Andrew Gaydenko put forth on 2/23/2011 1:24 AM:
> Hi!
>
> After switching to another ISP I have a problem in running _local_ postfix
> server (I use it for outgoing messages _only_) - the ISP doesn't support
> reverse DNS. A s a result, other MTA are not happy with my one.
>
> So, the question
Hello,
We have a problem in SMTP communication with some external mailservers.
I will explain.
If i do a telnet to port 25 on a remote server, I get no greeting
message, it just waits. I suppose this is some greeting delay for anti spam.
But the greeting never comes. But if i press a carriage
On Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:52:32 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Andrew Gaydenko put forth on 2/23/2011 1:24 AM:
> > Hi!
> >
> > After switching to another ISP I have a problem in running _local_
> > postfix server (I use it for outgoing messages _only_) - the ISP doesn't
> > support reverse DNS. A
* Richard Smits :
> Hello,
>
> We have a problem in SMTP communication with some external
> mailservers. I will explain.
> If i do a telnet to port 25 on a remote server, I get no greeting
> message, it just waits. I suppose this is some greeting delay for
> anti spam.
It comes after 40s!
--
Ra
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * Richard Smits :
> > Hello,
> >
> > We have a problem in SMTP communication with some external
> > mailservers. I will explain.
> > If i do a telnet to port 25 on a remote server, I get no greeting
> > message, it just waits. I suppose this is some greeting delay for
> > an
Zitat von Ralf Hildebrandt :
* Richard Smits :
Hello,
We have a problem in SMTP communication with some external
mailservers. I will explain.
If i do a telnet to port 25 on a remote server, I get no greeting
message, it just waits. I suppose this is some greeting delay for
anti spam.
It come
Hello list,
I think I have read some time ago in this mailing list that it is possible to
not announce certain capabilities on a per client basis. I am not sure if I
really have read that or if it was something completely other.
Anyway... I can not find anything in the Postfix documentation how
* Steve :
> Hello list,
>
> I think I have read some time ago in this mailing list that it is
> possible to not announce certain capabilities on a per client basis. I
> am not sure if I really have read that or if it was something
> completely other.
Yes
> Anyway... I can not find anything in t
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:00:47 +0100
> Von: Ralf Hildebrandt
> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Betreff: Re: Disable anouncment of STARTTLS on a per client basis
> * Steve :
> > Hello list,
> >
> > I think I have read some time ago in this mailing list th
On 02/23/2011 11:56 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Ralf Hildebrandt :
* Richard Smits :
Hello,
We have a problem in SMTP communication with some external
mailservers. I will explain.
If i do a telnet to port 25 on a remote server, I get no greeting
message, it just waits. I suppose
The same with postfix 1.8.1
The first one respects "default_transport = error:5.1.2 mail to remote domains
not permitted" but the second one
must be catched with "relayhost = 127.0.0.1" to prevent relay to the internet
which is also active while sending
the first testmail but "relayhost" should
On 2/22/2011 11:44 PM, Robert Goodyear wrote:
On Feb 22, 2011, at 9:06 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/22/2011 9:29 PM, Robert Goodyear wrote:
The postfix connection caching algorithm will automatically limit the damage
caused by a subset of slow-responding relayhosts.
I suppose there's a tip
Zitat von Richard Smits :
On 02/23/2011 11:56 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Ralf Hildebrandt :
* Richard Smits :
Hello,
We have a problem in SMTP communication with some external
mailservers. I will explain.
If i do a telnet to port 25 on a remote server, I get no greeting
messag
Reindl Harald:
> The same with postfix 1.8.1
>
> The first one respects "default_transport = error:5.1.2 mail to remote dom
>-ains not permitted" but the second one
> must be catched with "relayhost = 127.0.0.1" to prevent relay to the inter
>-net which is also active while sending
> the first tes
Hi,
> Postfix stable release 2.8.1 is available. This release fixes one
> "signal 11" bug with SMTP server debug logging, and cleans up some
> code and documentation.
Ubuntu packages done.
https://launchpad.net/~christian-roessner-net/+archive/ppa
- I dropped HP-UX patches from Debain, as they
On Wednesday, February 23, 2011 09:02:09 am Christian Roessner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Postfix stable release 2.8.1 is available. This release fixes one
> > "signal 11" bug with SMTP server debug logging, and cleans up some
> > code and documentation.
>
> Ubuntu packages done.
>
> https://launchpad.n
Am 23.02.2011 14:44, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> If you have a problem with Postfix, and you would like to see that
> problem fixed, then you need to provide ONE SIMPLE EXAMPLE that
> reproduces the problem.
