Hello list,
While using ubuntu 10.10, postfix 2.8.1, dovecot 2.0.12, openssl
0.9.8o, and trying to connect to the mail server via postfix
'submission' the best cipher that I am able to get is
DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)
As it is only the 11th entry in the list showed by
openssl ciphers -v
LinkedIn
Eric Magutu, CAPM requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn:
--
James,
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- Eric Magutu, CAPM
Accept invitation from Eric Magutu, CAPM
http://www.linkedin.com/e/ekybff-gn
Hi,
i'm curious if there is a mechanism to stop postfix from delivering mail
for just specific recipients. I ask because i need to migrate some users
mail storage and need to umount it. It would be nice to generate no
errors and just hold the mails in the queue until i release them again.
greeting
On 05/22/2011 04:24 PM Leon Meßner wrote:
> Hi,
> i'm curious if there is a mechanism to stop postfix from delivering mail
> for just specific recipients. I ask because i need to migrate some users
> mail storage and need to umount it. It would be nice to generate no
> errors and just hold the mail
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 04:39:22PM +0200, Pascal Volk wrote:
> On 05/22/2011 04:24 PM Leon Meßner wrote:
> > Hi,
> > i'm curious if there is a mechanism to stop postfix from delivering mail
> > for just specific recipients. I ask because i need to migrate some users
> > mail storage and need to umo
On 05/22/2011 05:16 PM Leon Meßner wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 04:39:22PM +0200, Pascal Volk wrote:
>> …
>> /etc/postfix/transport:
>> john@example.comretry:4.0.0 Mailbox being migrated
>> jane@exmpale.comretry:4.0.0 Mailbox being migrated
>> …
>
> If i understand r
* Leon Meßner :
> Hi,
> i'm curious if there is a mechanism to stop postfix from delivering mail
> for just specific recipients. I ask because i need to migrate some users
> mail storage and need to umount it. It would be nice to generate no
> errors and just hold the mails in the queue until i rel
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 17:16:52 +0200, Leon Meßner wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 04:39:22PM +0200, Pascal Volk wrote:
> > On 05/22/2011 04:24 PM Leon Meßner wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > i'm curious if there is a mechanism to stop postfix from delivering mail
> > > for just specific recipients. I ask b
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 20:38:09 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Leon Meßner :
> > Hi,
> > i'm curious if there is a mechanism to stop postfix from delivering mail
> > for just specific recipients. I ask because i need to migrate some users
> > mail storage and need to umount it. It would be nice
Le 21/05/2011 20:19, Reindl Harald a écrit :
> hi
>
> is there any recommended way to implement SRS (Sender Rewrite Scheme) in
> Postfix
> to get rid of SPF warnings/blocks for via "virtual_alias_maps" forwarded
> messages?
>
if you want to implement SRS, then you'll need to deliver to an exter
Am 22.05.2011 22:22, schrieb mouss:
> Le 21/05/2011 20:19, Reindl Harald a écrit :
>> hi
>>
>> is there any recommended way to implement SRS (Sender Rewrite Scheme) in
>> Postfix
>> to get rid of SPF warnings/blocks for via "virtual_alias_maps" forwarded
>> messages?
>>
>
> if you want to imple
On 05/22/2011 09:06 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 17:16:52 +0200, Leon Meßner wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 04:39:22PM +0200, Pascal Volk wrote:
On 05/22/2011 04:24 PM Leon Meßner wrote:
Hi,
i'm curious if there is a mechanism to stop postfix from delivering mail
for just spe
I've recently been keeping an eye on my mail statistics
usingmailgraph http://mailgraph.schweikert.ch/ . I'm impressed by
the amount of spam/rejections achieved using just postgrey and some
postfix restrictions.
One thing that is puzzling me is the number of sent/received msgs.
eg today's stats h
Hello Troy,
Monday, May 23, 2011, 12:25:40 AM, you wrote:
> I've recently been keeping an eye on my mail statistics
> usingmailgraph http://mailgraph.schweikert.ch/ . I'm impressed by
> the amount of spam/rejections achieved using just postgrey and some
> postfix restrictions.
> One thing that
On 05/23/2011 01:25 AM, Troy Piggins wrote:
I've recently been keeping an eye on my mail statistics
usingmailgraph http://mailgraph.schweikert.ch/ . I'm impressed by
the amount of spam/rejections achieved using just postgrey and some
postfix restrictions.
