Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 20.01.2011 12:29, schrieb Christian Roessner:
>
>> Why adding a contact form? If a postmaster really does his/her job and scans
>> the logs, finds your assistance info and enters the website, don't you think
>> the same admin is also able to write a mail to you (postmas
Am 21.01.2011 02:18, schrieb Vince Wang:
> Hi,
>
> We are using postfix to send html version newsletter, and we found that the
> postfix(?) adds spaces into the body.
>
>
>
> The message body is saved in database so we can preview it to make sure it is
> right.
>
>
>
> If the space is add
Hello
Would it be possible to delay the arrival of some particular addresses ?
( ala greylisting but only for a list of addresses )
Thanks a lot
Frank Bonnet:
> Hello
>
> Would it be possible to delay the arrival of some particular addresses ?
> ( ala greylisting but only for a list of addresses )
This requires a Milter or policy plugin.
Wietse
On 01/21/2011 12:47 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Frank Bonnet:
Hello
Would it be possible to delay the arrival of some particular addresses ?
( ala greylisting but only for a list of addresses )
This requires a Milter or policy plugin.
Wietse
hello
could you recommend one ?
thank you W
Hi,
>>> Would it be possible to delay the arrival of some particular addresses ?
>>> ( ala greylisting but only for a list of addresses )
>> This requires a Milter or policy plugin.
you can use postgrey and a (pcre-) map, which triggers a restriction_class
Not sure, if you want it for sender or
On 01/21/2011 01:58 PM, Christian Roessner wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible to delay the arrival of some particular addresses ?
( ala greylisting but only for a list of addresses )
This requires a Milter or policy plugin.
you can use postgrey and a (pcre-) map, which triggers a restriction_cla
I am trying to figure out a way to configure our postfix relay server
to send to different relays for the same domain.
All our hosts are configured to use relay.abc.com
domaine name=abc.com
in aliases file root is directed to an email adress ex root: whatever.abc.com
I need to be able to redirect
Hello postfix-users,
I want to tie my users to their email addresses using the
smtpd_sender_login_maps and the reject_sender_login_mismatch parameter. I
have activated the settings in main.cf and it is working as far as I can
tell from the mail.log. I am watching the reject_warnings.
The followin
sender_dependent_relayhost_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-sender_relay_hosts.cf
[root@mail:~]$ cat /etc/postfix/mysql-sender_relay_hosts.cf
user = dbmailro
password = *
dbname = dbmail
hosts= unix:/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock
query= select transport from dbma_sender_relay where ema
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:12:32AM +0100, Mikael Bak wrote:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
> > Am 20.01.2011 12:29, schrieb Christian Roessner:
> >
> >> Why adding a contact form? If a postmaster really does
> >> his/her job and scans the logs, finds your assistance info
> >> and enters the website, don't
Frank Bonnet:
> On 01/21/2011 12:47 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Frank Bonnet:
> >> Hello
> >>
> >> Would it be possible to delay the arrival of some particular addresses ?
> >> ( ala greylisting but only for a list of addresses )
> > This requires a Milter or policy plugin.
