Hi,
I just watched an IP address fail to be correctly resolved back to
the A record. I could resolve the IP with the the same DNS on the same
server myself.
These connection from a server is recorded by postfix as unknown for
212.89.81.105, yet an nslookup on this IP resolves back to the co
On 15/02/11 13:18, J4K wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just watched an IP address fail to be correctly resolved back to
> the A record. I could resolve the IP with the the same DNS on the same
> server myself.
>
> These connection from a server is recorded by postfix as unknown for
> 212.89.81.105, ye
* J4K :
>
> Hi,
>
> I just watched an IP address fail to be correctly resolved back to
> the A record. I could resolve the IP with the the same DNS on the same
> server myself.
>
> These connection from a server is recorded by postfix as unknown for
> 212.89.81.105, yet an nslookup on this
On 02/15/2011 01:31 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * J4K :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just watched an IP address fail to be correctly resolved back to
>> the A record. I could resolve the IP with the the same DNS on the same
>> server myself.
>>
>> These connection from a server is recorded by postfix as u
* J4K :
> > $ host 212.89.81.105
> > 105.81.89.212.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer smtp.academicjobseu.com.
> >
> > $ host smtp.academicjobseu.com.
> > smtp.academicjobseu.com has address 212.89.81.106
> >
> > 212.89.81.105 != 212.89.81.106
> >
> # host 212.89.81.105
> 105.81.89.212.in-addr.arpa
On 02/15/2011 02:00 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * J4K :
>
>>> $ host 212.89.81.105
>>> 105.81.89.212.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer smtp.academicjobseu.com.
>>>
>>> $ host smtp.academicjobseu.com.
>>> smtp.academicjobseu.com has address 212.89.81.106
>>>
>>> 212.89.81.105 != 212.89.81.106
>>>
>
FYI,
I have changed the warnings from the code that implements
forward-confirmed reverse DNS (FCRDNS).
When the "reverse" name has no IP address:
hostname foo.example.com does not resolve to address 1.2.3.4:
host not found, try again
When the "reverse" has some address but not the expec
How can this happen?
The address "mailer-dae...@plancompany.at" does not exist
but if checked from barracuda SPF postfix answers with valid?
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Datum: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:30:11 +0100 (CET)
Von: Mail Delivery System
An
I went live with my postscreen blocking mail, after some time of
non-blocking while watching logs. Here's a discussion of those
results (both non-blocking and blocking.) I've singled out some of
the items which interested me; perhaps they will interest you as
well. (Possibly all old-hat to the
i have solved this problem with some subqueries and
the limit 1 is needed for MySQL < 5.5 because 5.1
meant that somewhere are more than one row returned
from a subquery
recipient_canonical_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-rewritedomains.cf
[root@mail:/etc/postfix]$ cat /etc/postfix/mysql-rewrited
Reindl Harald:
> How can this happen?
>
> The address "mailer-dae...@plancompany.at" does not exist
> but if checked from barracuda SPF postfix answers with valid?
Postfix SENDS mail from mailer-daemon, therefore Postfix ACCEPTS
mail to mailer-daemon.
When the mailer-daemon alias does not exist
He does not send because it is rewritten and i see
no reason for don't verify an hand of targets
especially if they bounce finally
I just added "mailer-daemon@" -> "postmas...@thelounge.net"
on dbmail side a few minutes ago to avoid backscattering but
that should not be needed
_
s
I have two issues that I believe are connected so I'm putting them into one
submission to the list:
ISSUE 1
I want to forward root's mail to a local user called mike. The user's email
address is m...@ascendency.net and is a legitimate user on the system, b
Reindl Harald:
> I just added "mailer-daemon@" -> "postmas...@thelounge.net"
That would be a terrible mistake, since it aliases EVERYONE ELSES
domain too.
Remove this nonsense.
Wietse
Am 15.02.2011 19:07, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Reindl Harald:
>> I just added "mailer-daemon@" -> "postmas...@thelounge.net"
>
> That would be a terrible mistake
no, it would not
> since it aliases EVERYONE ELSESm domain too
this is what it should do and what postmaster@, hostmaster@ and
abuse@
I have a server running postfix on port 25 and a secondary mail
platform listening on port 2525. I have tried many combinations of
settings but keep getting:
Feb 12 08:34:43 server1 postfix/smtp[11104]: 19183EB01F0:
to=, relay=none, delay=6.9, delays=6.9/0.01/0/0,
dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail
Reindl Harald:
> >> I just added "mailer-daemon@" -> "postmas...@thelounge.net"
Including mailer-dae...@porcupine.org -> postmas...@thelounge.net.
Wietse
Dave Jones:
> I have a server running postfix on port 25 and a secondary mail
> platform listening on port 2525. I have tried many combinations of
> settings but keep getting:
>
> Feb 12 08:34:43 server1 postfix/smtp[11104]: 19183EB01F0:
> to=, relay=none, delay=6.9, delays=6.9/0.01/0/0,
> dsn=5.
