Hello all
I'm thinking to move all users's inboxes from local mailhub filesystem (
FreeBSD 9.0 )
to a NFS mounted directory to a NetAPP filer to take advantage of the
netapp facilities.
I use traditional MBOX format and real UNIX users through LDAP (
pam_ldap + nss_ldap )
Actually all user
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 03:07:47 +0200
Benny Pedersen articulated:
> Den 2012-08-20 22:49, Reindl Harald skrev:
>
> > this is a absolutely common way to specify host:port for all sort
> > of service-types and clients
>
> microsoft try to sell better manuels as a thing that cost more :=)
Frank Bonnet:
> What would happen with postfix if it cannot access to users's mailboxes ?
> ( Eg : LAN down or filer stopped )
If the mailbox file system is hard mounted then the Postfix mail
delivery agent will hang until the LAN comes back or the filer is
rebooted. When a Postfix process hangs l
Den 2012-08-21 11:57, Jerry skrev:
but i dont need this to setup smtp auth in nokia, only windows needs
it, i keep my symbian os
Den 2012-08-21 10:02, Frank Bonnet skrev:
What would happen with postfix if it cannot access to users's
mailboxes ?
( Eg : LAN down or filer stopped )
then it stays in queue until dovecot is ready to deliver
to see it, stop dovecot, then see what postfix do
On 08/21/2012 01:32 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Den 2012-08-21 10:02, Frank Bonnet skrev:
What would happen with postfix if it cannot access to users's
mailboxes ?
( Eg : LAN down or filer stopped )
then it stays in queue until dovecot is ready to deliver
to see it, stop dovecot, then see wha
On 21.08.2012 10:02, Frank Bonnet wrote:
What would happen with postfix if it cannot access to users's mailboxes ?
( Eg : LAN down or filer stopped )
Hi,
how are you supposed to get external Mail when your LAN is down? If
Dovecot isn't running the Mail will stay in the Postfix-Queue for some
On 08/21/2012 12:56 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Frank Bonnet:
What would happen with postfix if it cannot access to users's mailboxes ?
( Eg : LAN down or filer stopped )
If the mailbox file system is hard mounted then the Postfix mail
delivery agent will hang until the LAN comes back or the filer
Dear List,
Existing setup:
main.cf has mail_size_limit of 30 MB.
we are using smtpd_policy feature and controlling the allowed mail
size for mails. That is, if somebody requests to send higher size
mail, say about 10 MB, we write his email id and allowed size in a
file, and based on this
an...@isac.gov.in:
> Now, we want to automate it, using some kind of work flow. If somebody
> sends a mail, higher than 2 Mb, postfix can detect it. Can it
> redirect to some administrator for approval? If say, approved, by
> mail itself, then it can proceed with delivery to recipient?
Thi
[root@mtayd CA]# yum install openssl-perl
..
[root@mtayd CA]# yum install pki-ca
..
[root@mtayd CA]# pwd
/etc/pki/CA
After yum install, I reboot the system.
[root@mtayd CA]# openssl ca -out postfix_cert.pem -infiles
postfix_public.pem
Using configuration from /etc/pki/tls/openssl.cnf
Ente
Hi everyone.
I've postfix working great but I cant make the rbl works, I have the
configuration but when I test the configuration it seems not to be working.
I'm testing with http://www.crynwr.com/spam/ Spamhaus has that ip
address listed but I'm still getting those emails.
Here's the postc
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:30:47PM +0800, Feel Zhou wrote:
> [root@mtayd CA]# yum install openssl-perl
> ..
> [root@mtayd CA]# yum install pki-ca
> ..
> [root@mtayd CA]# pwd
> /etc/pki/CA
>
> After yum install, I reboot the system.
No way! Really? All you did there was install a few scrip
* Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez :
> Hi everyone.
>
> I've postfix working great but I cant make the rbl works, I have the
> configuration but when I test the configuration it seems not to be
> working.
Logs?
> I'm testing with http://www.crynwr.com/spam/ Spamhaus has that ip
> address listed
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:03:47AM -0500,
Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote:
> I've postfix working great but I cant make the rbl works, I have
> the configuration but when I test the configuration it seems not
> to be working.
>
> I'm testing with http://www.crynwr.com/spam/ Spamhaus has
On 8/21/2012 10:03 AM, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I've postfix working great but I cant make the rbl works, I have the
> configuration but when I test the configuration it seems not to be
> working.
>
> I'm testing with http://www.crynwr.com/spam/ Spamhaus has that ip
Feel Zhou:
> [root@mtayd CA]# openssl ca -out postfix_cert.pem -infiles
If you want help, show that you follow the TLS_README
instructions exactly.
$ script output-file-name
$ /some/where/CA.pl -newca
...
$ exit
Then send the contents of output-file-name.
Wietse
On 8/21/12 9:20 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez:
Hi everyone.
I've postfix working great but I cant make the rbl works, I have the
configuration but when I test the configuration it seems not to be
working.
Logs?
I'm testing with http://www.crynwr.com/spam/ Spam
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:03:47AM -0500, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes
Jiménez wrote:
I've postfix working great but I cant make the rbl works, I have
the configuration but when I test the configuration it seems not
to be working.
I'm testing with http://www.crynwr.com/spam/ Spamhaus has that ip
addr
* Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez :
> The IP that's testing my mail server is 192.203.178.107, I used the
> spamhaus lookup tool to confirm that the IP was listed.
192.203.178.107 is indeed listed.
$ host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org
107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.2
t
On 8/21/12 9:25 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 8/21/2012 10:03 AM, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote:
Hi everyone.
