning: TLS library
proble
--On Sunday, November 22, 2015 6:49 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
wrote:
Setting lmtp_tls_security_level to none allows mail delivery to succeed.
Setting lmtp_tls_CApath fixed this (although that wasn't necessary in
2.11.4). Sorry for the noise. :)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platfo
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 06:49:51PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> I'm currently testing out migrating to postfix 3.0.3. However, LMTP
> delivery is failing due to:
Same OpenSSL library??? Seems implausible.
> Nov 22 20:40:56 zre-ldap002 postfix/lmtp[20350]: SSL_connect error to
> zre-ldap
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 06:57:47PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Sunday, November 22, 2015 6:49 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
> wrote:
>
> >Setting lmtp_tls_security_level to none allows mail delivery to succeed.
>
> Setting lmtp_tls_CApath fixed this (although that wasn't necessary i
--On Monday, November 23, 2015 3:13 AM + Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
Setting lmtp_tls_CApath fixed this (although that wasn't necessary in
2.11.4). Sorry for the noise. :)
I am at a loss to explain what lmtp_tls_CApath has to do with this,
most likely you just happened to flush sufficiently
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 07:29:56PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Monday, November 23, 2015 3:13 AM + Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>
> >>Setting lmtp_tls_CApath fixed this (although that wasn't necessary in
> >>2.11.4). Sorry for the noise. :)
> >
> >I am at a loss to explain what lmt
--On Monday, November 23, 2015 3:36 AM + Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 07:29:56PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Monday, November 23, 2015 3:13 AM + Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
>> Setting lmtp_tls_CApath fixed this (although that wasn't necessary in
>> 2.11.4).
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 07:29:56PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> And hm, you're right, it is a different OpenSSL version too (1.0.1p vs
> 1.0.1m).
If these are not vendor builds that mask the true upstream version
then the only plasibly relevant change in the relese notes from
1.0.1m to 1.0
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 03:51:24AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> If these are not vendor builds that mask the true upstream version
> then the only plasibly relevant change in the relese notes from
> 1.0.1m to 1.0.1p is:
>
> Changes between 1.0.1m and 1.0.1n [11 Jun 2015]
>
> *) Rejec
How many times do I need to say that /etc/postfix IS postfix.
> On Nov 20, 2015, at 04:24, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Viktor Dukhovni:
>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 03:26:27PM -0800, Vicki Brown wrote:
>>
>>> The only program that uses /usr/local/cutedge/postfix/etc is.. postfix.
>>
>> Well, the re
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
manpage_directory = /usr/share/man
queue_directory = /private/var/spool/postfix
readme_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix
sample_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix/examples
This installation has b
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 08:45:48PM -0800, Vicki Brown wrote:
> How many times do I need to say that /etc/postfix IS postfix.
Zero, instead you need to listen. You're here to get help from
folks who understand Postfix deeply. You can get help, but only
if you start listening, and stop objecting
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 08:51:46PM -0800, Vicki Brown wrote:
> command_directory = /usr/sbin
> config_directory = /etc/postfix
> daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
> manpage_directory = /usr/share/man
> queue_directory = /private/var/spool/postfix
> readme_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix
>
On 11/23/2015 05:51 PM, Vicki Brown wrote:
> Also, from my discussion with him, Bernard Teo does seem to know what he's
> doing.
I suggest you type "man postfix", scroll down to the bottom and look at
the list of authors, then compare that list to the two people who have
been trying to help you h
On 23.11.2015 00:16, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 09:43:46PM +0200, Mufit Eribol wrote:
I have been running postfix at a small company for years without any
problem. For some reason, now I cannot get 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN when
telnetting to port 25. It may be due to a change i
21 matches
Mail list logo
