> My initial thought was to save my existing config, then use webmin to build a
> config and compare the two. if they are miles apart then drop the idea.
> Part of my reasoning here is that I am getting old and I need to farm out
> some
> of my work, most of the people that I have been asked to
- Original Message -
> From: /dev/rob0
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 8:24 AM
> Subject: Re: postscreen stats
> I'm going to disagree, slightly, with Stan and Wietse. The DNSBL
> scoring feature was formerly only available via a policy service, an
Take a look here
http://www.artica.fr/index.php/screenshots
Open Source solution.
Tried to perform Complex settings such has multiples postfix instances
Postfix upgrade by compilation supported
Can act has mailbox server
Load balancing and PowerDNS support.
LDAP and ActiveDirectory support
PostSc
> I'm going to disagree, slightly, with Stan and Wietse. The DNSBL
> scoring feature was formerly only available via a policy service, and
> it seems to have improved my spam blocking somewhat. I have aggressive
> DNSBLs, which I'd never trust for reject_rbl_client, set with low
> scores.
Yeah
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 14:12:00 -0400, Munroe Sollog wrote:
under its purview, but after reading its configuration and
documentation, I don't think it supports this out of the box. Thanks.
why not use spf ?, policyd v2 have spf support, spf data dont need to
be public in dns if its just local se
On 08/27/2011 01:52 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 14:12:00 -0400, Munroe Sollog wrote:
under its purview, but after reading its configuration and
documentation, I don't think it supports this out of the box. Thanks.
why not use spf ?, policyd v2 have spf support, spf data dont
