Re: relayhost with remote smtp auth

2011-05-17 Thread Mike Brack
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Mike Brack: >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: >> > On 05/15/2011 02:45 PM, ITSec_Mike wrote: > there is no mention of forwarding credentials. Does anybody know a smtp proxy which can do that? -- Thanks, Mike

An Invitation to Neuroscientists and Physicists: Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Reports First Hand Account of Mind Intrusion and Mind Reading

2011-05-17 Thread Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
16 May 2011 Monday 7:28 P.M. Singapore Time For Immediate Release SINGAPORE, SINGAPORE - Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) would like to report first hand account of mind intrusion and mind reading. I have been hearing voices for quite some time now but I have not been able to i

Re: [OT] Google 7720 Error [thread resumed due to useful data]

2011-05-17 Thread Mihira Fernando
On 05/17/2011 03:05 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: I'd hazard a guess that there's much more to Dr. Venema than Postfix, more than... queue the Transformers jingle. Is Dr. Venema hiding the all spark ? :P

Re: rate limiting spammers who have guessed passwords and use squirrelmail to inject into postfix

2011-05-17 Thread Larry Vaden
Larry Vaden texoma.net> writes: > > What are the URLs which describe BCP for this situation? > > THANKS for your response(s). > > kind regards/ldv I note Ralf encountered a very similar problem (see <>), but he's apparently not in today :

Re: rate limiting spammers who have guessed passwords and use squirrelmail to inject into postfix

2011-05-17 Thread Blake Hudson
Larry Vaden wrote: > Larry Vaden texoma.net> writes: >> What are the URLs which describe BCP for this situation? >> >> THANKS for your response(s). >> >> kind regards/ldv > I note Ralf encountered a very similar problem (see > < limiting--td20671270.html>>), but he

Timed out while sending message body

2011-05-17 Thread Tomasz K. Jarzynka
I am having trouble with delivering mail to a particular domain (both their MXs but they are in the same network). The error message is as follows: Apr 18 18:02:14 mailhub postfix/smtp[15595]: D71681493B35: conversation with smtp1.mnisw.gov.pl[195.187.32.7] timed out while sending message body

Re: Timed out while sending message body

2011-05-17 Thread Wietse Venema
Tomasz K. Jarzynka: > Finally, I ran a tcpdump on our origin mail server, our firewall > and the destinantion mail server (thanks to the help of its > administrator) but the output is inconclusive to me. On our side, > It looks like transmission stalls after a couple hundred bytes + > subsequent re

Re: relayhost with remote smtp auth

2011-05-17 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 09:54:35PM +0200, Mike Brack wrote: > > A Client connects to a postfix server. > > I know the sender email addresses which are allowed to connect to S1. > > The authentication on S1 should be delegated to SMTP AUTH on S2. > > How can this be achieved on S1? A suitable SASL

Re: Timed out while sending message body

2011-05-17 Thread Mark Martinec
> Tomasz K. Jarzynka: > > Finally, I ran a tcpdump on our origin mail server, our firewall > > and the destinantion mail server (thanks to the help of its > > administrator) but the output is inconclusive to me. On our side, > > It looks like transmission stalls after a couple hundred bytes + > > s

Shell Scripts in Postfix

2011-05-17 Thread Yessica De Ascencao
Hi people! I have my system in an internal email using Postfix. I saw this way of implementing a filter. However, I am trying script 1 #!/bin/sh 2 3 # Simple shell-based filter. It is meant to be invoked as follows: 4 # /path/to/script -f sender recipients... 5 6 # Localize these. The

limiting connection re-use

2011-05-17 Thread Vick Khera
I had a huge backlog to cox.net the other day on one of my servers. Their postmaster gave me the following issues they observed with us, which caused them to temporarily block the server: 1. Your mailserver is attempting to communicate too soon within the SMTP transaction. Ensure that your sending

Custom Controlling Defer Queue!

2011-05-17 Thread afshin afzali
Hi Postfixers, I need to get custom control over defer queue. My emails need to be sent in specified time-frame. To do this I need to confirm returning an email to active queue. Regards, -- Afshin Afzali

Re: limiting connection re-use

2011-05-17 Thread Wietse Venema
Vick Khera: > I had a huge backlog to cox.net the other day on one of my servers. > Their postmaster gave me the following issues they observed with us, > which caused them to temporarily block the server: > > 1. Your mailserver is attempting to communicate too soon within the > SMTP transaction.

