Hi, On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:53 AM, Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote: > Alex: >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to obscure the names of the DNSBLs that we use in response to >> emails that are rejected. I've set up postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map and >> it's working properly for most: >> >> Oct 20 21:41:36 mail02 postfix/postscreen[17651]: NOQUEUE: reject: >> RCPT from [46.102.117.88]:43226: 550 5.7.1 Service unavailable; client >> [46.102.117.88] blocked using multiple DNS-based blocklists; >> from=<p...@brimsems.com>, to=<g...@example.com>, proto=ESMTP, >> helo=<scaffold.brimsems.com> >> >> However, there are others where it doesn't seem to apply. Perhaps >> because of the '554 5.7.1' response compared with the '550 5.7.1' from >> above? >> >> Oct 20 21:38:07 mail02 postfix/smtpd[9200]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from >> 14-233-245-104-static.reverse.queryfoundry.net[104.245.233.14]: 554 >> 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Sender address [tr...@spaceinfi.com] >> blocked using mykey.dbl.dq.spamhaus.net; >> http://www.spamhaus.org/query/dbl?domain=spaceinfi.com; >> from=<tr...@spaceinfi.com> to=<beth.campb...@example.com> proto=ESMTP >> helo=<spaceinfi.com> >> >> postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map = >> pcre:$config_directory/postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map.pcre >> >> postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map.pcre: >> !/^mykey\.dbl\.dq\.spamhaus\.net$/ multiple DNS-based blocklists > > Why in heavens name are you using as PCRE map?
Would hash be more appropriate? I believe I got this configuration from rob0's system some time ago, where he used pcre: http://rob0.nodns4.us/postscreen.html I'm unsure what else to do from here. Thanks, Alex