I've postfix working great but I cant make the rbl works, I have the
configuration but when I test the configuration it seems not to be
working.
I'm testing with htt
On 8/21/12 9:46 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez:
The IP that's testing my mail server is 192.203.178.107, I used the
spamhaus lookup tool to confirm that the IP was listed.
192.203.178.107 is indeed listed.
$ host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org
107.178.203.192
* Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez :
> Thanks it seems to be an issue with spamhaus, here's the result:
>
> [root@mail ~]# host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org
> Host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
> [root@mail ~]#
Use a proper DNS server (like somebody on this thread al
On 8/21/12 9:57 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez:
Thanks it seems to be an issue with spamhaus, here's the result:
[root@mail ~]# host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org
Host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
[root@mail ~]#
Use a proper DNS se
* Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez :
> Thanks as I was telling I have one, but I think the issue is with the
> forwarding
Yes. Why are you forwarding at all? Simply let you DNS recurse & cache.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
On 8/21/2012 11:02 AM, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote:
>
> On 8/21/12 9:57 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> * Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez:
>>
>>> Thanks it seems to be an issue with spamhaus, here's the result:
>>>
>>> [root@mail ~]# host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org
>>> Host 107.178.2
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:45:50AM -0500,
Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote:
> Thanks for the tip but I have bind running and it seems not to be
> allowed to make queries to spamhaus:
>
> [root@mail ~]# dig 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org any
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.10.rc1.el6_3.
Zitat von Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez :
On 8/21/12 9:57 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez:
Thanks it seems to be an issue with spamhaus, here's the result:
[root@mail ~]# host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org
Host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org not found: 3
On 8/21/12 10:06 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:45:50AM -0500,
Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez wrote:
Thanks for the tip but I have bind running and it seems not to be
allowed to make queries to spamhaus:
[root@mail ~]# dig 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org any
;<<>> DiG 9.8.2rc
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:06:34AM -0500, I wrote:
> That was my guess. Now it seems to be confirmed. Remove the
> forwarders from named.conf(5), ensure that recursion is allowed at
> least for "localhost"[1], "rndc reload", test again. If the test
> fails again, you might have to flush the cach
Hello list,
We use the address verification features to relay to and from backend
servers. This works great, but I seem to be missing or misunderstanding
some part of how the maintenance of the verification cache works with
regard to positive results.
For example, when an existing account is d
Thanks for rob0's proposal
I need to read avary word of tow document
http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html
http://www.postfix.org/TLS_LEGACY_README.html
sorry ,in my system, I can't find the CA.pl
I have no idea how to find it,
[root@mtayd local]# pwd
/usr/local
[root@mtayd local]# ls
bin etc
Den 2012-08-21 16:53, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez skrev:
[root@mail ~]# host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org
Host 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
[root@mail ~]#
dig +trace 107.178.203.192.zen.spamhaus.org
where does it fail ?
then contact the nameservers that rej
Den 2012-08-21 17:02, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez skrev:
Thanks as I was telling I have one, but I think the issue is with the
forwarding it's been made to a public dns server. Should I change it
to a particular one? (ex spamhaus)
no just remove ALL forwarding !
On 8/21/12 11:23 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Den 2012-08-21 17:02, Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jiménez skrev:
Thanks as I was telling I have one, but I think the issue is with the
forwarding it's been made to a public dns server. Should I change it
to a particular one? (ex spamhaus)
no just remove
Feel Zhou:
> sorry ,in my system, I can't find the CA.pl
> I have no idea how to find it,
If you don't have CA.pl (installed with "yum install openssl-perl"
or otherwise), then there is no reason to continue this discussion.
Wietse
2012/8/15 Peter N. M. Hansteen
>
> I beg to differ. spamd(8) in any configuration is a lot more lightweight
> than
> content filtering. You most likely will need content filtering in addition
> to greylisting+greytrapping, but stopping them earlier is a real plus.
> See eg http://undeadly.org/cgi
I use postfix with postscreen, spamhaus and other RBLs, nolist greylisting,
sqlgrey greylisting, amavisd-new (which calls in spamassassin), and clamav.
Freshclam and sa-update are run daily by cron.
Here are my stats today on the primary MX (actually secondary due to nolist)
Aug 21
Connect: 1384
Thanks for the reply Francis!
Here on OpenBSD, spamd takes care of the greylisting so I'm all set there.
After much going back and forth regarding amavisd-new+spamassassin, I came
to the conclusion that it was an overly complex solution, written in a
dying language, that during the course of time
[ Mikkel Bang wrote on Tue 21.Aug'12 at 21:06:20 +0200 ]
> Thanks for the reply Francis!
>
> Here on OpenBSD, spamd takes care of the greylisting so I'm all set there.
>
> After much going back and forth regarding amavisd-new+spamassassin, I came
> to the conclusion that it was an overly complex
On 21/08/2012 19:34, Mikkel Bang wrote:
> Thanks a lot everyone! After thinking long and hard about all your
> advice I finally ended up with:
>
> OpenBSD + postfix-anti-UCE.txt + undeadly's spamd setup (which
> includes greylisting+greytrapping) + dspam: https://gist.github.com/3417519
>
> Feedb
[ Daniele Nicolodi wrote on Tue 21.Aug'12 at 23:22:20 +0200 ]
> On 21/08/2012 19:34, Mikkel Bang wrote:
> > Thanks a lot everyone! After thinking long and hard about all your
> > advice I finally ended up with:
> >
> > OpenBSD + postfix-anti-UCE.txt + undeadly's spamd setup (which
> > includes gr
42 matches
Mail list logo
