Re: posfix rejected from google server

Am 02.03.2011 08:56, schrieb Eero Volotinen: >> So I can nothing to do with it (in Postfix) config - just to degrade >> Postfix with "relayhost" to my ISP SMTP server - what is exactly >> what I have did not want. > > No need to route all mails to isp, just route needed mails. (for example > all

Re: Postfix und SSL client problem.

Hello, I HAVE TO apologize me :-) I had present my solution with stunnel4- and now I see (as wrote by - thanks) it is in http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html#client_smtps. So it shows again the Great Truth - RTFM! Sorry. So at least I also see, that this is normal solution with Postfix.

Re: Transport Mapping

On 3/1/2011 11:13 PM, Seelke, Eddie wrote: I have a VPS setup that is running two websites. I am using Virtualmin to manage these two sites. On deluxetech.com, I have WHMCS installed and am using Google Apps for email. I have Google Apps setup so that any email not recognized is automatically fo

Re: posfix rejected from google server

Zitat von kapetr : Thanks all for replays. Just few remarks: 1. RDNS - e.g. for den...@bestcheer.com, li...@dguhl.org, ... that's what I had try to correct with myhostname = 108.234.broadband4.iol.cz yes - it is what I get with dig -x , so then dig 108.234.broadband4.iol.cz == this address

Re: RESOLVED: suddenly getting these in my mail.log: dsn=4.4.3, status=deferred (Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=external.com type=MX: Host not found, try again)

On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 07:00:43PM -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote: > [ top-posting fixed, please don't do that ] > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 05:34:50PM -0700, Jeff Orrok wrote: > > On 3/1/2011 4:57 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > >See: > > >http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#no_chroot > > > > > >and pl

authorizing relays via script

postfix-2.8.1,1 on FreeBSD 8 Hi all, I'm looking to automate mailing of user reports with a perl script that sends a message via a postfix server. The postfix server is configured to use virtual domains, and all users in these domains can send and receive messages. The script's recipients are al

Re: authorizing relays via script

On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 07:26:55AM -0800, David Newman wrote: > I'm looking to automate mailing of user reports with a perl script > that sends a message via a postfix server. The postfix server is > configured to use virtual domains, and all users in these domains > can send and receive message

Re: authorizing relays via script

On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 10:11:38AM -0600, I wrote without reading: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 07:26:55AM -0800, David Newman wrote: > > The error message in maillog is like this: > > > > Mar 1 13:30:04 mail3 postfix/smtpd[99904]: NOQUEUE: reject: > > RCPT from hostB.networktest.com[1.2.3.4]: 550 5.

Re: RESOLVED: suddenly getting these in my mail.log: dsn=4.4.3, status=deferred (Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=external.com type=MX: Host not found, try again)

On 3/1/2011 5:45 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: chroot requires the correct installation of copies of system files under /var/spool/postfix/etc, /var/spool/postfix/lib, and so on. Your client probably lost or corrupted some file there. chroot is intended for people with unusual security requirements,

Re: Postfix und SSL client problem.

On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 09:15:24AM +0100, kapetr wrote: > Hello, > > I HAVE TO apologize me :-) > > I had present my solution with stunnel4- and now I see (as wrote by > - thanks) it is in > http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html#client_smtps. Note, however, that stunnel will not by default v

Re: Transport Mapping

On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 10:13:50PM -0600, Seelke, Eddie wrote: > 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table This means the recipient address domain is listed in virtual_alias_domains, and the address was not rewritten by virtual_alias_maps into a real domain. See htt

Re: RESOLVED: suddenly getting these in my mail.log: dsn=4.4.3, status=deferred (Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=external.com type=MX: Host not found, try again)

Jeff Orrok: > google if the error associated with > http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#no_chroot was present right > there in that section. If it were a wiki, I could edit it to include Sorry, it would be naive to assume that there is only one type of error associated with a broken chroo

Re: posfix rejected from google server

On 02/03/11 08:02, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 02.03.2011 08:56, schrieb Eero Volotinen: So I can nothing to do with it (in Postfix) config - just to degrade Postfix with "relayhost" to my ISP SMTP server - what is exactly what I have did not want. No need to route all mails to isp, just route n

