Good morning, I noticed that postmaster connects IMAP4 whit webmail
and I generated spam.
I can reset the password for postmaster?
give me the info?
thanks
Content-Tr48:09 nameserver imapd[16380]: imap service init from 127.0.0.1
Jun 14 07:48:09 nameserver imapd[16380]: Login user=postmaster
host
Am 14.06.2012 11:34, schrieb Giuseppe Perna:
> Good morning, I noticed that postmaster connects IMAP4 whit webmail
> and I generated spam.
> I can reset the password for postmaster?
> give me the info?
IMAP has nothing to do with Postfix
Additionally no one knows your configuration
we do not kn
hello, thanks for the answer.
What divrei check? it slackware linux operating system.
these doors open.
22/tcp open ssh
25/tcp open smtp
37/tcp open time
80/tcp open http
110/tcp open pop3
113/tcp open auth
125/tcp open locus-map
143/tcp open imap
443/tcp open https
IMAP4 and POP4 ar
sadly to say but this all sounds that you have no plan
what are you doing at all - please consult the admin
for the mailsystem (hopefully one exists)
Am 14.06.2012 12:05, schrieb Giuseppe Perna:
> hello, thanks for the answer.
> What divrei check? it slackware linux operating system.
> these doors
Hello
I'm currently using Postscreen to reduce the number of botspams handled
by our email server, and it's working good.
Is there any way to reduce the postscreen logging level though?
I feel that the information it logs is great while debugging, but once
the server is in prodution it make th
Daniel L. Miller:
> Can a SQL database be used for the recipient verification storage?
The following link has a patch which enables Postfix to write to a MySQL
Database. With that you can keep your verify db in a MySQL database.
Use at your own risk.
https://api.opensuse.org/public/source/home:r
Elaconta.com Webmaster:
> Hello
>
> I'm currently using Postscreen to reduce the number of botspams handled
> by our email server, and it's working good.
> Is there any way to reduce the postscreen logging level though?
No, When someone reports a problem, the logging is needed to find
out what p
Wietse Venema wrote:
Elaconta.com Webmaster:
Hello
I'm currently using Postscreen to reduce the number of botspams handled
by our email server, and it's working good.
Is there any way to reduce the postscreen logging level though?
No, When someone reports a problem, the logging is n
Hello
I would like to reroute all yahoo domains to another SMTP
server of mine but the pcre wildcard in TLD filed I tried to
use does not work ... any pointer to PCRE examples welcome !
the rule in the transport map is the following
This does not work --> /\@yahoo\.*$/smtp:[another.smtp.se
On Jun 13, 2012, at 9:56 PM, jeffrey j donovan wrote:
>
> On Jun 13, 2012, at 9:39 PM, jeffrey j donovan wrote:
>
>> Greetings
>> it has been a long time since I've done this, and could use some guidance.
>>
>> I have one domain ( example.com ) and 7 systems.
>>
>> mx1.example.com
>> Av1.exam
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 04:06:28PM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> This does not work --> /\@yahoo\.*$/smtp:[another.smtp.server]
It works, but it is not what you want. :-)
$ echo lu...@yahoo.com | pcregrep -q '@yahoo\.*$' && echo yes || echo "no"
no
On the other hand:
$ echo lu...@yah
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 04:06:28PM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
>
>> This does not work --> /\@yahoo\.*$/smtp:[another.smtp.server]
>
Try /\@yahoo\..*$/
You are escaping the '.' and then matching zero or more periods.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byr
- Mensaje original -
> De: "Noel Jones"
> Para: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Enviados: Miércoles, 13 de Junio 2012 20:42:48
> Asunto: Re: How to handle local mail when throttling?
