Re: Is the development of Milters still encouraged

On 06/25/2015 06:31 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 02:07:37PM +0530, Ram wrote: I see that milter.org has been shut down. A commercial decision by the new owners of Sendmail. This does not remove support for the milter API from Postfix. Now I am wondering if milters ar

Re: Is the development of Milters still encouraged

Ram: > On 06/25/2015 06:31 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 02:07:37PM +0530, Ram wrote: > > > >> I see that milter.org has been shut down. > > A commercial decision by the new owners of Sendmail. This does > > not remove support for the milter API from Postfix. > > > >> Now

Re: Newbie question: purpose of mydomain

John Gateley: > Another newbie question: > > I am setting up Postfix to replace a long-standing qmail system. > My plan is for all domains to be Virtual Mailbox domains. > > My question: what do I set mydomain to? > > I have myhostname set to mx[12].example.com, > myorigin to myhostname, and myd

Re: Newbie question: purpose of mydomain

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > John Gateley: > > Another newbie question: > > > > I am setting up Postfix to replace a long-standing qmail system. > > My plan is for all domains to be Virtual Mailbox domains. > > > > My question: what do I set mydomain to? > > > > I have

Re: Newbie question: purpose of mydomain

On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:20:05PM -0500, John Gateley wrote: > My question: what do I set mydomain to? > > I have myhostname set to mx[12].example.com, > myorigin to myhostname, and mydestination to myhostname, localhost. > > The docs for mydomain say it is used " $mydomain >

Pyzor at SMTP connection

Hello everyone, I'm scratching my head with a curiosity. I want to play a bit with a filter during the SMTP connection. I don't want to use amavis nor spamassassin in this case, but I want something much faster and less resource intensive. 1. I run my own public Pyzor sever (and Redis cache)

Re: Pyzor at SMTP connection

Marius Gologan: > So far, I think would be nice to have a way similar to check_policy_service, > but which would send DATA too. I think Milter/Filter are the right > directions, but I can't find a way to combine them with spawn as I did with > check_policy_service. I think that Milter would be the

RE: Pyzor at SMTP connection

I will move in that direction. Thank you. Marius -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 9:01 PM To: Postfix users Subject: Re: Pyzor at SMTP connection Marius Gologan: > So

[no subject]

Greetings, I would like to remove HELO and DNSBL checking for one domain on a postfix server that receives mail for multiple domains. From what I have read, it sounds like it should be as simple as moving the "smtpd_helo_required=no" and "smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,per

Re: (untitled)

On 6/29/2015 2:14 PM, Isaac Grover wrote: > Greetings, > > I would like to remove HELO and DNSBL checking for one domain on a > postfix server that receives mail for multiple domains. From what I > have read, it sounds like it should be as simple as moving the > "smtpd_helo_required=no" and > "sm

appropriate notificaton back to Postfix by contennt-filters that DISCARD?

I've amavisd+spamassassin setup as a post-queue content-filter. If a message PASSes postscreen+smtpd_mumble_restrictions, it's handed off to amavisd+SA for content analysis. Currently, amavisd is configured to 'D_DISCARD' mail that scores above a specified level. It works as intended. That DI

Re: appropriate notificaton back to Postfix by contennt-filters that DISCARD?

On 6/29/2015 7:09 PM, PGNd wrote: > I've amavisd+spamassassin setup as a post-queue content-filter. > > If a message PASSes postscreen+smtpd_mumble_restrictions, it's handed off to > amavisd+SA for content analysis. > > Currently, amavisd is configured to 'D_DISCARD' mail that scores above a >

Re: appropriate notificaton back to Postfix by contennt-filters that DISCARD?

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015, at 08:23 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > > That DISCARD action is logged in the amavisd logs, but occurs silently from > > Postfix's perspective -- it's not notified, and does not log the message > > disposition in its log. > > > This is correct. From postfix's perspective, the mes

Re: appropriate notificaton back to Postfix by contennt-filters that DISCARD?

On 06/30/2015 03:47 PM, PGNd wrote: > Understood. This question's been about one piece; my complete setup > currently has several inbound stages now in-place, in order, > > postscreen + weighted RBLs > smtpd_mumble_restrictions > a prequeue proxy-filter policybank instance of amavisd for extensi

Re: appropriate notificaton back to Postfix by contennt-filters that DISCARD?

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015, at 08:55 PM, Peter wrote: > > I continue to waffle re: the advantages/disadvantages of moving clamav &/or > > SA postqueue. I've found bits-and-pieces of both pro & con arguments, but > > nothing yet that's tilted strongly one way or the other. > > What I do ... and reco

Re: appropriate notificaton back to Postfix by contennt-filters that DISCARD?

On 6/29/2015 10:47 PM, PGNd wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015, at 08:23 PM, Noel Jones wrote: >>> That DISCARD action is logged in the amavisd logs, but occurs silently from >>> Postfix's perspective -- it's not notified, and does not log the message >>> disposition in its log. >>> >> This is correct

Re: appropriate notificaton back to Postfix by contennt-filters that DISCARD?

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015, at 09:32 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > When mail is discarded, no one is notified. From the end-user's > point of view -- both the sender and receiver -- the mail is > silently lost, and mail is unreliable. Although I find users tend to squeak if the server isn't trashing "known