On 07/05/12 18:46, Fiona Hines wrote:
> That won't work for me. SNI support is the only solution for my
> scenario sinceI can't use just one SSL certificate. I haven't used
> Google Apps to know what you are talking about.
I used google apps as an example of a provider that services what
probabl
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 11:46:45PM -0700, Fiona Hines wrote:
> That won't work for me.? SNI support is the only solution for my
> scenario since I can't use just one SSL certificate. I haven't used
> Google Apps to know what you are talking about.
Postfix has no SNI support. Effort >> benefit.
W
Fiona Hines:
> How do I get TLS SNI support in Postfix?? I can't find any
> documentation on the subject except a few discussions that are
> several years old.? I've got TLS working with one domain but I
> want to expand it to an unknown number of domains and I don't care
> if the mail client lacks
"Postfix has no SNI support. Effort >> benefit."
Dovecot implemented SNI support. Dovecot implements a different set of
protocols, but they implemented SNI for 50% of e-mail (the receiving end). If
the receiving end of e-mail has SNI, the sending end should probably implement
it too if, for n
I understand now what you are referring to but you were assuming that I was
using STARTTLS, which was my mistake for not mentioning it. I'm not using
STARTTLS. The connection is encrypted from the beginning of the transaction.
STARTTLS was created as part of the standards for e-mail because S
Hi all,
I made a patch for mailgraph to visualize postscreen rejects on the
graphs separately, not cumulated with rejects or spam.
Based on http://www.networkmonkey.de/mailgraph-und-postscreen/
Maybe someone find it useful ...
Example: http://store.birkosan.com/img/img_2012_05_07.png
http://
Fiona Hines:
> I understand now what you are referring to but you were assuming
> that I was using STARTTLS, which was my mistake for not mentioning
> it.? I'm not using STARTTLS.? The connection is encrypted from the
> beginning of the transaction.?
Let's do one step back.
Web clients/servers i
On May 7, 2012, at 15:52, Fiona Hines wrote:
> I understand now what you are referring to but you were assuming that I was
> using STARTTLS, which was my mistake for not mentioning it. I'm not using
> STARTTLS. The connection is encrypted from the beginning of the transaction.
> STARTTLS was
Am 07.05.2012 12:52, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Fiona Hines:
>> How do I get TLS SNI support in Postfix?? I can't find any
>> documentation on the subject except a few discussions that are
>> several years old.? I've got TLS working with one domain but I
>> want to expand it to an unknown number of d
Hi List,
I'd like to configure my hub mail server to listen for connections on
port 465 SMTPs SSL - wrapper mode while still accepting standard
unencrypted SMTP coming from the scripts running on the machine.
Intuitively, I configure my master.cf like this :
smtp inet n - n
Jean-Fran?ois Stenuit:
> Hi List,
>
> I'd like to configure my hub mail server to listen for connections on
> port 465 SMTPs SSL - wrapper mode while still accepting standard
> unencrypted SMTP coming from the scripts running on the machine.
>
> Intuitively, I configure my master.cf like this :
>
Am 07.05.2012 16:17, schrieb Bernhard Schmidt:
> It is in use, but not very broadly. I don't have that many users on this
> postfix instance, maybe someone with some more traffic can run a statistic.
Oops, I have to exclude our monitoring connection, then almost all MUAs
send SNI. The only remain
On 7 May 2012, at 15:46, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jean-Fran?ois Stenuit:
>> Hi List,
>>
>> I'd like to configure my hub mail server to listen for connections on
>> port 465 SMTPs SSL - wrapper mode while still accepting standard
>> unencrypted SMTP coming from the scripts running on the machine.
>
Hello list -
We have some fairly involved routing requirements, and have been using a
script that creates a transport table from a number of source files.
It's been working well for some years, but now we have a need for
sender-dependent transport rules. We periodically creates the
sender_dep
On 5/7/2012 8:58 PM, Joe wrote:
> Hello list -
>
> We have some fairly involved routing requirements, and have been
> using a script that creates a transport table from a number of
> source files. It's been working well for some years, but now we have
> a need for sender-dependent transport rules.
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 06:52:44AM -0700, Fiona Hines wrote:
> I understand now what you are referring to but you were assuming
> that I was using STARTTLS, which was my mistake for not mentioning
> it.? I'm not using STARTTLS.? The connection is encrypted from the
> beginning of the transaction.?
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:04:21PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> > We have some fairly involved routing requirements, and have been
> > using a script that creates a transport table from a number of
> > source files. It's been working well for some years, but now we have
> > a need for sender-depende
Hi
I have heard of the vulnerability that exists in SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.0 that
could allow information disclosure if an attacker intercepts encrypted
traffic served from an affected system. TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2, and all cipher
suites that do not use CBC mode are not affected.
How do i use specific
18 matches
Mail list logo