> On 6/13/2012 4:34 AM, Adrian Gibanel wrote:
> > I have setup a throttling postfix based on
> > http://flur
On 06/14/2012 04:42 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 04:06:28PM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
This does not work --> /\@yahoo\.*$/smtp:[another.smtp.server]
It works, but it is not what you want. :-)
$ echo lu...@yahoo.com | pcregrep -q '@yahoo\.*$'&& echo yes || echo
On Thu, June 14, 2012 05:34, Giuseppe Perna wrote:
> Good morning, I noticed that postmaster connects IMAP4 whit webmail
> and I generated spam.
> I can reset the password for postmaster?
> give me the info?
> thanks
>
> Content-Tr48:09 nameserver imapd[16380]: imap service init from
> 127.0.0.1
On 6/14/2012 9:42 AM, jeffrey j donovan wrote:
>
> On Jun 13, 2012, at 9:56 PM, jeffrey j donovan wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 13, 2012, at 9:39 PM, jeffrey j donovan wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings
>>> it has been a long time since I've done this, and could use some guidance.
>>>
>>> I have one domain ( exampl
On Jun 14, 2012, at 11:34 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> The proper solution is to use a global virtual_alias_maps to map
> users to the correct server. Use rsync or similar to synchronize
> the virtual_alias file among the servers.
>
> # main.cf
> virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
>
On 6/14/2012 10:12 AM, Adrian Gibanel wrote:
>
> Thank you Noel but there's a little problem on your solution I think. I mean.
> What I want is:
>
> Throttle emails:
> * Sending to any domain: Wait 15 seconds between sending an email and
> another email
Why in the world would you do that
On 6/14/2012 10:50 AM, jeffrey j donovan wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2012, at 11:34 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
>
>>
>> The proper solution is to use a global virtual_alias_maps to map
>> users to the correct server. Use rsync or similar to synchronize
>> the virtual_alias file among the servers.
>>
>> # ma
- Mensaje original -
> De: "Noel Jones"
> Para: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Enviados: Jueves, 14 de Junio 2012 17:52:14
> Asunto: Re: How to handle local mail when throttling?
> On 6/14/2012 10:12 AM, Adrian Gibanel wrote:
> >
> > Thank you Noel but there's a little problem on your sol
I have a Postfix server which receives mail messages and if they are
not local forwards them to another host... using the relayhost =
[x.x.x.x] directive in main.cf
After configuring the relayhost, some domains are marking as spam the
messages by the remote servers, i think is for the hop between
On 6/14/2012 11:26 AM, Adrian Gibanel wrote:
>> If you insist on a default delay, you can create a "zerodelay"
>> transport for your local domain that resets the delay to zero.
>
> Does it mean editing:
>
> /etc/postfix/transport file to add:
>
> my.domain.comrelayratelimit:
>
> line
>
On 6/14/2012 11:30 AM, jferi...@gmail.com wrote:
> I have a Postfix server which receives mail messages and if they are
> not local forwards them to another host... using the relayhost =
> [x.x.x.x] directive in main.cf
>
> After configuring the relayhost, some domains are marking as spam the
> me
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:30:59AM -0700, jferi...@gmail.com wrote:
> I have a Postfix server which receives mail messages and if they
> are not local forwards them to another host... using the relayhost
> = [x.x.x.x] directive in main.cf
>
> After configuring the relayhost, some domains are mar
Thanks James, Thanks James, you're a true friend.
I allow relaying only to the hosts declared in main.cf file and users
are in the file / etc / passwd. postmaster is the user in this file. I
can confidently change the password or disable the user postmaster?
I'm not going to cause damage to the Po
On Jun 14, 2012, at 12:09 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> There's no need to duplicate the users in transport; all the
> mappings should be in virtual_alias_maps.
okay,..
all my users are already in transport, but having issue with global alias
I would need to convert my rsync/scp scripts, and setup my n
Hummm. In main.cf I have:
relayhost =
and I also have:
virtual_mailbox_domains = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_domains.cf
which I have never noticed before... but yes, it was there all the time.
So /etc/postfix/mysql_domains.cf contents are:
user=mail
password=mysecret
dbname=maildb
table=do
On 6/14/2012 12:06 PM, jeffrey j donovan wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2012, at 12:09 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>
>> There's no need to duplicate the users in transport; all the
>> mappings should be in virtual_alias_maps.
