On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 09:38:47AM +0200, DTNX Postmaster wrote: > On May 4, 2012, at 13:12, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > > > http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL138067 > > > > The evidence section lists "inetnum: 95.218.0.0 - > > 95.219.255.255", yet spamhaus listed 93.218.0.0/15 > > (93 instead of 95)! > > > > 93.218.0.0/15 includes large parts of german Deutsche > > Telekom dialups :| > > http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/query/PBL681428 > > Wouldn't you reject them anyway because they are on the PBL, > or bypass the RBL check for authenticated clients that relay > through your server?
That was my first thought as well. Listings on SBL are supposed to work in deep header parsing. So listing PBL space in SBL could be disastrous. Thanks, Ralf, for reporting this. Thanks, Spamhaus, for fixing it. -- http://rob0.nodns4.us/ -- system administration and consulting Offlist GMX mail is seen only if "/dev/rob0" is in the Subject:
