Am 12.01.2013 14:49, schrieb Wietse Venema: > Richard Damon: >> On 1/11/13 9:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: >>> Robert Moskowitz: >>>> On 01/11/2013 09:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: >>>>> Robert, please configure your mail reader to respect the REPLY-TO >>>>> header. I have asked you this before, and I think I will ignore >>>>> your email until you play by the same rules as everyone else. >>>> Sorry about that last transmission. >>>> >>>> Your request would be reasonable if every list I am on worked the same way. >>> If your mail program requires human effort to respect the Reply-To: >>> header, then you are using the wrong mail program to participate >>> on a mailing list. I will ignore your posts until that is fixed. >>> >> Wietse, >> I believe that the poster was trying to explain a human engineering > > Stop whining. Use software that is competent at handling mailing > list correspondence. It's not rocket science.
Wietse is is NOT the software i currently receive 20 mailing-lists and they behave all different between "reply to list" is not possible at all and "reply" leaves only the sender without list, so you have to use reply-all there and if you had some posts on such a bullshit-setup you are trained to "reply-all" but yes, i agree that it should be not a proböem to verify the RCPT before press send - maybe it sooner or later saves someones job... BTW: it happens randomly to you too hit "reply-all" on this list :-) ________________________________ a bad example is the mysql-mailing list: * explain the idiots there reply to liust and not to all * you get back from other members "but i WANT to have two copies" * they are fucking too stupid to send bulk-headers to tell autorepsonders not respond to the list-messages, no idea which monkey at oracle is responsible for this
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
