Postfix with Active directory

2012-11-27 Thread Muhammad Yousuf Khan
Newbie Alert! :) i am using Postfix with maildir and i want my mailboxes to be integrated with my active directly windows 2003 server. i don't want to recreate all the "accounts" and "home directories" in Linux which are already created in active directory. i am already familiar and using winbind

Re: Postfix with Active directory

2012-11-27 Thread Erwan David
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 09:03:56AM CET, Muhammad Yousuf Khan said: > Newbie Alert! :) > > i am using Postfix with maildir and i want my mailboxes to be > integrated with my active directly windows 2003 server. > i don't want to recreate all the "accounts" and "home directories" in > Linux which

Re: Postfix with Active directory

2012-11-27 Thread Muhammad Yousuf Khan
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Erwan David wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 09:03:56AM CET, Muhammad Yousuf Khan > said: >> Newbie Alert! :) >> >> i am using Postfix with maildir and i want my mailboxes to be >> integrated with my active directly windows 2003 server. >> i don't want to recreat

Re: Postfix with Active directory

2012-11-27 Thread Erwan David
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:22:48AM CET, Muhammad Yousuf Khan said: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Erwan David wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 09:03:56AM CET, Muhammad Yousuf Khan > > said: > >> Newbie Alert! :) > >> > >> i am using Postfix with maildir and i want my mailboxes to be > >>

destination rate_delay not working?

2012-11-27 Thread Len Conrad
freebsd 9.0 postfix 2.10 we have: master.cf orange unix - - n - 1 smtp and transport.map orange.fr orange: wanadoo.fr orange: main.cf postconf | egrep destination | egrep -iv '\$' default_destination_concurrency_failed_cohort_limit = 1 default_destination_concurrency_limit = 1 default_dest

Limit outgoing SMTP connections

2012-11-27 Thread and...@sh3.com.br
I have a Postfix Server configured by myself running on a 3rd part linux cloud server. This cloud server __has__ to be limited to up to 60 SMTP outgoing concurrent connections at the once. If it bypass this limit, it's blocked for 30 minutes and the postfix can't deliver any e-mail during thi

Re: Limit outgoing SMTP connections

2012-11-27 Thread Wietse Venema
and...@sh3.com.br: > I have a Postfix Server configured by myself running on a 3rd part linux > cloud server. > > This cloud server __has__ to be limited to up to 60 SMTP outgoing > concurrent connections at the once. If it bypass this limit, it's http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#default

Re: destination rate_delay not working?

2012-11-27 Thread Wietse Venema
Len Conrad: > > freebsd 9.0 > postfix 2.10 > > we have: > > master.cf > > orange unix - - n - 1 smtp > > and transport.map > > orange.fr orange: > wanadoo.fr orange: > > main.cf > > postconf | egrep destination | egrep -iv '\$' > > default_destination_concurrency_failed_cohort_limit = 1 >

Forwarding to internal servers

2012-11-27 Thread Jim Nalepa - US
Hello, I am looking for assistance with the following scenario. We have two mail locations that we would like to route mail based on an ldap attribute. The LDAP attribute that is being queried is the internal email address of the user: us...@server1.example.com us...@server2.example.com I

Re: Forwarding to internal servers

2012-11-27 Thread jeffrey j donovan
On Nov 27, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Jim Nalepa - US wrote: > Hello, > > I am looking for assistance with the following scenario. > > We have two mail locations that we would like to route mail based on an ldap > attribute. > > The LDAP attribute that is being queried is the internal email addr

RE: Forwarding to internal servers

2012-11-27 Thread Jim Nalepa - US
Jeffrey, Thanks for the prompt response. We are heavily invested in ldap (used centrally throughout network) and would hate to replicate, and maintain two instances of the db. Any other thoughts? Thanks, Jim From: jeffrey j donovan [mailto:dono...@beth.k12.pa.us] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 201

Re: Postfix with Active directory

2012-11-27 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 01:03:56PM +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: > I am using Postfix with maildir and I want my mailboxes to be > integrated with my active directly windows 2003 server. So you're not using Microsoft Exchange, with Postfix just a border gateway then? If so, your Active Dire

