Hello all,
Managed to get my mail server running,
it serves 6 domains , mydomain.(.net, .com, and .co.za) and
lists.mydomain.(.net, .com, and .co.za)
These are setup as relay domains, so for instance, anything sent to
mydomain.net goes to another mail server via smtp, and anything sent to
l
Am 30.10.2012 07:12, schrieb Naval saini:
> can we add To address in outgoing mails body postfix mail server. If it's
> possible then please provide a proper reference.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Adding-TO-address-in-mail-body-tp51970.html
Hi,
How to configure Postfix to reject unencrypted connections?
Will the following do the job?
smtp_tls_security_level = encrypt
smtpd_tls_security_level = encrypt
smtp_tls_mandatory_protocols = TLSv1
Should I enable "smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes" and
"smtp_tls_policy_maps" along with the above co
Hi,
Do you see any problems with this [1] guide?
"Note: by changing the saslauthd path other applications that use
saslauthd may be affected." [1]
How to check that I won't break other apps?
Also, I have some problems with this command:
$ sudo dpkg-statoverride --force --update \
> --add root
On 10/30/2012 1:59 AM, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Managed to get my mail server running,
>
> it serves 6 domains , mydomain.(.net, .com, and .co.za) and
> lists.mydomain.(.net, .com, and .co.za)
>
> These are setup as relay domains, so for instance, anything sent to
> mydomain.net
* thorso...@lavabit.com :
> Hi,
>
> Do you see any problems with this [1] guide?
>
> "Note: by changing the saslauthd path other applications that use
> saslauthd may be affected." [1]
>
> How to check that I won't break other apps?
They fail? If you tell saslauthd to establish the authenticatio
On 10/30/2012 2:52 AM, thorso...@lavabit.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How to configure Postfix to reject unencrypted connections?
>
> Will the following do the job?
>
> smtp_tls_security_level = encrypt
> smtpd_tls_security_level = encrypt
The above two settings are sufficient to require encryption on
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 08:59:09AM +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
> Managed to get my mail server running,
>
> it serves 6 domains , mydomain.(.net, .com, and .co.za) and
> lists.mydomain.(.net, .com, and .co.za)
>
> These are setup as relay domains, so for instance, anything sent
> to mydomain.
Christoph Anton Mitterer:
> On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 02:06 +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > (I am aware of Wietse's reply to the message I am quoting.)
> Yeah... so ongoing discussion on the issue itself is rather pointless,
> nevertheless...
I repeat my constructive solution: contribute code and do
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> Currently we set:
>
> [zimbra ~]$ postconf smtpd_recipient_restrictions
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
> permit_sasl_authenticated, permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination,
> reject_unlisted_recipient, reject_non_fqdn_sender, permit
>
> I
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 03:57:33AM -0400, thorso...@lavabit.com
wrote:
> Do you see any problems with this [1] guide?
>
> "Note: by changing the saslauthd path other applications that use
> saslauthd may be affected." [1]
Sure. Why did you (why did the author of the guide) choose Cyrus
SASL?
--On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 9:34 AM -0400 Wietse Venema
wrote:
However the idea is to separate the relay authorization features
from the anti-spam features. For example:
# Relay authorization.
smtpd_relay_restrictions =
permit_sasl_authenticated, permit_mynetworks,
reject_unauth_destin
I have a question regarding the "smtpd_relay_restrictions" setting in
Postfix 2.10. I have installed Postfix via the FreeBSD ports system.
Postfix identifies itself as "Postfix (2.10-20120801)"; however, if I
try: "postconf -d "smtpd_relay_restrictions", I receive the following
error message
postc
--On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 2:06 PM -0400 Jerry
wrote:
I have a question regarding the "smtpd_relay_restrictions" setting in
Postfix 2.10. I have installed Postfix via the FreeBSD ports system.
Postfix identifies itself as "Postfix (2.10-20120801)"; however, if I
try: "postconf -d "smtpd_re
On 10/30/2012 1:06 PM, Jerry wrote:
> I have a question regarding the "smtpd_relay_restrictions" setting in
> Postfix 2.10. I have installed Postfix via the FreeBSD ports system.
> Postfix identifies itself as "Postfix (2.10-20120801)"; however, if I
> try: "postconf -d "smtpd_relay_restrictions",
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 09:24 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> I repeat my constructive solution: contribute code and documentation
> that makes the mailbox format configurable.
I had noted below in the email before, that I'll need to take a loot at
the code first, before I can decide whether I can make
My topology is as follows..
1. Postfix mail gateway which ultimately invokes dspam content filter
which relays the email to backend mailbox server.
2. The backend mailbox server runs both postfix and dovecot.
It appears it tried to send email to itself. As per configuration
below, a dovecot de
I found the problem. I was missing virtual_mailbox_domains.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> My topology is as follows..
>
> 1. Postfix mail gateway which ultimately invokes dspam content filter
> which relays the email to backend mailbox server.
> 2. The backend mailbo
In Postfix 2.10 Snapshot 20121022, conf/post-install tests whether
smtpd_relay_restrictions is already set with:
test -n "`$POSTCONF -c $config_directory -nh smtpd_relay_restrictions`"
This evaluates to false when smtpd_relay_restrictions is explicitly set
to the empty value in main.cf, resulti
19 matches
Mail list logo
