Am 2013-04-24 15:59, schrieb Tony Nelson:
After reading through the recent Postscreen DNSBL threads I decided
to give it a try.
I used Rob's example from http://rob0.nodns4.us/postscreen.html [1]
as a leaping off point, but chose to leave pipelining disabled until
I'm sure I understand what I
Am 29.04.2013 01:52, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> On 4/28/2013 9:52 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 28.04.2013 14:41, schrieb Wietse Venema:
>>> Reindl Harald:
454: smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated, defer_unauth_destination
554: smtpd_relay_restric
Am 29.04.2013 06:10, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> On 4/28/2013 7:33 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> There is an important difference, which is why the defer variant
>> is used as a safety net, and the use-case is precisely when the
>> client is an MTA.
>
> Apparently I didn't make my point clear, whic
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 09:48:00AM +0200, Marko Weber | ZBF wrote:
> Am 2013-04-24 15:59, schrieb Tony Nelson:
> >After reading through the recent Postscreen DNSBL threads I decided
> >to give it a try.
> >
> >I used Rob's example from http://rob0.nodns4.us/postscreen.html [1]
> >as a leaping off p
