On Feb 18, 2014, at 2:57 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:

> Noel Jones:
>> A few years ago I tried rejecting messages with no Message-ID. Much
>> to my surprise, there were far more false-positives than actual spam
>> rejected.  I doubt the situation has changed much since then, but YMMV.
> 
> That was my experience, too. There was enough legitimate mail
> without Message-ID that this was not a good test for spamminess.


Granted, but …

At the very least, such traffic should have to be safe-sendered to keep it out 
of the Junk.
IMHO.

Aloha,
Michael.
-- 
"Please have your Internet License             
 and Usenet Registration handy..."

Reply via email to