Hi,

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:53 AM, Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
> Alex:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to obscure the names of the DNSBLs that we use in response to
>> emails that are rejected. I've set up postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map and
>> it's working properly for most:
>>
>> Oct 20 21:41:36 mail02 postfix/postscreen[17651]: NOQUEUE: reject:
>> RCPT from [46.102.117.88]:43226: 550 5.7.1 Service unavailable; client
>> [46.102.117.88] blocked using multiple DNS-based blocklists;
>> from=<p...@brimsems.com>, to=<g...@example.com>, proto=ESMTP,
>> helo=<scaffold.brimsems.com>
>>
>> However, there are others where it doesn't seem to apply. Perhaps
>> because of the '554 5.7.1' response compared with the '550 5.7.1' from
>> above?
>>
>> Oct 20 21:38:07 mail02 postfix/smtpd[9200]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
>> 14-233-245-104-static.reverse.queryfoundry.net[104.245.233.14]: 554
>> 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Sender address [tr...@spaceinfi.com]
>> blocked using mykey.dbl.dq.spamhaus.net;
>> http://www.spamhaus.org/query/dbl?domain=spaceinfi.com;
>> from=<tr...@spaceinfi.com> to=<beth.campb...@example.com> proto=ESMTP
>> helo=<spaceinfi.com>
>>
>> postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map =
>>         pcre:$config_directory/postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map.pcre
>>
>> postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map.pcre:
>> !/^mykey\.dbl\.dq\.spamhaus\.net$/         multiple DNS-based blocklists
>
> Why in heavens name are you using as PCRE map?

Would hash be more appropriate? I believe I got this configuration
from rob0's system some time ago, where he used pcre:

http://rob0.nodns4.us/postscreen.html

I'm unsure what else to do from here.

Thanks,
Alex

Reply via email to