Hello
is it possible to block all a domain using smtpd_sender_restrictions ?
@spammers.com DISCARD
Thank you
On 12/12/2012 02:01 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Muzaffer:
virtual_mailbox_domains = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_domains_maps.cf
virtual_mailbox_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_mailbox_maps.cf
..
Dec 12 01:11:27 kartagis postfix/trivial-rewrite[24213]: warning: connect
to mysql serve
On 12/12/2012 11:39 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
is it possible to block all a domain using smtpd_sender_restrictions ?
@spammers.com DISCARD
Thank you
Read http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_sender_restrictions
Muzaffer,
On 10/12/2012 16:09, The Doctor wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 02:59:25PM +, Duane Hill wrote:
On Monday, 10 December, 2012 at 14:49:47 UTC, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
confabulated:
Direct Question:
How can postfix used TNEF without an external agent
such as Amavis or MailSCanner?
There's Y
On Tue, December 11, 2012 8:16 pm, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 12/11/2012 2:02 PM, Gary Baribault wrote:
>> Oh no!! Your curiosity got me to read it too .. countdown has
>> started to armageddon, 10 days and counting!!
>>
> Somehow, Armageddon seems wrong for the Mayan end-of-time.
> https://www.youtube
On 12/11/2012 2:03 AM, martijn.list wrote:
> I guess in practice hardly no one will use it in this form but since I'm
> working on a web gui on which users can enter some RBL syntax I had to
> check what formats are accepted or not.
Then you need to read the RFC here:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/r
On 12/12/2012 01:00 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 12/11/2012 2:03 AM, martijn.list wrote:
I guess in practice hardly no one will use it in this form but since I'm
working on a web gui on which users can enter some RBL syntax I had to
check what formats are accepted or not.
Then you need to read
Our client's postfix servers are being frequently getting attacks using
compromised accounts
In most cases it seems the spammer simply uses a phished
username/password , sends a whole lot of 419ers until we manually change
the password , but the damage is already done
Implementing ratelimits
Hi,
look at postfwd.
Cheers,
Nik
Ram schrieb:
>Our client's postfix servers are being frequently getting attacks using
>
>compromised accounts
>In most cases it seems the spammer simply uses a phished
>username/password , sends a whole lot of 419ers until we manually
>change
>the password
On Wednesday 12/12/2012 at 8:48 am, Ram wrote:
Our client's postfix servers are being frequently getting attacks
using compromised accounts
In most cases it seems the spammer simply uses a phished
username/password , sends a whole lot of 419ers until we manually
change the password , but t
Frank Bonnet skrev den 12-12-2012 10:39:
is it possible to block all a domain using smtpd_sender_restrictions
?
@spammers.com DISCARD
remove @
if its a subdomain its .example.org DISCARD
its just that this helps other spammers use your domain as sender, with
exspands the problem
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:39:23AM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> is it possible to block all a domain using
> smtpd_sender_restrictions ?
>
> @spammers.com DISCARD
First, why/who do you want to block? Almost all spam is sent with
forged sender addresses, not the actual spammer's address. Blockin
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 08:18:34PM +0530, Ram wrote:
> Our client's postfix servers are being frequently getting attacks
> using compromised accounts
> In most cases it seems the spammer simply uses a phished
> username/password , sends a whole lot of 419ers until we manually
> change the password
Hi, all,
My question may be OT but I'd like ask here so please forgive me.
I have a mail server use postfix/courier and few of our users report
having problem if they use Gmail to retrieve emails from my server. I
googled and it seems Gmail is tighten up its security. The are people
have the
J Gao:
> Hi, all,
>
> My question may be OT but I'd like ask here so please forgive me.
>
> I have a mail server use postfix/courier and few of our users report
> having problem if they use Gmail to retrieve emails from my server. I
That would be a question for the COURIER mailing list.
Postfi
On 12/12/2012 12:44 PM, J Gao wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> My question may be OT but I'd like ask here so please forgive me.
>
> I have a mail server use postfix/courier and few of our users report
> having problem if they use Gmail to retrieve emails from my server.