Re: mysql GPL/postfix IPL incompatibility

--On Tuesday, March 01, 2011 10:06 AM +0100 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: * Quanah Gibson-Mount : Sorry, I apologize. Particularly as someone who sees my own name often misspelled. ;) What is the origin of "Quanah"? No relation, and I have no know

info about a Sendmail configuration

Hi to all! Sorry for my question about Sendmail and not Postfix.. but I'm in trouble! Here the question. I've a Red Hat server (hostA.domain1.dom) that should send mail trough an Exchange server (hostB.domain2.dom) to a destination address. The Exchange rejects the message because it does not reco

RE: info about a Sendmail configuration

I just checked and here's the solution. http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-networking-3/need-sendmail-guru-149821/#post778024 It was a google's answer. :) good luck. ALFONSO. -Mensaje original- De: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] En n

Odd Time Stamp Showing Up In Logs

Greetings, Every so often in the maillogs I see something like this: Mar 2 20:43:12 triata postfix/smtpd[14482]: disconnect from unknown[127.0.0.1] This was taken from about 10 minutes ago. The odd thing here is the time stamp. It's saying 8 PM, and it's 1 PM US MST. All of the other tim

Re: Odd Time Stamp Showing Up In Logs

On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 01:51:25PM -0700, Asai wrote: > Every so often in the maillogs I see something like this: > Mar 2 20:43:12 triata postfix/smtpd[14482]: disconnect from > unknown[127.0.0.1] > > This was taken from about 10 minutes ago. The odd thing here is > the time stamp. It's saying

Re: mysql GPL/postfix IPL incompatibility

Le 01/03/2011 11:25, Matthias Andree a écrit : > Am 28.02.2011 23:57, schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount: > >> The main issue I see at the moment really is the inability to legally >> link Postfix to MySQL, removing a valuable piece of Postfix functionality. > > Not a loss. If MySQL and Postfix turn ou

Re: mysql GPL/postfix IPL incompatibility

Le 01/03/2011 10:09, Ralf Hildebrandt a écrit : > * Victor Duchovni : > >> This is a legal question. The postfix-mysql loadable object links >> Postfix table driver code available under the IPL against the MySQL >> shared library. Whether this is allowed under the MySQL license is >> not completel

Re: Odd Time Stamp Showing Up In Logs

Le 02/03/2011 21:51, Asai a écrit : > Greetings, > > Every so often in the maillogs I see something like this: > Mar 2 20:43:12 triata postfix/smtpd[14482]: disconnect from > unknown[127.0.0.1] > > This was taken from about 10 minutes ago. The odd thing here is the > time stamp. It's saying 8

slow transport, master.cf and maxproc value

Hello, I have this Postfix configuration : all mail destined for domain.tld are relayed by the "slow" transport. # in main.cf : transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport # in /etc/postfix/transport domain.tld slow: # in master.cf : slow unix - - n - 5 s

Re: Update Postfix transport file on multiple servers

Le 01/03/2011 06:37, Luis Esteves a écrit : > > Hi, > > Good idea. > > I'll soon install a centralized logs server (with rsync) for logs retention > an alalysis, maybe I will use this server to update Postfix files. It will > be in the trusted network, so, I will generate SSH Keys. The private K

Re: slow transport, master.cf and maxproc value

On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 11:23:45PM +0100, Myrdhin wrote: > # in main.cf : > transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport > > # in /etc/postfix/transport > domain.tld slow: > > # in master.cf : > slow unix - - n - 5 smtp -v -o > smtp_destination_concurrency_limi

Re: Update Postfix transport file on multiple servers

Le 01/03/2011 10:51, aa a écrit : > And what about using a shared disk space on a single machine that contains > configuration file of every mail server. > Every machine that has postfix can access these configuration files using > samba or NFS...a kind of shared folder that can be contained on a p

Re: Odd Time Stamp Showing Up In Logs

On 3/2/2011 3:14 PM, mouss wrote: Le 02/03/2011 21:51, Asai a écrit : Greetings, Every so often in the maillogs I see something like this: Mar 2 20:43:12 triata postfix/smtpd[14482]: disconnect from unknown[127.0.0.1] This was taken from about 10 minutes ago. The odd thing here is the time s

