Re: Premature "No Space left on device" on XFS

Stan Hoeppner: > nicely. On the other hand, you won't see an EXTx filesystem capable of > anywhere close to 10GB/s or greater file IO. Here XFS doesn't break a > sweat. I recall that XFS was optimized for fast read/write with large files, while email files are small, and have a comparatively hig

Re: Premature "No Space left on device" on XFS

On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 06:17:19AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Stan Hoeppner: > > nicely. On the other hand, you won't see an EXTx filesystem capable of > > anywhere close to 10GB/s or greater file IO. Here XFS doesn't break a > > sweat. > > I recall that XFS was optimized for fast read/write

Re: Premature "No Space left on device" on XFS

On 10/8/2011 5:17 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Stan Hoeppner: >> nicely. On the other hand, you won't see an EXTx filesystem capable of >> anywhere close to 10GB/s or greater file IO. Here XFS doesn't break a >> sweat. > > I recall that XFS was optimized for fast read/write with large > files, whi

Re: Premature "No Space left on device" on XFS

Stan Hoeppner: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > On 10/8/2011 5:17 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Stan Hoeppner: > >> nicely. On the other hand, you won't see an EXTx filesystem capable of > >> anywhere close to 10GB/s or greater file IO. Here XFS doesn't break a > >> sweat. > >

Re: : mails are not allowed to send with "from address" space

On 2011-10-07 02:43, yasith tharindu wrote: How should i change the policy? as a example (Do Not Reply)> is not allowed but (Do_Not_Reply)> is allowed to send. Allowed by whom ? A

Re: Premature "No Space left on device" on XFS

On 2011-10-07 15:51, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: Am 07.10.2011 12:12, schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 07.10.2011 10:41, schrieb Bernhard Schmidt: Basically the only problem with postfix here is that I cannot have queue_minfree> 2GB to be on the safe side, so I don't know how to avoid this problem have