Hi all,
I think I just need a four-eye method here, because I simply can't see
what am I doing wrong.
I've tried to install OpenDKIM milter with Postfix - something that is
usually a ruoutine work but I keep getting the same mesage all the time
when I try to send a test mail:
postfix/clean
Istvan Prosinger skrev den 2015-07-03 14:36:
postfix/cleanup[20494]: 06E7312113A: milter-reject: END-OF-MESSAGE
from localhost[127.0.0.1]: 4.7.1 Service unavailable - try again
later; from= to=
means that either opendkim is not started or listning, possible config
error in opendkim.conf ?
c
On 07/02/2015 11:56 PM, King Cao wrote:
Hi Wietse,
Actually it's our relay mta and can not know if it's deliverable or not
until bounced by downsteam...
King:
I ran into this problem when I used Postfix to front a large number of
Plesk (qmail) and CPanel (exim) systems at a Web hosting compa
On 2015-07-03 16:00, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Istvan Prosinger skrev den 2015-07-03 14:36:
postfix/cleanup[20494]: 06E7312113A: milter-reject: END-OF-MESSAGE
from localhost[127.0.0.1]: 4.7.1 Service unavailable - try again
later; from= to=
means that either opendkim is not started or listning, p
Hi,
I've found several websites for configuring backup MX servers
that recommend setting the transport_maps for the primary domains.
This seems wrong to me: the DNS MX record already has this info.
Is there another reason to set the transport_maps for the backup config?
Thanks
John
http://www.
On 2015-07-03 16:00, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Istvan Prosinger skrev den 2015-07-03 14:36:
postfix/cleanup[20494]: 06E7312113A: milter-reject: END-OF-MESSAGE
from localhost[127.0.0.1]: 4.7.1 Service unavailable - try again
later; from= to=
means that either opendkim is not started or listning, p
Hi,
Some time ago I had asked a question about rate limiting email to
sites like gmail and yahoo using transport maps and
destination_concurrency_limit, but I still can't get it right. I'm
trying to throttle traffic to avoid the following restrictions from
sites like google:
Jul 3 12:57:37 prop
Istvan Prosinger skrev den 2015-07-03 18:11:
My initial thought was that it's about Postfix.
can happen if opendkim is started to late ?
in that case try to solve that so opendkim is started before postfix
for the mails in mailq, try
postsuper -r ALL && postfix reload
did this resend m
As per your errors, you send Unsolicited Messages. If that is the case then is
not related to sending rates, but to spam complaints rate.
"Our system has detected an unusual rate of unsolicited mail originating from
your IP address"
1. Recipients must optin. Never send to a list acquired from so
What I can tell at this moment, is that I tried all that.
Although I usually delete the mail queue and then try to send one mail
with mailx, same thing happens.
Nevertheless, it's not about the start sequence, I'm quite sure of that.
This is something very odd.
Now I even tried to recompile Op
On 07/03/2015 03:23 PM, Marius Gologan wrote:
As per your errors, you send Unsolicited Messages. If that is the
case then is not related to sending rates, but to spam complaints
rate. "Our system has detected an unusual rate of unsolicited mail
originating from your IP address"
1. Recipients m
You forward messages repeatedly, flooding this mailing list too.
Google it doesn't think differently, but is very accurate. Same is hotmail,
even more accurate.
Things are not ok on your side.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Regan [mailto:mysqlstud...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 3, 2015
On Friday, July 3, 2015, Istvan Prosinger wrote:
> What I can tell at this moment, is that I tried all that.
> Although I usually delete the mail queue and then try to send one mail
> with mailx, same thing happens.
> Nevertheless, it's not about the start sequence, I'm quite sure of that.
>
> Th
On 7/3/2015 9:56 AM, John Gateley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've found several websites for configuring backup MX servers
> that recommend setting the transport_maps for the primary domains.
> This seems wrong to me: the DNS MX record already has this info.
> Is there another reason to set the transport_ma
On Jul 3, 2015, at 2:06 PM, Alex Regan wrote:
> How do people generally deal with these?
They, and the some of the network around them, are promoted to my packet filter
for a few months. If I see nothing in 3 months or so, they get unblocked. To
easy the load on my packet filter, not on the s
On 07/03/2015 04:07 PM, Marius Gologan wrote:
You forward messages repeatedly, flooding this mailing list too.
I received a Wietse automated message saying they were rejected for
various reasons pertaining to words in the body and was told to retry.
Google it doesn't think differently, bu
Hi,
How do people generally deal with these?
They, and the some of the network around them, are promoted to my
packet filter for a few months. If I see nothing in 3 months or so,
they get unblocked. To easy the load on my packet filter, not on the
spammers.
These are messages being forwarded
On 7/3/15 5:20 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 7/3/2015 9:56 AM, John Gateley wrote:
...
...
But if you're sending to the same IP as published in DNS, no real
reason to use a transport entry.
Thanks for the confirmation
Note secondary MX servers are no longer considered a benefit. ...
This i
I use
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org,
reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
which I find catches about 98% of SPAM.
I also receive mail at an address that is a forwarding mailbox and
sends mail to my Postfix server. The provi
On 07/03/2015 07:20 PM, Alex Regan wrote:
We are not the originators of these messages. The users on this system
have a .forward file that's forwarding these messages through to gmail.
Then if you or your customers didn't originate them, then they should
not have been sent from your server. I
I have a postfix mail gateway sitting in front of my internal Exchange 2013
mail servers. Currently have my "/etc/postfix/transport" file set to send mail
to only one of those Exchange servers:
"domain.comsmtp:192.168.1.108"
Would like to setup multiple internal Exchange Server entries
21 matches
Mail list logo