One thing that is puzzling me is the nu
* Jeroen Geilman wrote :
>* On 05/23/2011 01:25 AM, Troy Piggins wrote:
>> I've recently been keeping an eye on my mail statistics
>> usingmailgraph http://mailgraph.schweikert.ch/ . I'm impressed by
>> the amount of spam/rejections achieved using just postgrey and some
>> postfix restrictions.
>>
Hello All,
Assume the following setup:
Client from xyz.com logins to Many_Companies.com, accesses their email
campaign software running on Many_Companies.com and sends out newsletters.
A short time later a client from def.com logins to Many_Companies.com,
accesses their email campaign softwa
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 23:57:18 +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 05/22/2011 09:06 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> >On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 17:16:52 +0200, Leon Meßner wrote:
> >
> >>On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 04:39:22PM +0200, Pascal Volk wrote:
> >>>On 05/22/2011 04:24 PM Leon Meßner wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
I have come across the following error when one of my clients try to
send mail to a party using mobile broadband. I think barracuda looks at
the client's IP address (given by mobile broadband). How can I tackle
this? I know that you can do header check on postfix and remove the line
where
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 07:37:16 +0530, Janantha Marasinghe wrote:
> I have come across the following error when one of my clients try to
> send mail to a party using mobile broadband. I think barracuda looks
> at the client's IP address (given by mobile broadband). How can I
> tackle this? I know t
I'm changing an active Postfix server (with a single domain) to be able to
support additional virtual domains (using MySQL). I'm slightly confused and
would appreciate some advice: does the existing active domain need to be
migrated into MySQL, or can it live outside (and alongside)? There are o
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 19:33:03 -0700, Des Dougan wrote:
> I'm changing an active Postfix server (with a single domain) to be
> able to support additional virtual domains (using MySQL). I'm slightly
> confused and would appreciate some advice: does the existing active
> domain need to be migrated i
Thanks, Sahil. What's the best way of doing that?
Regards,
Des
On May 2011, at 7:42 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 19:33:03 -0700, Des Dougan wrote:
>
>> I'm changing an active Postfix server (with a single domain) to be
>> able to support additional virtual domains (using MyS
On 5/22/2011 4:27 AM, Mark Alan wrote:
Hello list,
While using ubuntu 10.10, postfix 2.8.1, dovecot 2.0.12, openssl
0.9.8o, and trying to connect to the mail server via postfix
'submission' the best cipher that I am able to get is
DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)
As it is only the 11th entry
* Mark Homoky wrote :
>* Monday, May 23, 2011, 12:25:40 AM, you wrote:
>
>> I've recently been keeping an eye on my mail statistics
>> usingmailgraph http://mailgraph.schweikert.ch/ . I'm impressed by
>> the amount of spam/rejections achieved using just postgrey and some
>> postfix restrictions.
Hello
Anyone could tell me which Linux distro have the most
recent stable Postfix available as a package ?
Thanks
Tell the postmaster at the receiving end that they are blocking legitimate mail
thanks to overly aggressive (ie. brain dead) settings from Barracuda. It
should not matter at all the IP address of the person sending an email.
Jim
On May 22, 2011, at 9:07 PM, Janantha Marasinghe wrote:
> Hi,
>
Le 22/05/2011 23:33, Reindl Harald a écrit :
>
>
> Am 22.05.2011 22:22, schrieb mouss:
>> Le 21/05/2011 20:19, Reindl Harald a écrit :
>>> hi
>>>
>>> is there any recommended way to implement SRS (Sender Rewrite Scheme) in
>>> Postfix
>>> to get rid of SPF warnings/blocks for via "virtual_alias_
> Tell the postmaster at the receiving end that they are blocking
> legitimate mail thanks to overly aggressive (ie. brain dead)
> settings from Barracuda. It should not matter at all the IP
> address of the person sending an email.
And if the postmaster at the receiving end assumes that if this
Hi,
We are running Postfix 2.8.1 with Dovecot 1.2.12 on CentOS 5.6 (64 bit)
on a VM. The system is in production.
From time to time (about 2-3 times a week), I get an error "fatal: lock
file defer : defer service failure". After that, it seems to
continue normally, without any intervention.
On 23/5/2011 8:55 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Can someone please provide some insight to the problem and suggest a
solution?
With some googling I found this rather old message:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2004-03/2663.html where
Wietse suggested to increase the var_floc
Am 23.05.2011 06:47, schrieb Frank Bonnet:
> Hello
>
> Anyone could tell me which Linux distro have the most
> recent stable Postfix available as a package ?
this question is nonsense because it depends on random
when was the last releease of the distribution and what
major-version was out in t
32 matches
Mail list logo
