On 10/20/2015 11:31 PM, wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Marco Stoecker:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
Hi,
I do have a combination of postfix and mailman and use postfix as a
relayhost. I get all the mails for mailman via fetchmail. The whole
system is Debian 8 with its packages for postfix (2.11.
Marco Stoecker:
> > All the evidence that you need is logged by Postfix and mailman:
> > track down a duplicate delivery back to the source and look for
> > delivery errors.
>
> Will do a double-check of all the logfiles again. Maybe I have overseen
> something. As I'm not the 'expert' in those t
Alex:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to obscure the names of the DNSBLs that we use in response to
> emails that are rejected. I've set up postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map and
> it's working properly for most:
>
> Oct 20 21:41:36 mail02 postfix/postscreen[17651]: NOQUEUE: reject:
> RCPT from [46.102.117.88]:43226:
Hello,
I am facing a problem with postfix. Incoming mails are getting queued
randomly. When I see the log I found the below repeatedly and see that
incoming mails are getting queued.
Oct 21 14:04:06 spamguard postfix/qmgr[30495]: fatal: qmgr_active_feed:
1E8E01426E1: rename from incoming to activ
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 05:10:46PM +0600, Alamgir Shamim wrote:
> Oct 21 14:04:06 spamguard postfix/qmgr[30495]: fatal: qmgr_active_feed:
> 1E8E01426E1: rename from incoming to active: Input/output error
Perhaps you have corruption in the filesystem. Or a security policy
that's denying the renam
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 05:10:46PM +0600, Alamgir Shamim wrote:
>
> > Oct 21 14:04:06 spamguard postfix/qmgr[30495]: fatal: qmgr_active_feed:
> > 1E8E01426E1: rename from incoming to active: Input/output error
>
> Perhaps you have corruption in the filesystem. Or a security po
On Oct 20, 2015, at 7:44 PM, Alex wrote:
> I'd like to obscure the names of the DNSBLs that we use in response to
> emails that are rejected.
Why would you do that? If someone hits your blocks and doesn’t know why they
were blocked you may find yourself on blocklists yourself.
--
she [Esk] wa
I just point everything to http://multirbl.valli.org so they can see if they
are listed on multiple rbl servers.
And imo thats better, then, mailing, getting rejected, by for example spamhaus.
Going to that site, checking, removing.
Mailing again, and now again blocked, other rbl server etc.
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes:
> Eric Abrahamsen:
>> > TLS? In that case you also need two tlsproxy services, each with
>> > their own certificate stuff.
>> >
>> > 1.2.3.5:smtp inet n - n - 1 postscreen
>> > -o tlsproxy_service_name=tlsproxy_1.2.3.5
>> > -o smtpd_service_name=
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:53 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Alex:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to obscure the names of the DNSBLs that we use in response to
>> emails that are rejected. I've set up postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map and
>> it's working properly for most:
>>
>> Oct 20 21:41:36 mail02 postfix/pos
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:38 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
> I just point everything to http://multirbl.valli.org so they can see if they
> are listed on multiple rbl servers.
That's a great idea. How did you configure your system to do that?
> And imo thats better, then, mailing, getting r
On October 22, 2015 12:39:52 AM Alex wrote:
http://rob0.nodns4.us/postscreen.html
I'm unsure what else to do from here.
http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html
point 7
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On October 22, 2015 12:39:52 AM Alex wrote:
>
>> http://rob0.nodns4.us/postscreen.html
>>
>> I'm unsure what else to do from here.
>
> http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html
>
> point 7
Yes, that's exactly what I'm doing, and a
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 07:59:29PM -0400, Alex wrote:
> Oct 21 19:56:10 mail01 postfix/smtpd[20778]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
> from bx1.c4xf.com[66.150.190.74]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable;
> Unverified Client host [bx1.c4xf.com] blocked using
> mykey.dbl.dq.spamhaus.net;
> http://www.spamhaus.org
14 matches
Mail list logo