Re : slow transport, master.cf and maxproc value

Thanks for your response Victor. So, if i want max 3 connections (to domain.tld), is this configuration could work (?) : # in main.cf : transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport slow_destination_concurrency_limit=3 # in /etc/postfix/transport domain.tld slow: # in master.cf : slow unix

Re: Odd Time Stamp Showing Up In Logs

On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 03:37:44PM -0700, Asai wrote: > smtpinet n - n - - smtpd > 587 inet n - n - - smtpd > 127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - y - - smtpd The first two are fine, the third

Re: Odd Time Stamp Showing Up In Logs

On 3/2/2011 2:24 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote: On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 01:51:25PM -0700, Asai wrote: Every so often in the maillogs I see something like this: Mar 2 20:43:12 triata postfix/smtpd[14482]: disconnect from unknown[127.0.0.1] This was taken from about 10 minutes ago. The odd thing here is

Re: Odd Time Stamp Showing Up In Logs

On 3/2/2011 3:43 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 03:37:44PM -0700, Asai wrote: smtpinet n - n - - smtpd 587 inet n - n - - smtpd 127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - y - -

Re: Re : slow transport, master.cf and maxproc value

On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 10:42:47PM +, myrdhin bzh wrote: > Thanks for your response Victor. > So, if i want max 3 connections (to domain.tld), is this configuration could > work (?) : > > # in main.cf : > transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport > slow_destination_concurrency_limit=3 Ye

Re : Re : slow transport, master.cf and maxproc value

>> # in master.cf : >> slow unix - - n - 5 smtp > Something like that. The "5" process limit will mean that with multiple > "slow" domains at most 5 delivery processes will be used in total for > all "slow" destinations. This may not be what you want. It can ho

Re: Re : Re : slow transport, master.cf and maxproc value

On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 10:58:43PM +, myrdhin bzh wrote: > >> # in master.cf : > > >> slow unix - - n - 5 smtp > > > Something like that. The "5" process limit will mean that with multiple > > "slow" domains at most 5 delivery processes will be used in tot

Re : Re : Re : slow transport, master.cf and maxproc value

Thank you for your help. I'll try your solution. -- Myrdhin,

question on smtp_sasl_password_maps

greetings Configuring Sender-Dependent SASL authentication there is a a line in the docs thats says, " If you are creative, then you can try to combine the two tables into one single MySQL database, and configure different Postfix queries to extract the appropriate information." I would like to

Re: question on smtp_sasl_password_maps

On Mar 2, 2011, at 10:22 PM, jeffrey j donovan wrote: > snip > also,.. the passwords listed in sasl_passwd, if i can't use ldap whats the > best way to generate these. Im sketchy about plain text passwords sitting on > a file; sshken openldap htpass hand written binary ? never mind I found sas

Re: segv on tls_disable_workarounds (I must be doing something wrong!)

On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 01:03:07PM +0900, peter evans wrote: > I must have done something wrong, this is the first time I have managed > to kill anything postfixy in many years. > > (dbx) print *cst > *cst = { > name = 0x80888c0 "tls_disable_workarounds" > defval = (nil) > target =

Re: posfix rejected from google server

Hello.. On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:11:53 + Ned Slider wrote: > > >I think the original poster has bigger problems as his IP is listed >on a >>few DNSBLs: > >Enter server IP Address followed by [ENTER] to begin. > >RUNNING CHECKS FOR 85.71.234.108 >+

Re: posfix rejected from google server

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:44 PM, kapetr wrote: > So once again, I am not spamer! > I hate spam and spamers !! Being on a blacklist doesn't automatically make you a spammer, but it does mean something's wrong (possibly with your Postfix config... to keep things back on topic). Check here to see w

Re: posfix rejected from google server

On 03/03/2011 07:55 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote: On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:44 PM, kapetr wrote: So once again, I am not spamer! I hate spam and spamers !! Being on a blacklist doesn't automatically make you a spammer, but it does mean something's wrong (possibly with your Postfix config... to kee

Re: mysql GPL/postfix IPL incompatibility

* mouss : > seems promissing, but a fork like that requires a year or so to see > what gets out of it. so either the guys are very good and they'll get > out with a great success, or the project will die. Yes. Promising, to say the least. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Ne