> okay,..
> all my users are already in transport, but having issue with global alias
On 6/14/2012 12:40 PM, Adrian Gibanel wrote:
> Hummm. In main.cf I have:
>
> relayhost =
As I said earlier, I'm more interested in the setting of relay_domains.
> and I also have:
> virtual_mailbox_domains = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_domains.cf
> which I have never noticed before... but yes,
Le mardi 12 juin 2012 à 19:28 +0200, ml a écrit :
> hello masters of postfix masters of c honorable and doctors
> and especially to master Wietse
>
> I am looking for a mini smtp server that takes a few lines or file.
> as it is possible to write an smtp client in c in a few hundred lines
> http
Harald
On 2012-06-14 Reindl Harald wrote:
> sadly to say but this all sounds that you have no plan what are you
> doing at all - please consult the admin for the mailsystem (hopefully
> one exists)
If you don't want to provide help, it'd be better to not respond at all.
Snide remarks will not hel
Am 14.06.2012 21:34, schrieb Ansgar Wiechers:
> Harald
>
> On 2012-06-14 Reindl Harald wrote:
>> sadly to say but this all sounds that you have no plan what are you
>> doing at all - please consult the admin for the mailsystem (hopefully
>> one exists)
>
> If you don't want to provide help, it'
* Reindl Harald :
>
>
> Am 14.06.2012 21:34, schrieb Ansgar Wiechers:
> > Harald
> >
> > On 2012-06-14 Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> sadly to say but this all sounds that you have no plan what are you
> >> doing at all - please consult the admin for the mailsystem (hopefully
> >> one exists)
> >
>
On 2012-06-14 Giuseppe Perna wrote:
> I allow relaying only to the hosts declared in main.cf file and users
> are in the file / etc / passwd. postmaster is the user in this file. I
> can confidently change the password or disable the user postmaster?
> I'm not going to cause damage to the Postfix
On Thu, June 14, 2012 13:03, Giuseppe Perna wrote:
> I allow relaying only to the hosts declared in main.cf file and users
> are in the file / etc / passwd. postmaster is the user in this file. I
> can confidently change the password or disable the user postmaster?
> I'm not going to cause damag
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:34:17AM +0200, Giuseppe Perna wrote:
> Good morning, I noticed that postmaster connects IMAP4 whit webmail
> and I generated spam.
This does not make sense. Try to work on a better problem
description. Why did you "generate spam"? How did you find out about
it?
> I ca
One more thing occurs to me. Your webmail site does require https
right? You do not accept plain text credentials over the Internet,
correct?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited htt
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 05:42:37PM +0200, Dennis Guhl wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 09:15:55AM -0600, David Boreham wrote:
>
> [How to apply a restriction at some connections only?]
>
> > What's the best way to implement this ? I think restriction
> > classes are the way to go , but I'm not 1
This is very similar to a thread I posted on Ubuntu Forums a week ago that
hasn't been resolved:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2001283
This is my configuration as of today, but this particular e-mail system is
not enabled by my router yet; no port traffic is directed to this machine
so
I have a situation where email delivered to a single namespace needs to be
delivered to a user who could be in one of a number of downstream system
(but we don't know which one). I was wondering if I could use "Callback
Verification" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Callback_verification to achieve
thi
Noel & Rob0:
Thanks for your help...
On 6/14/2012 8:38 PM, Adam Bradley wrote:
> I have a situation where email delivered to a single namespace needs
> to be delivered to a user who could be in one of a number of
> downstream system (but we don't know which one
that sounds... broken.
> I was wondering if
> I could use "Callback Veri
Noel,
Inline.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 6/14/2012 8:38 PM, Adam Bradley wrote:
> > I have a situation where email delivered to a single namespace needs
> > to be delivered to a user who could be in one of a number of
> > downstream system (but we don't know which o
43 matches
Mail list logo