> >
> > Wietse
> he
/dev/rob0:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:12:32AM +0100, Mikael Bak wrote:
> > Reindl Harald wrote:
> > > Am 20.01.2011 12:29, schrieb Christian Roessner:
> > >
> > >> Why adding a contact form? If a postmaster really does
> > >> his/her job and scans the logs, finds your assistance info
> > >> and
/dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:12:32AM +0100, Mikael Bak wrote:
>> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Am 20.01.2011 12:29, schrieb Christian Roessner:
>>>
Why adding a contact form? If a postmaster really does
his/her job and scans the logs, finds your assistance info
and enters
Hello All,
I'm finding this entry a few times with a godaddy server:
Jan 20 14:35:50 houston postfix/smtpd[19267]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
gateway01.websitewelcome.com[67.18.53.19]: 451 4.3.5 Server configuration
problem; from= to= proto=SMTP
helo=
Is this 451 4.3.5 from their server ha
Jack:
> Hello All,
>
> I'm finding this entry a few times with a godaddy server:
>
> Jan 20 14:35:50 houston postfix/smtpd[19267]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> gateway01.websitewelcome.com[67.18.53.19]: 451 4.3.5 Server configuration
> problem; from= to= proto=SMTP
> helo=
>
> Is this 451 4.3.5 fro
postscreen_bare_newline_wait = time that must be waited in between NEW
connection state and the reconnect, for example, 20m before the
connection is considered from a normal smtp server
This is how postscreen_bare_newline works, right? It assumes that
spammers only try to connect once when,
With 2.7 and prior, we would use -o content_filter under the first
transport to check for viruses and then pipe to spamassassin:
# line 5 of master.cf
#smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
# -o content_filter=scan:[127.0.0.1]:10025
# -o smtpd_authorized_xf
On 1/21/2011 10:26 AM, Jerrale G wrote:
postscreen_bare_newline_wait = time that must be waited in
between NEW connection state and the reconnect, for example,
20m before the connection is considered from a normal smtp server
I don't see any such parameter. Are you referring to
postscreen_ba
> -Original Message-
> From: Wietse Venema [mailto:wie...@porcupine.org]
> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 10:56 AM
> To: Jack
> Cc: Postfix
> Subject: Re: problem with log file entry
>
> Jack:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I'm finding this entry a few times with a godaddy server:
> >
> > Jan 20 1
On 1/21/2011 12:05 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/21/2011 10:26 AM, Jerrale G wrote:
postscreen_bare_newline_wait = time that must be waited in
between NEW connection state and the reconnect, for example,
20m before the connection is considered from a normal smtp server
I don't see any such param
Jerrale G:
> I explained why it is needed, as the bare_newline is a good idea and the
> same principal we used about 4 years ago, before we moved to postfix. it
> is to deter bottlers, on the idea that bottlers and spammers with non
> rfc-complian smtp bots only try to connect one time. However
Jack:
> I see this particular warning:
> Jan 20 14:35:50 houston postfix/smtpd[19267]: warning: problem talking to
> server private/policy: Connection timed out
>
> So in order the related connection looks like this:
> Jan 20 14:35:50 houston postfix/smtpd[19267]: warning: problem talking to
> ser
Jerrale G:
> With 2.7 and prior, we would use -o content_filter under the first
> transport to check for viruses and then pipe to spamassassin:
> # line 5 of master.cf
> #smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
> # -o content_filter=scan:[127.0.0.1]:10025
> #
On 1/21/2011 10:39 AM, Jerrale G wrote:
With 2.7 and prior, we would use -o content_filter under the
first transport to check for viruses and then pipe to
spamassassin:
# line 5 of master.cf
#smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
# -o content_filter=scan:[127.0.0.1]:10025
# -o smtpd_authorized_xforward_hosts
On 1/21/2011 12:41 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jerrale G:
I explained why it is needed, as the bare_newline is a good idea and the
same principal we used about 4 years ago, before we moved to postfix. it
is to deter bottlers, on the idea that bottlers and spammers with non
rfc-complian smtp bots on
On 1/21/2011 12:54 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/21/2011 10:39 AM, Jerrale G wrote:
With 2.7 and prior, we would use -o content_filter under the
first transport to check for viruses and then pipe to
spamassassin:
# line 5 of master.cf
#smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
# -o content_filter=scan:[127.0.0.1]:
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 12:45 PM
> To: Postfix users
> Subject: Re: problem with log file entry
>
> Jack:
> > I see this particular warning:
> > Jan
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 02:30:22PM +0100, Timo Veith wrote:
> I want to tie my users to their email addresses using the
> smtpd_sender_login_maps and the reject_sender_login_mismatch parameter. I
> have activated the settings in main.cf and it is working as far as I can
> tell from the mail.log. I
Hello All,
I am working on cleaning up errors from my different postfix servers and
have come across this error:
postfix/smtpd[19639]: warning: problem talking to server private/policy:
Success
It's a warning so I know it's not crucial, but I want all that cleaned up if
I can.