This is a example, i do not know how to make it simpler
because there is only one line in
Reindl Harald:
> Am 23.02.2011 14:44, schrieb Wietse Venema:
>
> > If you have a problem with Postfix, and you would like to see that
> > problem fixed, then you need to provide ONE SIMPLE EXAMPLE that
> > reproduces the problem.
>
> This is a example, i do not know how to make it simpler
> becau
Wietse Venema:
> Reindl Harald:
> > Am 23.02.2011 14:44, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> >
> > > If you have a problem with Postfix, and you would like to see that
> > > problem fixed, then you need to provide ONE SIMPLE EXAMPLE that
> > > reproduces the problem.
> >
> > This is a example, i do not know
Hi,
> > - I dropped HP-UX patches from Debain, as they are useless in Ubuntu
> > - I dropped chroot environment, as discussed lately on this list
>
> What to do about chrooting by default is a conversation we should have at the
> distro level. I know it's a long standing disagreement between u
Sorry that was the wrong line :-(
default_transport = error:5.1.2 mail to remote domains not permitted
in my understanding postfix should never relay any message outside
after this is set, but it happens on some target domains / subdomains
Am 23.02.2011 15:27, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Reindl Har
Reindl Harald:
> Sorry that was the wrong line :-(
>
> default_transport = error:5.1.2 mail to remote domains not permitted
>
See http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail for how to submit
a proper error report.
You violated rule number 1: provide "postconf -n" output instead
of pasting li
On Wednesday, February 23, 2011 09:33:35 am Christian Roessner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > - I dropped HP-UX patches from Debain, as they are useless in Ubuntu
> > > - I dropped chroot environment, as discussed lately on this list
> >
> > What to do about chrooting by default is a conversation we should
Hi,
> > I have not modified the init script, so people still can do chrooting
> > and the init script will work as always.
>
> I didn't take anything. The primary maintainer of the package uploaded 2.8.0
> much as he always does. As I said before, this isn't the place to discuss
> it.
> Thi
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:52:32AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > Example config would be very appreciated.
>
> Short version:
> http://www.hardwarefreak.com/postfix-adsl-relay-config.txt
>
> Long version:
> http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#client_sasl
Also:
http://www.postfix.org/
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:43:36PM -0400, D G Teed wrote:
> Tonight I noticed 2.8.1 is released as well. Thanks.
> I've compiled this. It wasn't clear to
> me at first, but I see 3 is a default log level
> if we don't specify anything for smtpd_tls_loglevel.
No, the default loglevel is "0".
--
Sorry, here the output of "postconf -n" and some more information
"de.bp.com" does not exist anywhere and so why the sceond log entry?
Feb 21 13:23:05 postfix/smtpd[13782]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
localhost[127.0.0.1]: 550 5.1.2
: Recipient address rejected: mail to remote domains not
permitt
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:32:16PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> "de.bp.com" does not exist anywhere and so why the sceond log entry?
Subdomains of domains in mydestination are by default relay domains.
Set "relay_domains = " (empty) if you have no relay domains. For
relay_domains, Postfix uses "
Reindl Harald:
> Sorry, here the output of "postconf -n" and some more information
> "de.bp.com" does not exist anywhere and so why the sceond log entry?
Obviously, the address does not resolve to the default_transport.
To find out what the address DOES resolve to:
- Does the domain match $mydes
>> mydomain = myportaltech.com
>> myhostname = hostname
> Is this what postconf really returns or did you redact this?
Yes, I edited it. hostname was just the name of the host as
given by Unix command 'uname -n' or `hostname`
> I'm wondering why smtpd_recipient_restrictions didn't show here
Will
Am 23.02.2011 17:47, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:32:16PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> "de.bp.com" does not exist anywhere and so why the sceond log entry?
>
> Subdomains of domains in mydestination are by default relay domains.
> Set "relay_domains = " (empty) if you
On 2/23/2011 10:50 AM, sunhux G wrote:
Let me know if any other types of logging for smtpd/postfix that I may have
missed that will facilitate this troubleshooting.
Let's start over here.
Turn off all debugging and verbose logs. If someone wants to
see debug or verbose logs, they'll ask fo
Am 23.02.2011 17:49, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Reindl Harald:
>> Sorry, here the output of "postconf -n" and some more information
>> "de.bp.com" does not exist anywhere and so why the sceond log entry?