Re: Custom Controlling Defer Queue!

2011-05-17 Thread Wietse Venema
afshin afzali: > Hi Postfixers, > > I need to get custom control over defer queue. My emails need to > be sent in specified time-frame. /etc/postfix/main.cf: maximal_queue_lifetime = 3600s maximal_backoff_time = 600s This retries mail approximately six times until it is approximately one

Re: Custom Controlling Defer Queue!

2011-05-17 Thread afshin afzali
hi wietse,I need further control over defer queue。 actually Im going to use postfix as cross switch between multiple kind of messaging media such as voice and sms。to do this,message sender needs to specify time frame that the message must be send,i.e. 9—12 AM. I think if there is a hook that i coul

Re: Custom Controlling Defer Queue!

2011-05-17 Thread Wietse Venema
afshin afzali: > I need to get custom control over defer queue. My emails need to > be sent in specified time-frame. Wietse: > /etc/postfix/main.cf: >maximal_queue_lifetime = 3600s >maximal_backoff_time = 600s > > This retries mail approximately six times until it is approximately > one h

Re: limiting connection re-use

2011-05-17 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 01:17:38PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > > 2. Your mailserver is attempting to send more than 100 messages in one > > session. > > > As for item 2, the only limit postfix allows me to set is the time > > that the connection will be reused. The default 300s seems too larg

Cannot stop spam originated ON server

2011-05-17 Thread Mariano Aliaga
Hi, I'm currently running a Postfix (2.7.1) + Amavisd-new server. I think it's been somehow comprimised, because I'm seeing spams being originated from localhost, and as 127.0.0.1 is listed on mynetworks, it is accepted and sent to amavis which sometimes stops it, and sometimes not. My questi

Re: Cannot stop spam originated ON server

2011-05-17 Thread Wietse Venema
Mariano Aliaga: > Hi, >I'm currently running a Postfix (2.7.1) + Amavisd-new server. I > think it's been somehow comprimised, because I'm seeing spams being > originated from localhost, and as 127.0.0.1 is listed on mynetworks, > it is accepted and sent to amavis which sometimes stops it, and >

Re: Cannot stop spam originated ON server

2011-05-17 Thread Mariano Aliaga
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Mariano Aliaga: >> Hi, >>    I'm currently running a Postfix (2.7.1) + Amavisd-new server. I >> think it's been somehow comprimised, because I'm seeing spams being >> originated from localhost, and as 127.0.0.1 is listed on mynetworks, >> it

Re: limiting connection re-use

2011-05-17 Thread Vick Khera
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: >> 1. Your mailserver is attempting to communicate too soon within the >> SMTP transaction. Ensure that your sending server is RFC >> 5321-compliant, and is following the proper SMTP protocol standards. > > Amazingly, for the past two years Pos

Re: limiting connection re-use

2011-05-17 Thread Vick Khera
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: >> > 2. Your mailserver is attempting to send more than 100 messages in one >> > session. >> >> > As for item 2, the only limit postfix allows me to set is the time >> > that the connection will be reused.  The default 300s seems too large >

Re: Cannot stop spam originated ON server

2011-05-17 Thread Noel Jones
On 5/17/2011 3:49 PM, Mariano Aliaga wrote: On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Mariano Aliaga: Hi, I'm currently running a Postfix (2.7.1) + Amavisd-new server. I think it's been somehow comprimised, because I'm seeing spams being originated from localhost, and as 127.0.

Re: Shell Scripts in Postfix

2011-05-17 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 05/17/2011 06:22 PM, Yessica De Ascencao wrote: Hi people! I have my system in an internal email using Postfix. I saw this way of implementing a filter. However, I am trying script 1 #!/bin/sh 2 3 # Simple shell-based filter. It is meant to be invoked as follows: 4 # /path/to/s

Re: limiting connection re-use

2011-05-17 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 05:18:04PM -0400, Vick Khera wrote: > > Note, instead of forcing random contortions on clients, a server that > > wants to enforce this feature should simply reply with 421 to RSET after > > 100 transactions, and Postfix will politely abandon the connection and > > try a ne

Re: Shell Scripts in Postfix

2011-05-17 Thread Wietse Venema
Yessica De Ascencao: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > Hi people! > > I have my system in an internal email using Postfix. > I saw this way of implementing a filter. However, I am trying script > > 1 #!/bin/sh > 2 > 3 # Simple shell-based filter. It is meant to be invoked as