> I googled and it seems Gmail is ti
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 1:44 PM, J Gao wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> My question may be OT but I'd like ask here so please forgive me.
>
> I have a mail server use postfix/courier and few of our users report
> having problem if they use Gmail to retrieve emails from my server. I
> googled and it seems Gm
On 12-12-12 11:54 AM, Javier Henderson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 1:44 PM, J Gao mailto:j...@veecall.com>> wrote:
Hi, all,
My question may be OT but I'd like ask here so please forgive me.
I have a mail server use postfix/courier and few of our users report
having proble
J Gao skrev den 12-12-2012 19:44:
http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/gmail/uPP9EsiY1rA
did you google free certs ?
start point is http://www.cacert.org/
self signed have always being a bad idear, free signers is accepted if
you can get google to use cacert public root certs
i j
On 12-12-12 12:12 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
J Gao skrev den 12-12-2012 19:44:
http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/gmail/uPP9EsiY1rA
did you google free certs ?
start point is http://www.cacert.org/
self signed have always being a bad idear, free signers is accepted if
you can get
Ali Jawad skrev den 12-12-2012 21:10:
How can I change this ?
is /etc/hosts correct ?
what is your login shell telling ?
does it show unknown ?
order in /etc/hosts is important that fqdn must be first listed after
each ip
# incorrect
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
# correct
1
Hi Benny
Thank you for the prompt reply, basically I want it to show information
other than what is in the hosts file, I do have postfix with 7 instances
and I want each instance to show it's own IP, instead it is showing the
hostname in /etc/hosts
Regards
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Benny P
Ali Jawad skrev den 12-12-2012 21:35:
Thank you for the prompt reply, basically I want it to show
information other than what is in the hosts file,
why ?
I do have postfix with 7 instances and I want each instance to
show it's own IP, instead it is showing the hostname in /etc/hosts
do you
I just upgraded my Ubuntu server from 10.04 to 12.04 which upgraded Postfix to
2.9.1-4. The postfix server sits behind my firewall, in front of my corporate
Exchange servers.
After the upgrade I found that my exchange servers would/could no longer send
mail. I got the following error:
Dec 12
On 12/12/12 18:05, Tony Nelson wrote:
I just upgraded my Ubuntu server from 10.04 to 12.04 which upgraded
Postfix to 2.9.1-4. The postfix server sits behind my firewall, in
front of my corporate Exchange servers.
After the upgrade I found that my exchange servers would/could no
longer send
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 07:05:51 PM Tony Nelson wrote:
> I just upgraded my Ubuntu server from 10.04 to 12.04 which upgraded Postfix
> to 2.9.1-4. The postfix server sits behind my firewall, in front of my
> corporate Exchange servers.
>
> After the upgrade I found that my exchange server
On Dec 12, 2012, at 7:10 PM, Will wrote:
On 12/12/12 18:05, Tony Nelson wrote:
I just upgraded my Ubuntu server from 10.04 to 12.04 which upgraded Postfix to
2.9.1-4. The postfix server sits behind my firewall, in front of my corporate
Exchange servers.
After the upgrade I found that my exch
On Dec 12, 2012, at 7:20 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 07:05:51 PM Tony Nelson wrote:
>> I just upgraded my Ubuntu server from 10.04 to 12.04 which upgraded Postfix
>> to 2.9.1-4. The postfix server sits behind my firewall, in front of my
>> corporate Exchange serv
On 12/12/2012 6:05 PM, Tony Nelson wrote:
> I think it's in my best interest to get TLS operational again.
So, you encrypt the transmission from the internal corporate groupware
server to the gateway server via a private network that you completely
control. But then you relay the same message ov
Am 13.12.2012 07:26, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> On 12/12/2012 6:05 PM, Tony Nelson wrote:
>
>> I think it's in my best interest to get TLS operational again.
>
> So, you encrypt the transmission from the internal corporate groupware
> server to the gateway server via a private network that you co
30 matches
Mail list logo