>
> Obviously, the address does not resolve to the default_transport.
this was not clear for
Hello i've a new strange question,
now i'm going to realize multiple server for single domain your forum
explain me perfectly
how to do so.
a...@example.com to postfix server1
b...@example.com to postfix server2
etc etc
I've a strange question is it possible to send an only one account to
ev
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:56:35PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> mysql-transport.cf:
> >> select transport from
> >> dbma_transports where mydestination like '%s'
> >> or mydestination like '%d'
> >> order by transport desc limit 1;
> >
> > This type of fuzzy "like" query is highly question
Am 23.02.2011 18:16, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:56:35PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
mysql-transport.cf:
select transport from
dbma_transports where mydestination like '%s'
or mydestination like '%d'
order by transport desc limit 1;
>>>
>>>
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 06:25:56PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> sender dependent relay hosts
> >
> > What's wrong with "mydestination = '%s'"? Why are you using "like '%s'"?
> > Surely the destination domain is not a wildcard pattern, but is rather
> > a literal string.
>
> Example:
>
> %s
Am 23.02.2011 18:29, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 06:25:56PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
sender dependent relay hosts
>>>
>>> What's wrong with "mydestination = '%s'"? Why are you using "like '%s'"?
>>> Surely the destination domain is not a wildcard pattern, but is
> cool - this means i do not need any like in any postfix-mysql-config what is
> faster because keys are used, nice to know, i wanted to get sure that there
> nothing fails while making this setup a year ago
Depending on what character set you are using, it could be a problem but the
fix is simpl
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 06:11:06PM +0100, Matteo Cazzador wrote:
> I've a strange question is it possible to send an only one account to every
> server?
>
> example
>
> i...@example.com to postfix server 1
> i...@example.com to postfix server 2
main.cf:
indexed = ${default_da
Am 23.02.2011 18:36, schrieb Gary Smith:
>> cool - this means i do not need any like in any postfix-mysql-config what is
>> faster because keys are used, nice to know, i wanted to get sure that there
>> nothing fails while making this setup a year ago
>
> Depending on what character set you are us
> > Depending on what character set you are using, it could be a problem
> > but the fix is simple, UPPER(%s) or LOWER(%s) (based on how your data is
> stored).
> > I agree to dumping LIKE for performance reasons
>
> the tables are all UTF8, but there is no relevant non-ascii data i choosed
> lik
Thank's a lot , i need to do the postmap command on sender_access files?
Il 22/02/2011 22:24, Victor Duchovni ha scritto:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 09:12:59PM +, Ned Slider wrote:
On 22/02/11 11:47, Matteo Cazzador wrote:
hello i've a strange question about a request, is it possible to cre
Matteo Cazzador put forth on 2/23/2011 11:49 AM:
> Thank's a lot , i need to do the postmap command on sender_access files?
> Il 22/02/2011 22:24, Victor Duchovni ha scritto:
>> indexed = ${default_database_type}:${config_directory}/
>> smtpd_sender_restrictions =
>> check_sender_ac
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:17:18PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Matteo Cazzador put forth on 2/23/2011 11:49 AM:
> > Thank's a lot , i need to do the postmap command on sender_access files?
>
> > Il 22/02/2011 22:24, Victor Duchovni ha scritto:
> >> indexed = ${default_database_type}:${con
On Feb 23, 2011, at 4:27 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 2/22/2011 11:44 PM, Robert Goodyear wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 22, 2011, at 9:06 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/22/2011 9:29 PM, Robert Goodyear wrote:
>>
>>> The postfix connection caching algorithm will automatically limit the
>>> damage cause
On 2011-02-23 11:50 AM, sunhux G wrote:
> Then I remove "-v" from smtpd in master.cf (& left behind "-D"), restarted
> The following is the maillog indicating mail being sent from
> gate1.mds.com.sg (this is the SMTP server of mds.com.sg domain,
> possibly it's the Exchange server) :
>
> Feb 23
I have a Postfix 2.5 server configured with a _destination_rate_delay of 12s
which should limit deliveries to a particular destination to 5 per minute.
On my reading of the documentation, a "destination" is the domain name of a
recipient of a message.
My problem is that we are sending emails to t
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 07:29:23PM -0800, Robert Goodyear wrote:
> As I understand it, the RELAYHOST parameter will allow an FQDN that,
> when bracketed, can skip MX lookup and just return the DNS result. If
> I use roundrobin A records for my mesh of MTAs out in my datacenters,
> I've got a reaso
On 2/23/2011 1:58 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
No additional "failover" unless you want some hosts to receive mail
only when it fails to deliver to others. I prefer hot-hot.
Just vocabulary question, what is "hot-hot"?
-DB
On 2/23/2011 12:50 PM, Robert Goodyear wrote:
So: the message is ready to send. Postfix queries DNS for my smarthost entry
and gets MTA1 = 10, MTA2 = 10. Postfix opens a connection to MTA1 which
responds with a 'not now, too busy' response. Does Postfix hold the MX record
in memory _for the d
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:56:15AM -0800, subacqua wrote:
> I have a Postfix 2.5 server configured with a _destination_rate_delay
> of 12s
Which patch level of 2.5?