Re: Forwarding to internal servers

2012-11-27 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 03:49:42PM +, Jim Nalepa - US wrote: > Thanks for the prompt response. > We are heavily invested in ldap (used centrally throughout network) > and would hate to replicate, and maintain two instances of the db. > > Any other thoughts? The standard advice is: -

Handling cc and bcc receipients from incoming mail

2012-11-27 Thread Ed
When my.postfix.com receives an email from an outside source, my.postfix.com tries to relay the cc and bcc receipients through their host domain postfix/smtp to=, relay=mail.someonelesesserver.com[216.54.45.133]:25, delay=0.38, delays=0.01/0.05/0.14/0.18, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host mai

unable to lock for exclusive access: Resource temporarily unavailable

2012-11-27 Thread Frank Bonnet
Hello I'm facing a boring problem for few accounts ( less than 10 over 2000 ) on my freebsd 9.0 mailhub , see below the error message I get in maillog Nov 27 17:59:45 mail postfix/local[11988]: 3Y9n2B5TH9zYmgf: to=, orig_to=, relay=local, delay=10175, delays=10156/0.02/0/19, dsn=4.2.0, status

Re: unable to lock for exclusive access: Resource temporarily unavailable

2012-11-27 Thread Brian Evans - Postfix List
On 11/27/2012 12:40 PM, Frank Bonnet wrote: > Hello > > I'm facing a boring problem for few accounts ( less than 10 over 2000 ) > on my freebsd 9.0 mailhub , see below the error message I get in maillog > > > Nov 27 17:59:45 mail postfix/local[11988]: 3Y9n2B5TH9zYmgf: > to=, orig_to=, relay=local,

Re: Handling cc and bcc receipients from incoming mail

2012-11-27 Thread Wietse Venema
Ed: > When my.postfix.com receives an email from an outside source, > my.postfix.com tries to relay the cc and bcc receipients through their > host domain ... > Receiving a message: > > from z...@someoneelsesserver.com > to x...@mypostfix.com > cc y...@someonelesesserver.com > > The server will

Re: Handling cc and bcc receipients from incoming mail

2012-11-27 Thread Wietse Venema
Ed: >It looks like postfix on my server? is doing the routing and trying >to relay the CC and BCC back to their server. Are you using a content filter that uses the "sendmail" command? Wietse

Re: Handling cc and bcc receipients from incoming mail

2012-11-27 Thread Ed
Wietse: I am using amavisd which hooks into spamassison. Did not find any references to sendmail using fgrep for any of the directories In the main.cf the only references are the paths to sendmail. Ed > > From: Wietse Venema >To: Postfix users >Sent: Tue

Re: Initial 220 greeting timeout

2012-11-27 Thread Alex
Stan, >> Right, that makes sense. A spammer wouldn't have access to a >> consecutive block of dynamic IPs, like from a cable company or >> Verizon. It still could mean that it's listed in the PBL by now, >> though. > > Again, the IP in question will never be listed in the PBL. SBL maybe, > PBL no

Re: unable to lock for exclusive access: Resource temporarily unavailable

2012-11-27 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 11/27/2012 11:47 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: > On 11/27/2012 12:40 PM, Frank Bonnet wrote: >> Hello >> >> I'm facing a boring problem for few accounts ( less than 10 over 2000 ) >> on my freebsd 9.0 mailhub , see below the error message I get in maillog >> >> >> Nov 27 17:59:45 mail po

Re: Handling cc and bcc receipients from incoming mail

2012-11-27 Thread Wietse Venema
Ed: > Wietse: > >I am using amavisd which hooks into spamassison. > >Did not find any references to sendmail using fgrep for any of the >directories > >In the main.cf the only references are the paths to sendmail. In that case, have you considered the possibility that the client (Exchange, I belie

Re: Initial 220 greeting timeout

2012-11-27 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 11/27/2012 2:51 PM, Alex wrote: > Stan, > >>> Right, that makes sense. A spammer wouldn't have access to a >>> consecutive block of dynamic IPs, like from a cable company or >>> Verizon. It still could mean that it's listed in the PBL by now, >>> though. >> >> Again, the IP in question will nev