On Jan 12, 2013, at 00:07, mo...@arcor.de wrote:
>> Please note that catchall addresses are evil and strongly discouraged.
>
> Whys that? Im the only recipient of all mail directed at domainA.org (so no
> "spying") and as such can use websiteisignedupw...@domaina.org so I can
> always tell whic
Hi!
I have the following parameter in main.cf (Postfix 2.9):
proxy_read_maps = proxy:pgsql:/etc/postfix/client_access-sql.cf, [...]
smtpd_client_restrictions = check_client_access
proxy:pgsql:/etc/postfix/client_access-sql.cf, [...]
... which works for unique IP lookups, but I wish to use CIDR p
Hi All,
We have ec2 instance in Amazon web service. i've configured local postifix to
use external relay server, DNS records created using Amazon Route 53 and
created SPF & DKIM, everything works fine when sent mail through webmail
(configured in relay server).
When mail sent from ec2 inst
LEVAI Daniel skrev den 2013-01-12 09:51:
... which works for unique IP lookups, but I wish to use CIDR
postfixes.
Is it possible to combine the cidr: lookups with
proxy:pgsql?
http://pastebin.com/RMKBmW0p
postgresql support cidr, so its just create it :=)
untested since i have not compiled
On szo, jan 12, 2013 at 13:17:45 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> LEVAI Daniel skrev den 2013-01-12 09:51:
>
> >... which works for unique IP lookups, but I wish to use CIDR
> >postfixes.
> >Is it possible to combine the cidr: lookups with
> >proxy:pgsql?
>
> http://pastebin.com/RMKBmW0p
>
> postg
LEVAI Daniel skrev den 2013-01-12 13:51:
How should I put this... My question is not in regards to how to
store
IP networks (w/ CIDR postfix) in PostgreSQL; this is somewhat given.
telnet 127.0.0.0/16 25
works ?
postfix only query single ip, not ip ranges
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 01:51:26PM +0100, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
> How should I put this... My question is not in regards to how to store
> IP networks (w/ CIDR postfix) in PostgreSQL; this is somewhat given.
PostgreSQL handles CIDR with some special functions and operators. See
http://www.postgresql
Richard Damon:
> On 1/11/13 9:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Robert Moskowitz:
> >> On 01/11/2013 09:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >>> Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO
> >>> header. I have asked you this before, and I think I will ignore
> >>> your email until you
Am 12.01.2013 14:49, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Richard Damon:
>> On 1/11/13 9:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Robert Moskowitz:
On 01/11/2013 09:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO
> header. I have asked you this before, and
On 1/12/2013 7:49 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Richard Damon:
>> On 1/11/13 9:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Robert Moskowitz:
On 01/11/2013 09:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO
> header. I have asked you this before, and I t
Am 11.01.2013 15:33, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
>
> On 01/11/2013 09:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO
>> header. I have asked you this before, and I think I will ignore
>> your email until you play by the same rules as everyone else.
>
Am 12.01.2013 15:18, schrieb Matthias Andree:
> Am 11.01.2013 15:33, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
>> I WILL work more at paying attention to what works here.
>
> Your headers reveal you are using Thunderbird; it can't be that hard to
> click "List reply" or whatever the button inscription translate
On szo, jan 12, 2013 at 14:00:08 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> LEVAI Daniel skrev den 2013-01-12 13:51:
>
> >How should I put this... My question is not in regards to how to
> >store
> >IP networks (w/ CIDR postfix) in PostgreSQL; this is somewhat given.
>
> telnet 127.0.0.0/16 25
>
> works ?
>
On szo, jan 12, 2013 at 14:11:12 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 01:51:26PM +0100, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
> > How should I put this... My question is not in regards to how to store
> > IP networks (w/ CIDR postfix) in PostgreSQL; this is somewhat given.
>
> PostgreSQL handles CI
On 12-01-13 15:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> but as said - there are a lot of mailing-lists out there which are
> configured by morons where this all does not work as it should or
> is destroyed because many users on other lists are doing permanently
> "reply-all" and if your server is configured l
On 12-01-13 17:39, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
> On szo, jan 12, 2013 at 14:11:12 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 01:51:26PM +0100, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
>>> How should I put this... My question is not in regards to how to store
>>> IP networks (w/ CIDR postfix) in PostgreSQL; this is
LEVAI Daniel skrev den 2013-01-12 17:34:
Sorry but I think you're totally confused about the question.
then explain proxy: more in detail for what you want, maybe with a log
snippet of what does not work
Am 12.01.2013 17:45, schrieb Tom Hendrikx:
> On 12-01-13 15:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> but as said - there are a lot of mailing-lists out there which are
>> configured by morons where this all does not work as it should or
>> is destroyed because many users on other lists are doing permanentl
I apologize if this is outside the bounds of this list. I am using
Cyrus-SASL2 with Postfix. It works fine. It is configured to use:
"auxprop_plugin: sql" and has the log set as: "log_level: 0", obviously
all sans quotation marks. My question is why is so much redundant data
logged to the "/var/log
Hi Guys,
We have lots of SMTPs running on different IPs sending to many different
destinations.
So what I need to do is, if any of this SMTP receives an email to specific
destination, the mail must be relayed to a specific SMTP.
We work with named transports for this specific domains, so I gue
Hi Ramesh,
I had a similar problem, but not using Amazon services.
I'd suggest you to check your DKIM configuration since its little bit tricky.
This is my suggestion:
1) Check your trusted-hosts file and make sure your sending server's IP is on
that list
2) Check your key list and make sure yo
Also, as far as I know postfix won't add any SPF header to your sending
messages. I think it will check for SPF for incoming mail only, so check your
domain and see if your DNS has any TXT valid SPF record.
-- Rafael
Em 12/01/2013, às 07:50, Ramesh escreveu:
>
> Hi All,
>
> We have ec2 ins
Am 12.01.2013 21:32, schrieb Rafael Azevedo - IAGENTE:
> Also, as far as I know postfix won't add any SPF header to your sending
> messages. I think it will check for SPF for
> incoming mail only, so check your domain and see if your DNS has any TXT
> valid SPF record.
there is nothing like "S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/01/13 06:15, Reindl Harald wrote:
> i DO want supress duplicates it works on a lower level -> dbmail
>
> i am receiving around 500 mails per day with duplicates still
> supressed so i do not need them too in a different folder to save
> two seco
Am 12.01.2013 22:35, schrieb Peter:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 13/01/13 06:15, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> i DO want supress duplicates it works on a lower level -> dbmail
>>
>> i am receiving around 500 mails per day with duplicates still
>> supressed so i do not need
Rafael Azevedo - IAGENTE:
> We're having problems to deliver to specific destination because
> of too many opened connections from the same domain (its spread
> over lots of SMTP servers connection to the same destination,
> hitting the sending limits), so I guess if I just centralize this
> destin
On 1/12/13 8:49 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Richard Damon:
>> On 1/11/13 9:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Robert Moskowitz:
On 01/11/2013 09:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO
> header. I have asked you this before, and I thi
Am 13.01.2013 03:43, schrieb Richard Damon:
> I will note that even for this list, there is the encouragement to use
> "Reply All", as it is set so that "Reply" just goes back to the original
> poster, unless they have specifically set Reply-To:, and it is an
> unfortunate situation that for "Repl
28 matches
Mail list logo