> which should limit deliveries to a particular destination to
> 5 per minute.
Provided "destination" means recipient domain or m
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 01:09:24PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> For the same destination, postfix will remember a dead host across multiple
> messages, and not retry a known dead host for a period of time.
No. Postfix remembers dead destinations, not dead hosts. When a live
destination is served b
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:02:09PM -0500, Daniel Bromberg wrote:
>> No additional "failover" unless you want some hosts to receive mail
>> only when it fails to deliver to others. I prefer hot-hot.
>
> Just vocabulary question, what is "hot-hot"?
A high-availability term, in which both sides of a
On 23/02/11 19:13, Victor Duchovni wrote:
A server configured with miniscule message rate limits will suffer the
folly of its system administrator. Postfix reacts reasonably gracefully
to concurrency controls, but rate controls are evil and in my view one
should not support the folly of the fools
On Feb 23, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:02:09PM -0500, Daniel Bromberg wrote:
>
>>> No additional "failover" unless you want some hosts to receive mail
>>> only when it fails to deliver to others. I prefer hot-hot.
>>
>> Just vocabulary question, what i
On Feb 23, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 01:09:24PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
>
>> For the same destination, postfix will remember a dead host across multiple
>> messages, and not retry a known dead host for a period of time.
>
> No. Postfix remembers dead
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:49:34AM -0800, Robert Goodyear wrote:
> > Postfix remembers dead destinations, not dead hosts. When a live
> > destination is served by hosts a subset of which are down, demand
> > connection caching kicks in under load and reduces the frequency
> > of (probabilistically
On Feb 23, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:49:34AM -0800, Robert Goodyear wrote:
>
>>> Postfix remembers dead destinations, not dead hosts. When a live
>>> destination is served by hosts a subset of which are down, demand
>>> connection caching kicks in und
Today I upgraded a machine from the older 2.7.x series to the latest
2.8.1 and found a difference. This is from Debian Sid.
My previous relayhost configuration was:
$ postconf relayhost
relayhost = [mail]
$ host -t a mail
mail.proulx.com has address 192.168.9.3
$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
Bob Proulx:
> Today I upgraded a machine from the older 2.7.x series to the latest
> 2.8.1 and found a difference. This is from Debian Sid.
Please, review the RELEASE_NOTES file and look for the
section titled "Major changes - dns lookup.
If this file is not installed please complain to the
main
Hi everyone. Does anyone know how to set up Postfix to accept address or
domain literals? For example, I want people to be able to send a message to
postmaster@ip instead of just postmas...@domain.com. Any help will be
greatly appreciated. Thank you.
Linda Pagillo - Owner
LPDynamix
931-284-9291
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Bob Proulx:
> > Today I upgraded a machine from the older 2.7.x series to the latest
> > 2.8.1 and found a difference. This is from Debian Sid.
>
> Please, review the RELEASE_NOTES file and look for the
> section titled "Major changes - dns lookup.
Ah! I see it now. I ha
Le 24/02/2011 01:04, Linda Pagillo a écrit :
> Hi everyone. Does anyone know how to set up Postfix to accept address or
> domain literals? For example, I want people to be able to send a message to
> postmaster@ip instead of just postmas...@domain.com. Any help will be
> greatly appreciated. Thank
Linda Pagillo:
> Hi everyone. Does anyone know how to set up Postfix to accept address or
> domain literals? For example, I want people to be able to send a message to
> postmaster@ip instead of just postmas...@domain.com. Any help will be
> greatly appreciated. Thank you.
Postfix implements the S
Thank you Mouss. Yes, you are correct. I did indeed mean postmaster@[ip].
I'm not having any mail rejected. I was just wondering if Postfix accepts
mail to literals by default. I'm getting ready to install Postfix and I
wanted to be sure that I had this in my notes. I believe you answered my
questi
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:19:28PM -0800, Robert Goodyear wrote:
> I'm sorry... I was speaking lazily there. I meant a 4.X.X response
> that would cause the message to requeue and follow a retry/backoff
> rate algorithm.
Mere 4XX responses to "MAIL FROM:", "RCPT TO:", "DATA" or "." don't impact
a
Hello List,
I have a email address say staff@domain that maps perfectly to all its
intended recipients,
but on the same machine I have user1@domain that is suppose to map to
user1@domain,user2@domain but it does not.
I have looked at the virtual_alias_map setting and executed the sql
query m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 23, 2011, at 11:52 PM, Etienne Pretorius wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I have a email address say staff@domain that maps perfectly to all its
> intended recipients,
> but on the same machine I have user1@domain that is suppose to map to
> user1@
69 matches
Mail list logo
