Re: A major fuckup on part of spamhaus:

On May 4, 2012, at 13:12, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL138067 > > The evidence section lists "inetnum: 95.218.0.0 - 95.219.255.255", yet > spamhaus listed 93.218.0.0/15 (93 instead of 95)! > > 93.218.0.0/15 includes large parts of german Deutsche Telekom dialups

Re: Postscreen DNSBL weights

Hello, this is my configuration: postscreen_dnsbl_sites = list.dnswl.org=127.0.[0..255].[2..3]*-2, iadb.isipp.com=127.[0;3].[1;100].[255;10;100]*-2, wl.mailspike.net=127.0.0.[18..20]*-2, dnsbl.ahbl.org, combined.njabl.org=127.0.0.[2;4;9]*2, dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.[2;3;7;10], zen.spamhaus.org=127

Re: header_checks rule that doesn't work

Le 05/05/2012 05:47, /dev/rob0 a écrit : > On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 10:03:35PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: >> Vincent Lefevre: >>> I've received a mail having: >>> >>> From: >>> =?GB2312?B?tfXBoyy2/rrP0ru19cGjLMj9us/Su7X1waMsy8S6z9K7tfXBoyy3/srOtfXB?= >>> >>> I wanted to reject such mail with >>> >

Re: A major f*up on part of spamhaus:

On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 09:38:47AM +0200, DTNX Postmaster wrote: > On May 4, 2012, at 13:12, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > > > http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL138067 > > > > The evidence section lists "inetnum: 95.218.0.0 - > > 95.219.255.255", yet spamhaus listed 93.218.0.0/15 > > (93 instead o

Re: header_checks rule that doesn't work

On 2012-05-04 22:47:15 -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote: > The OP showed that on two lines, but if it is, there would be leading > whitespace. You want to match a whole logical header, not only a > continued line. Ah, OK, thanks, I hadn't seen this part of the doc. I think I was confused by http://www.pos

Re: header_checks rule that doesn't work

On 2012-05-05 12:41:35 +0200, mouss wrote: > with pcre, you can use \s+ > > /Received:\s*from\s+\S+\s+\(\S+\s+\[\S+\]\)\s+by\+\S+/ ^^ \s+ > > that looks a bit cryptic, doesn't it? :) I wish pcre had a flag so that a space means \s+. That would pa

Re: Multiple IP

Thank you for advice. But the more I read the docs, the more I do not understand this feature. Sorry. In my case, postfix-in and postfix-out is one instance. I already have 2 postfix with identical configuration on separate servers. I need to create +5 or more postfix servers with same identical

Re: Multiple IP

Kirill Bychkov: > Thank you for advice. > > But the more I read the docs, the more I do not understand this feature. > Sorry. > > In my case, postfix-in and postfix-out is one instance. > I already have 2 postfix with identical configuration on separate servers. > I need to create +5 or more post

450 instead of 550 even though DNSBL rank exceeds postscreen_dnsbl_threshold?

For context: % postconf mail_version postscreen_dnsbl_threshold postscreen_dnsbl_action mail_version = 2.9.1 postscreen_dnsbl_threshold = 3 postscreen_dnsbl_action = enforce I have likely missed something simple, so feel free to bludgeon me with your cluebats. Earlier today, I received some U

Re: 450 instead of 550 even though DNSBL rank exceeds postscreen_dnsbl_threshold?

Sahil Tandon: > May 5 15:24:07 mx1 postfix/postscreen[38500]: CONNECT from > [88.23.204.109]:40294 to [69.147.83.52]:25 > May 5 15:24:07 mx1 postfix/dnsblog[45237]: addr 88.23.204.109 listed by > domain bl.spameatingmonkey.net as 127.0.0.3 > May 5 15:24:07 mx1 postfix/dnsblog[45234]: addr 8

..::mailbox listing issue::..

Hi everyone. I'm trying yo set up postfix with dovecot imap, everything works fine. We are using mailboxes without home directory (useradd -G username) and all the mailboxes go to /var/spool/mail/. We have all the users mailbox on that folder. If you add you account all the users mailbox are li

Re: 450 instead of 550 even though DNSBL rank exceeds postscreen_dnsbl_threshold?

On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 19:49:18 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Sahil Tandon: > > May 5 15:24:07 mx1 postfix/postscreen[38500]: CONNECT from > > [88.23.204.109]:40294 to [69.147.83.52]:25 > > May 5 15:24:07 mx1 postfix/dnsblog[45237]: addr 88.23.204.109 listed by > > domain bl.spameatingmonkey.