On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 03:49:18PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Sure, but (perhaps I am missing something) "service:client" with
> > "client" an "abbreviated" IPv6 address is subject to collisions
> > when some services end in a numeric ":port" and others do not.
>
> There can be no TCP service without port. Your objection is not
> valid for IPv6.
Sorry, not taking the time to think this through, indeed what is
optional in a service name is the address not the port. Apologies
for engaging mouth before brain.
--
Viktor.