Am 15.02.2011 19:36, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Reindl Harald:
I just added "mailer-daemon@" -> "postmas...@thelounge.net"
>
> Including mailer-dae...@porcupine.org -> postmas...@thelounge.net
Check your mails after greylisting :-)
These Forwards on the dbmail-side and as long postfix
has "p
First off I am still a bit green on this stuff.
Both my servers are multi-homed, server A which runs Postfix is
configured -> eth0 :n.n.n.186 and eth1:n.n.n.187.
The host name for this server is mail.domain.tld which points to n.n.n.187.
Up until last Friday we did not have any problems. On
Hi,
I have a sender that is trying to send mail to one of our recipients,
but it is being rejected because it is a message/partial content type:
/^Content-(Disposition|Type):\s+.*?message\/partial\b/ REJECT
I pulled this from the jimsun antispam page. Is this still necessary?
If so, how would
Is there a way of getting a log entry that documents when Postfix is
trying to actually deliver a mail?
Something along the lines "it's in the active queue, and Postfix is about
to create|reuse an (S|L)MTP connection to whatever destination it deems
to be correct"
Why am I interested in this?
ba
On 2/15/2011 1:23 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
I have a sender that is trying to send mail to one of our recipients,
but it is being rejected because it is a message/partial content type:
/^Content-(Disposition|Type):\s+.*?message\/partial\b/ REJECT
I pulled this from the jimsun antispam page. Is this
On 02/15/2011 07:07 PM, Mike Loiterman wrote:
I have two issues that I believe are connected so I'm putting them into one
submission to the list:
ISSUE 1
I want to forward root's mail to a local user called mike. The user's email
address is m...@ascendenc
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> Is there a way of getting a log entry that documents when Postfix is
> trying to actually deliver a mail?
The queue manager connects to the UNIX-domain socket for a particular
delivery agent such as smtp(8) or local(8), and waits for a response
from a delivery agent that it is
On Feb 15, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 02/15/2011 07:07 PM, Mike Loiterman wrote:
>> I have two issues that I believe are connected so I'm putting them into one
>> submission to the list:
>>
>>
>> ISSUE 1
>>
>> I want to forward root's mail
On 02/15/2011 10:56 PM, Mike Loiterman wrote:
On Feb 15, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 02/15/2011 07:07 PM, Mike Loiterman wrote:
I have two issues that I believe are connected so I'm putting them into one
submission to the list:
ISSUE 1
==
Le 15/02/2011 07:36, Per-Erik Persson a écrit :
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:52:42 -0600, Stan Hoeppner
> wrote:
>> Per-Erik Persson put forth on 2/14/2011 4:17 PM:
>>> I have recently found out the beuty of restriction classes.
>>> So to reject senders from certain sites that usually misspell their
>
* Wietse Venema :
> Ralf Hildebrandt:
> > Is there a way of getting a log entry that documents when Postfix is
> > trying to actually deliver a mail?
>
> The queue manager connects to the UNIX-domain socket for a particular
> delivery agent such as smtp(8) or local(8), and waits for a response
> f
Le 15/02/2011 20:23, Alex a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I have a sender that is trying to send mail to one of our recipients,
> but it is being rejected because it is a message/partial content type:
>
> /^Content-(Disposition|Type):\s+.*?message\/partial\b/ REJECT
>
can you find out (and report) how the
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> > Once a delivery agent responds, it receives the delivery request,
> > and that is the start of delivery. You can see this only by turning
> > on verbose logging.
>
> OK, thought so.
>
> > The delivery request contains among many things hints whether to
> > try to save/reus
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:33:58PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > Use multiple instances, and filtered mail will not share the
> > queue with unfiltered mail, so you know exactly why it is in
> > an active queue.
>
> Oh, it's a prequeuing filter, so everything is already filtered.
Then all t
On 02/15/2011 08:21 PM, John wrote:
First off I am still a bit green on this stuff.
Both my servers are multi-homed, server A which runs Postfix is
configured -> eth0 :n.n.n.186 and eth1:n.n.n.187.
The host name for this server is mail.domain.tld which points to
n.n.n.187.
Up until last Fr
Victor Duchovni:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 08:24:14AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > In the SMTP server, this could be logged as:
> >
> > QUEUEID: client=foo.example.com, tls=whatever
> >
> > That line is logged whenever the Postfix SMTP server opens a mail
> > delivery transaction.
>
>
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 07:28:57PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Victor Duchovni:
> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 08:24:14AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > > In the SMTP server, this could be logged as:
> > >
> > > QUEUEID: client=foo.example.com, tls=whatever
> > >
> > > That line is logg
On Feb 15, 2011, at 4:08 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 02/15/2011 10:56 PM, Mike Loiterman wrote:
>> On Feb 15, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 02/15/2011 07:07 PM, Mike Loiterman wrote:
>>>
I have two issues that I believe are connected so I'm putting them into
On 2/15/2011 7:07 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 02/15/2011 08:21 PM, John wrote:
First off I am still a bit green on this stuff.
Both my servers are multi-homed, server A which runs Postfix is
configured -> eth0 :n.n.n.186 and eth1:n.n.n.187.
The host name for this server is mail.domain.tld w
37 matches
Mail list logo