I have verifi
On Jan 21, 2011, at 9:14 AM, Jerrale G wrote:
> time at random intervals, usually a time more or less than a real,
> "accredited" smtp server would wait before retrying delivery. So, we need a
> postscreen_bare_newline_minwait and postscreen_bare_newline_maxwait, which
> would be the minimum a
2011/1/21 Victor Duchovni :
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 02:30:22PM +0100, Timo Veith wrote:
>
>> I want to tie my users to their email addresses using the
>> smtpd_sender_login_maps and the reject_sender_login_mismatch parameter. I
>> have activated the settings in main.cf and it is working as far as
On 1/21/2011 4:16 PM, Will Fong wrote:
On Jan 21, 2011, at 9:14 AM, Jerrale G wrote:
time at random intervals, usually a time more or less than a real,
"accredited" smtp server would wait before retrying delivery. So, we
need a postscreen_bare_newline_minwait and
postscreen_bare_newline_maxw
Jack:
> Hello All,
>
> I am working on cleaning up errors from my different postfix servers and
> have come across this error:
>
> postfix/smtpd[19639]: warning: problem talking to server private/policy:
> Success
Apparently, postfix sends a query to the policy server, but the
policy server clos
Hello,
any one can help me what is wrong with my restriction ?I use postfix 2.7.2
First i see my helo restriction is not showed with postconf -n, here is it:
alias_database = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
broken_sasl_auth_client
* Condor :
> smtpd_helo_restriction =
smtpd_helo_restriction**S**
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962
ralf.hild
Hello,
i have postfix 2.7.2 and i have problem with restrictions. I setup
smtpd_recipient_restrictions here is my main.cf config file:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
check_helo_access hash:/etc/postfix/helo_checks,
check_sender_access hash:/et
> * Condor :
>
>> smtpd_helo_restriction =
>
> smtpd_helo_restriction**S**
>
> --
> Ralf Hildebrandt
> Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
> Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
> Campus Benjamin Franklin
> Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
> Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 3
On 1/21/2011 11:39 AM, Jerrale G wrote:
With 2.7 and prior, we would use -o content_filter under the first
transport to check for viruses and then pipe to spamassassin:
# line 5 of master.cf
#smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
# -o content_filter=scan:[127.0.0.
Jerrale G:
> Thanks to Wietse and Noel for their help; however, what is this about?
>
> NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from [x.x.x.x]:59439: 550 5.5.1 Protocol error;
The explanation is the logfile, right before this.
The description of those messages (DNSBL, PREGREET, etc.) is in
the POSTSCREEN_README f
On 1/21/2011 5:08 PM, Condor wrote:
Hello,
i have postfix 2.7.2 and i have problem with restrictions. I setup
smtpd_recipient_restrictions here is my main.cf config file:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
check_helo_access hash:/etc/postfix/he
On 1/21/2011 7:18 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jerrale G:
Thanks to Wietse and Noel for their help; however, what is this about?
NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from [x.x.x.x]:59439: 550 5.5.1 Protocol error;
The explanation is the logfile, right before this.
The description of those messages (DNSBL, PREGR
I've been somewhat satisfied with the config I've had in place for a
while, but I thought it wouldn't hurt to have the experts take a look
and see if I've fubared something. Would the preferred method be a
postconf -n or snippets from main.cf?
On 1/21/2011 6:57 PM, Jerrale G wrote:
On 1/21/2011 7:18 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jerrale G:
Thanks to Wietse and Noel for their help; however, what is
this about?
NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from [x.x.x.x]:59439: 550 5.5.1
Protocol error;
The explanation is the logfile, right before this.
The des
On 01/21/2011 04:56 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 1/21/2011 5:08 PM, Condor wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> i have postfix 2.7.2 and i have problem with restrictions. I setup
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions here is my main.cf config file:
>>
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>>permit_mynetworks,
>>perm
On 1/21/2011 7:11 PM, Walter Pinto wrote:
I've been somewhat satisfied with the config I've had in place for a
while, but I thought it wouldn't hurt to have the experts take a look
and see if I've fubared something. Would the preferred method be a
postconf -n or snippets from main.cf?
