Hello,
while checking TLS to a destination domain I noticed a difference.
posttls-finger say "Verified" but log say (only) "Trusted".
# posttls-finger -c -F /etc/ssl/mail/trusted_cas.pem avira.com
posttls-finger: mx1.c01.avira.com[212.79.247.134]:25: subjectAltName:
mx.ames.avira.net
postt
On 2014-12-09 10:07, Jose Borges Ferreira wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Patrik Båt wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> Is it possible to not attach the email when generating a bounce?
>>
>> What happens if I set this to zero? bounce_size_limit (default: 5)
>>
> bounce_size_limit = 0 is "no limit
Just came across the following logged message which failed to be parsed
by our log parser:
postfix/anvil[29988]: statistics: max message rate 4/60s for
([2001:1470:ff80::25]:10088:2001:1470:ff80:88::80:c) at Dec 8 19:26:44
Btw, 10088 is a port number, not part of an IP address.
Perhaps an IP
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 01:13:22PM +0100, A. Schulze wrote:
> while checking TLS to a destination domain I noticed a difference.
> posttls-finger say "Verified" but log say (only) "Trusted".
The posttls-finger(1) utility defaults to the "dane" security level
when TLSA records are present and "sec
While updateing the log parsing script I came across this :
TLS status is check at connect time and per destination with the
following values "Anonymous" , "Verified" , "Trusted" or "Untrusted".
It makes sense because is related with the destination.
We have a table and use queue id as an identi
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:04:57PM +, Jose Borges Ferreira wrote:
> The problem, for me, is to correlate the smtp proc id with the
> message. Is it possible to have a extra key=value pair in the "final
> smtp log line" ?
TLS audit logging that includes queue-id data, is planned for the
releas
Mark Martinec:
> Just came across the following logged message which failed to be parsed
> by our log parser:
>
> postfix/anvil[29988]: statistics: max message rate 4/60s for
> ([2001:1470:ff80::25]:10088:2001:1470:ff80:88::80:c) at Dec 8 19:26:44
>
> Btw, 10088 is a port number, not part of an
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 01:26:42PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> The anvil service stores information under a key of service:client.
> Apparently, your master.cf service is [2001:1470:ff80::25]:10088,
> and in this case the client is 2001:1470:ff80:88::80:c.
What if Mark also had a service entry
Hi.
We use smtplib in python to send mail through postfix. As I saw from
tcpdump smtplib does not set "Date:" field, so I suspect postfix does
that. Now, as I see postfix sets date as:
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:40:50 -0800 (PST)
According to rfc 5322 3.6.1. "The Origination Date Field" last part
Am 10.12.2014 um 20:17 schrieb Peter Volkov:
We use smtplib in python to send mail through postfix. As I saw from
tcpdump smtplib does not set "Date:" field, so I suspect postfix does
that. Now, as I see postfix sets date as:
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:40:50 -0800 (PST)
According to rfc 5322 3.6
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 01:26:42PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > The anvil service stores information under a key of service:client.
> > Apparently, your master.cf service is [2001:1470:ff80::25]:10088,
> > and in this case the client is 2001:1470:ff80:88::80:c.
>
> What if
Peter Volkov:
> Hi.
>
> We use smtplib in python to send mail through postfix. As I saw from
> tcpdump smtplib does not set "Date:" field, so I suspect postfix does
> that. Now, as I see postfix sets date as:
> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:40:50 -0800 (PST)
The (PST) is a comment. Surely, their pars
В Ср, 10/12/2014 в 14:35 -0500, Wietse Venema пишет:
> Peter Volkov:
> > We use smtplib in python to send mail through postfix. As I saw from
> > tcpdump smtplib does not set "Date:" field, so I suspect postfix does
> > that. Now, as I see postfix sets date as:
> > Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:40:50 -
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 02:27:14PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> In the ``service:client'' counter ID, the service is the name in
> the master.cf first column. The anvil service does not require that
> this has a port (but TCP does).
Sure, but (perhaps I am missing something) "service:client" wit
Peter Volkov:
> ? ??, 10/12/2014 ? 14:35 -0500, Wietse Venema ?:
> > Peter Volkov:
> > > We use smtplib in python to send mail through postfix. As I saw from
> > > tcpdump smtplib does not set "Date:" field, so I suspect postfix does
> > > that. Now, as I see postfix sets date as:
> > > Date: W
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 02:27:14PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > In the ``service:client'' counter ID, the service is the name in
> > the master.cf first column. The anvil service does not require that
> > this has a port (but TCP does).
>
> Sure, but (perhaps I am missing
li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> Am 10.12.2014 um 20:17 schrieb Peter Volkov:
>> We use smtplib in python to send mail through postfix. As I saw from
>> tcpdump smtplib does not set "Date:" field, so I suspect postfix does
>> that. Now, as I see postfix sets date as:
>> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:40:50 -08
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 03:49:18PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Sure, but (perhaps I am missing something) "service:client" with
> > "client" an "abbreviated" IPv6 address is subject to collisions
> > when some services end in a numeric ":port" and others do not.
>
> There can be no TCP servic
Hi all,
I'm running Postfix 2.11.0 on Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS on multiple m3.xlarge
instances (15GB RAM) on Amazon EC2. There's a milter plugged in. This setup has
been running without problems on Postfix 2.9.6 on Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS on bare
metal machines (32GB RAM) for years. Only when we ported it
Am 10.12.2014 um 22:59 schrieb Julian Mehnle:
I'm running Postfix 2.11.0 on Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS on multiple m3.xlarge
instances (15GB RAM) on Amazon EC2. There's a milter plugged in. This setup has
been running without problems on Postfix 2.9.6 on Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS on bare
metal machines (32G
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 01:59:37PM -0800, Julian Mehnle wrote:
> I'm running Postfix 2.11.0 on Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS on multiple m3.xlarge
> instances (15GB RAM) on Amazon EC2. There's a milter plugged in. This
> setup has been running without problems on Postfix 2.9.6 on Ubuntu 12.04.2
> LTS on bare
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:04:57PM +, Jose Borges Ferreira wrote:
>
>> The problem, for me, is to correlate the smtp proc id with the
>> message. Is it possible to have a extra key=value pair in the "final
>> smtp log line" ?
>
> TLS au
My question is very similar to Richard Laysell's question:
On 4/7/2014 8:42 AM, Richard Laysell wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> What is the best way of dealing with pests like this?
>
> Apr 7 12:52:40 polyphemus postfix/smtpd[24765]: lost connection after
> AUTH from unknown[78.188.45.153]
> Apr 7 12
deoren:
> My question is very similar to Richard Laysell's question:
>
> On 4/7/2014 8:42 AM, Richard Laysell wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > What is the best way of dealing with pests like this?
> >
> > Apr 7 12:52:40 polyphemus postfix/smtpd[24765]: lost connection after
> > AUTH from
On 12/10/14, 3:46 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Peter Volkov:
? ??, 10/12/2014 ? 14:35 -0500, Wietse Venema ?:
Peter Volkov:
We use smtplib in python to send mail through postfix. As I saw from
tcpdump smtplib does not set "Date:" field, so I suspect postfix does
that. Now, as I see postfix set
25 matches
Mail list logo
