> I'm going to disagree, slightly, with Stan and Wietse. The DNSBL > scoring feature was formerly only available via a policy service, and > it seems to have improved my spam blocking somewhat. I have aggressive > DNSBLs, which I'd never trust for reject_rbl_client, set with low > scores.
Yeah, the weighting of dnsbls is a very very good feature. However for whats it worth: day pconnect sconnect relayed 21 1586 570 304 22 1726 634 474 23 3642 1629 603 24 4111 1867 460 25 3927 1782 460 26 4544 2356 468 pconnect = connections to postscreen sconnect = connections handed from postscreen to smtpd the difference between p and s-connect is what postscreen blocked (or timeout). relayed=mails relayed to another mailserver (found clean) the difference between sconnect and relayed is what other filters blocked (or timeout) That's on a currently low-volume mailgateway. Jean // wdp