You're we
On 1/21/2011 7:13 PM, Mike Morris wrote:
On 01/21/2011 04:56 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/21/2011 5:08 PM, Condor wrote:
Hello,
i have postfix 2.7.2 and i have problem with restrictions. I setup
smtpd_recipient_restrictions here is my main.cf config file:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
perm
On 01/21/2011 05:25 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 1/21/2011 7:13 PM, Mike Morris wrote:
>> On 01/21/2011 04:56 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>>> On 1/21/2011 5:08 PM, Condor wrote:
Hello,
i have postfix 2.7.2 and i have problem with restrictions. I setup
smtpd_recipient_restrictions here i
Thanks Noel. Let me know if I'm missing anything. This server is
supposed to act just as a relay.
postconf -n
alias_maps =
anvil_rate_time_unit = 180s
body_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/body_checks
bounce_size_limit = 1500
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directo
On 1/21/2011 8:25 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/21/2011 7:13 PM, Mike Morris wrote:
On 01/21/2011 04:56 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/21/2011 5:08 PM, Condor wrote:
Hello,
i have postfix 2.7.2 and i have problem with restrictions. I setup
smtpd_recipient_restrictions here is my main.cf config file:
Walter Pinto put forth on 1/21/2011 7:42 PM:
> Thanks Noel. Let me know if I'm missing anything. This server is
> supposed to act just as a relay.
It sure would read a lot easier if you didn't manually declare all those default
settings. Which Linux distro is this? Whoever packages Postfix with
CentOS 5.5
mail_version = 2.3.3
On 1/21/2011 8:12 PM, Jerrale G wrote:
...
reject_unauth_destination. Also, as an anti-openrelay
failsafe, you should put "OK 250 custom message here" instead
of "permit 250 custom message".
No, OK and permit are the same.
Technically, OK is an access map result, permit is a
smtpd_*_restrict
Hi
Im running postix 2.7 on a ubuntu 10.04 lts server. it is configured to
use smtp-auth and uses dovecots sasl. My clients connect to the server
using TLS setting.my issue is that when a client sends a mail it takes
around 15-20 seconds to make the connection and send the mail. Can I
tweak t
On 1/21/2011 7:42 PM, Walter Pinto wrote:
Thanks Noel. Let me know if I'm missing anything. This server is
supposed to act just as a relay.
postconf -n
alias_maps =
anvil_rate_time_unit = 180s
body_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/body_checks
bounce_size_limit = 1500
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
On 1/21/2011 9:11 PM, Janantha Marasinghe wrote:
Hi
Im running postix 2.7 on a ubuntu 10.04 lts server. it is
configured to use smtp-auth and uses dovecots sasl. My clients
connect to the server using TLS setting.my issue is that when
a client sends a mail it takes around 15-20 seconds to make
t
Thanks Noel, I will make the suggested changes along with cleaning out
the defaults. As far as the check policy goes, I shouldnt have any
issues moving it on this server because all I have enabled is HELO and
SPF checking. Now on my SMTP server, I have to have it before or else
the quota checking d
On 1/21/2011 9:46 PM, Walter Pinto wrote:
Thanks Noel, I will make the suggested changes along with cleaning out
the defaults. As far as the check policy goes, I shouldnt have any
issues moving it on this server because all I have enabled is HELO and
SPF checking. Now on my SMTP server, I have to
I used the following command to determine what needed to be removed
from my main.cf:
postconf -d > defaultcfg && postconf -n > customcfg && perl -ne 'print
if ($seen{$_} .= @ARGV) =~ /10$/' customcfg defaultcfg
Then I made the suggested changes and I'm left with:
anvil_rate_time_unit = 180s
bod
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 20:57:18 -0800, Walter Pinto wrote:
> I used the following command to determine what needed to be removed
> from my main.cf:
>
> postconf -d > defaultcfg && postconf -n > customcfg && perl -ne 'print
> if ($seen{$_} .= @ARGV) =~ /10$/' customcfg defaultcfg
FWIW, an untested
Hello,
Thanks a lot for your help, would you please tell me in order to achieve as
I said below, does it requires to maintain the local database (username
and password of email accounts) in sql database or in a flat file,
Regards
Ejaz
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfi
On 12/28/2010 4:19 AM, email builder wrote:
Hello,
I might need to learn how to write a milter that tries to divert outgoing
messages (so a smtp/client milter) that have been sent with
smtp_tls_security_level = encrypt but failed because the destination server
doesn't support STARTTLS (I underst
Sahil,
I tested your command and it worked, thanks for that.
> On 1/21/2011 5:08 PM, Condor wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> i have postfix 2.7.2 and i have problem with restrictions. I setup
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions here is my main.cf config file:
>>
>>
>
> Your RBL list is a mess. Several of the lists you are
> querying are dead -- securitysage, wirehub, ea
64 matches
Mail list logo
