Re: Mail delivery problem.. intermittent .. I dont see what could be wrong...

2014-02-18 Thread Matthew McGehrin
It also seems like you have a permissions error as well with your quarantine directories. Feb 17 16:49:52 mail amavis[16508]: (16508-03) (!)run_av (ClamAV-clamd) FAILED - unexpected , output="/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20140217T163033-16508/parts: lstat() failed: Permission denied. ERROR\n"

Message reject based on absense of a header(s)

2014-02-18 Thread Vladimir Kozlov
I'd like to reject messages without some headers (say, Date: or Message-ID:). As far as I understand, headers-checks and body-checks could be done as described at http://www.postfix.org/BACKSCATTER_README.html The only question I could not find answer to is: how to write regexp for _absence_ o

Re: Message reject based on absense of a header(s)

2014-02-18 Thread Noel Jones
On 2/18/2014 10:54 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote: > I'd like to reject messages without some headers (say, Date: or > Message-ID:). > As far as I understand, headers-checks and body-checks could be done > as described at http://www.postfix.org/BACKSCATTER_README.html > > The only question I could not

Re: Message reject based on absense of a header(s)

2014-02-18 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, postfix users! >> I'd like to reject messages without some headers (say, Date: or >> Message-ID:). >> As far as I understand, headers-checks and body-checks could be done >> as described at http://www.postfix.org/BACKSCATTER_README.html >> >> The only question I could not find answer t

Re: Message reject based on absense of a header(s)

2014-02-18 Thread Andreas Schulze
Noel Jones: To detect missing headers you'll need a content filter such as SpamAssassin. opendmarc-milter implement a test to verify RFC5322-required headers (RFC5322 3.6) The feature is new, available in the 1.2.0 Beta only. (https://sourceforge.net/projects/opendmarc/files/Pre-Releases/)

Re: Message reject based on absense of a header(s)

2014-02-18 Thread Noel Jones
On 2/18/2014 3:41 PM, Andreas Schulze wrote: > > Noel Jones: > >> To detect missing headers you'll need a content filter such as >> SpamAssassin. > > opendmarc-milter implement a test to verify RFC5322-required headers > (RFC5322 3.6) > The feature is new, available in the 1.2.0 Beta only. > (ht

Re: Message reject based on absense of a header(s)

2014-02-18 Thread Wietse Venema
Noel Jones: > A few years ago I tried rejecting messages with no Message-ID. Much > to my surprise, there were far more false-positives than actual spam > rejected. I doubt the situation has changed much since then, but YMMV. That was my experience, too. There was enough legitimate mail without M

I have screwed it up

2014-02-18 Thread edwinh
Hi all, I've been using postfix with a smarthost, and my ISP has just required me to use a new smarthost with authentication. After some struggle, I eventually got it to work, but now the incoming email that fetchmail is delivering to postfix is also forwarded to the smarthost, and therefore

RE: I have screwed it up

2014-02-18 Thread Terry Gilsenan
-Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of edw...@netsensecomputers.com.au Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2014 11:25 AM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: I have screwed it up Hi all, I've been using postfix with a sma

Re: I have screwed it up

2014-02-18 Thread Noel Jones
On 2/18/2014 7:24 PM, edw...@netsensecomputers.com.au wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been using postfix with a smarthost, and my ISP has just > required me to use a new smarthost with authentication. After some > struggle, I eventually got it to work, but now the incoming email > that fetchmail is deli

Re: I have screwed it up

2014-02-18 Thread edwinh
Noel & Terry, That was mu first thought as well, but I think it's OK; I've copied my main.cf file below. Thanks. # See /usr/share/postfix/main.cf.dist for a commented, more complete version # Debian specific: Specifying a file name will cause the first # line of that file to be used as t

RE: I have screwed it up

2014-02-18 Thread Terry Gilsenan
-Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of edw...@netsensecomputers.com.au Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2014 11:39 AM To: postfix users Subject: Re: I have screwed it up Noel & Terry, That was mu first thought as well, b

Re: I have screwed it up

2014-02-18 Thread edwinh
OK, so I changed the main.cf: Changed Line myorigin = $mydomain New Line mydomain = netsensecomputers.com.au Reloaded, and behaviour is still the same. I wonder, though, what the domain should be: the postfix logs show that fetchmail is reporting the ema

RE: I have screwed it up

2014-02-18 Thread Terry Gilsenan
-Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of edw...@netsensecomputers.com.au Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2014 12:48 PM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: I have screwed it up OK, so I changed the main.cf: Changed

Re: Message reject based on absense of a header(s)

2014-02-18 Thread Michael J Wise
On Feb 18, 2014, at 2:57 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Noel Jones: >> A few years ago I tried rejecting messages with no Message-ID. Much >> to my surprise, there were far more false-positives than actual spam >> rejected. I doubt the situation has changed much since then, but YMMV. > > That was m

qmgr_queue_throttle not fired up in 2.12.20140209

2014-02-18 Thread Birta Levente
Hi I have a problem with Postfix 2.12 Snapshot 20140209. The qmgr_queue_throttle never fired up for destinations which go through slow transport and obviously the delivery never suspended to these few destinations. Mails which go out "normally", i.e. not through slow transport, seems to throttle: