I use Postfix client on a Centos 5.5 Trixbox. Mail messages (voicemail
notification) send to my password secured mailserver with Exim are
refused. When I decode the used login credentials I see that only the
first 14 characters of the username are used. My sasl_password looks
like (yes i have c
The client is not properly encoding the credentials, what SASL
Mechanism is selected?
-Dieter
Hello Dieter,
Thanks for the reply.
The output of postconf -A is cyrus. I tried to login with Tls and in
auth plain (here I was able to retrieve the password).
If you need more info please let me k
On 29-12-10 09:51, Rob van Dam wrote:
I use Postfix client on a Centos 5.5 Trixbox. Mail messages (voicemail
notification) send to my password secured mailserver with Exim are
refused. When I decode the used login credentials I see that only the
first 14 characters of the username are used. My
hi all
how can i get (trap) spam messages recd by my mail users or users can send
to a particular email-id the messages that they consider spam so that i can
make these messages available to spamassassin for learning
appreciate the guidance
-bharathan
Am Wed, 29 Dec 2010 10:08:24 +0100
schrieb Rob van Dam :
> > The client is not properly encoding the credentials, what SASL
> > Mechanism is selected?
> >
> > -Dieter
> Hello Dieter,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> The output of postconf -A is cyrus. I tried to login with Tls and in
> auth plain
So your login is based on cyrus-sasl libraries and mechanism PLAIN, the
mechanism PLAIN requires three arguments,\0\0,
if no authorization is requested, the authentication string has to be
set twice and the whole string has to be base64 hashed. something like
this one:
Zm9vAGZvbwBiYXI=
just d
On 26 November 2010 12:08, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> snip
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>> check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/maps/internal_networks,
>
> This potentially dangerous restriction might contain permit actions.
> See SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html#danger for the danger. (In case you
> wond
Le 29/12/2010 12:06, Mauro a écrit :
> On 26 November 2010 12:08, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
>
>> snip
>>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>>> check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/maps/internal_networks,
>>
>> This potentially dangerous restriction might contain permit actions.
>> See SMTPD_ACCESS_READM
Am Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:50:53 +0100
schrieb Rob van Dam :
>
> > So your login is based on cyrus-sasl libraries and mechanism PLAIN,
> > the mechanism PLAIN requires three
> > arguments,\0\0, if no authorization is
> > requested, the authentication string has to be set twice and the
> > whole strin
On 2010-12-29 Joan Moreau wrote:
> Well, I am surprised by the tone of those emails.
I, on the other hand, am very surprised, how you're consistently avoid
giving this list any details about your configuration or your actual
problem.
Please either supply the information you've been asked for (se
Le 29/12/2010 12:38, Ansgar Wiechers a écrit :
> On 2010-12-29 Joan Moreau wrote:
>> Well, I am surprised by the tone of those emails.
>
> I, on the other hand, am very surprised, how you're consistently avoid
> giving this list any details about your configuration or your actual
> problem.
>
>
This cut off identity string reminds me of the userID restriction to 7
characters on older Linux systems, something weird is going on on your
system.
-Dieter
I did post a message on the Trixbox forum too. Perhaps other Trixbox
users have the same problems as I have. How bad is it to use the pos
Am Wed, 29 Dec 2010 13:04:40 +0100
schrieb Rob van Dam :
> > This cut off identity string reminds me of the userID restriction
> > to 7 characters on older Linux systems, something weird is going on
> > on your system.
> >
> > -Dieter
> >
> I did post a message on the Trixbox forum too. Perhaps ot
Rob van Dam:
> I use Postfix client on a Centos 5.5 Trixbox. Mail messages (voicemail
> notification) send to my password secured mailserver with Exim are
> refused. When I decode the used login credentials I see that only the
> first 14 characters of the username are used. My sasl_password look
Hello,
I was wondering if it is possible to 'include' the contents of a file in
the mysql*.cf map files (although I guess if you can with these you can
with others)...
The reason I ask is, it would be nice when changing auth databases
(which I'm doing now), to just edit one file that contains the
I've set up a mailserver with postfix, dovecot, amavis and spamassassin.
Everything has been up and running for a year now until I noticed my
spamfilter wasn't performing as it should; spam mails sent to a normal
user were getting the right treatment and ended up in Spam-box, whereas
the same mail
On 12/29/10 10:55 AM, K bharathan wrote:
hi all
how can i get (trap) spam messages recd by my mail users or users can
send to a particular email-id the messages that they consider spam so
that i can make these messages available to spamassassin for learning
That's not directly related to, o
On 12/29/10 2:44 PM, Philip Van Pelt wrote:
I've set up a mailserver with postfix, dovecot, amavis and spamassassin.
Everything has been up and running for a year now until I noticed my
spamfilter wasn't performing as it should; spam mails sent to a normal
user were getting the right treatment an
But I have no " car to fix" . What is that story about ?
Now, I did
not rule out anything in any email.
Can you just tell me how to put
the mailing queue in a DB (mysql database in my case) ?
On Wed, 29 Dec
2010 18:04:45 +1100, James Gray wrote:
> On 29/12/2010, at 4:02 PM,
Joan Moreau wr
On 12/29/10 4:14 PM, Joan Moreau wrote:
But I have no " car to fix" . What is that story about ?
Now, I did not rule out anything in any email.
Can you just tell me how to put the mailing queue in a DB (mysql
database in my case) ?
Exactly which part of NO YOU CAN NOT PUT THE QUEUE IN A D
I'm sending mail out through amavis for spam checking, and back in,
again. There are extra "Received:" headers being added. Is there a
way to either remove these, or customize them to "X-Received:" or
something? Amavis adds one and that's an amavis issue. Postfix adds
one coming back and that's
Back in August several people helped me with the problem linked here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg26629.html
It was almost what I needed, but I didn't completely understand what I was
asking for at the time, and the configuration is causing problems. I need to
imple
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 10:14:49 -0500, Joan Moreau wrote:
> Can you just tell me how to put
> the mailing queue in a DB (mysql database in my case) ?
you may simply deploy MySQLfs (FUSE+MySQL) if you do not mind
speeds, loads,...etc.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mysqlfs/
pgp7HNgIbhXrK.pgp
Des
On 12/29/2010 9:14 AM, Joan Moreau wrote:
Can you just tell me how to put the mailing queue in a DB
(mysql database in my case) ?
Yes, rewrite postfix to use a DB as a backend rather than a
file system. This will be a major redesign and not just a
plugin. No one else is working on such a p
Op 29/12/2010 16:13, Jeroen Geilman schreef:
On 12/29/10 2:44 PM, Philip Van Pelt wrote:
I've set up a mailserver with postfix, dovecot, amavis and spamassassin.
Everything has been up and running for a year now until I noticed my
spamfilter wasn't performing as it should; spam mails sent to a n
On 12/29/2010 10:31 AM, michael.lar...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
Back in August several people helped me with the problem
linked here:
_http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg26629.html_
It was almost what I needed, but I didn’t completely
understand what I was asking for at the tim
On 12/29/2010 10:12 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
I'm sending mail out through amavis for spam checking, and back in,
again. There are extra "Received:" headers being added. Is there a
way to either remove these, or customize them to "X-Received:" or
something? Amavis adds one and that's an amavis is
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:29:18AM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if it is possible to 'include' the contents of a file in
> the mysql*.cf map files (although I guess if you can with these you can
> with others)...
Use make(1) (and/or if you miss Sendmail's .mc files,
Le 29/12/2010 17:31, michael.lar...@wellsfargo.com a écrit :
> Back in August several people helped me with the problem linked here:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg26629.html
>
> It was almost what I needed, but I didn't completely understand what I was
> asking for
Le 29/12/2010 18:25, Philip Van Pelt a écrit :
>[snip]
> Dec 29 13:48:31 test-services amavis[11240]: (11240-02) Passed SPAM,
> -> , quarantine:
> k/spam-kEzi169drbKm.gz, Message-ID:
> <20101229124831.9def84a...@test-services.doctorvinyl.be>, mail_id:
> kEzi169drbKm, Hits: 1000.729, size: 1136, qu
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 09:23:14PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> I have built an event-driven TLS proxy for postscreen(8). This
> addresses the problem that postscreen(8) could not be used when
> SMTP clients require STARTTLS support.
>
> [...]
>
> Next on the agenda is AUTH support, and that i
Le 29/12/2010 16:07, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
> On 12/29/10 10:55 AM, K bharathan wrote:
>> hi all
>> how can i get (trap) spam messages recd by my mail users or users can
>> send to a particular email-id the messages that they consider spam so
>> that i can make these messages available to spamass
mouss schreef op wo 29-12-2010 om 19:20 [+0100]:
> Le 29/12/2010 18:25, Philip Van Pelt a écrit :
> >[snip]
> > Dec 29 13:48:31 test-services amavis[11240]: (11240-02) Passed SPAM,
> > -> , quarantine:
> > k/spam-kEzi169drbKm.gz, Message-ID:
> > <20101229124831.9def84a...@test-services.doctorvinyl
Le 29/12/2010 14:29, Charles Marcus a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if it is possible to 'include' the contents of a file in
> the mysql*.cf map files (although I guess if you can with these you can
> with others)...
>
> The reason I ask is, it would be nice when changing auth databases
>
Le 29/12/2010 19:54, Philip Van Pelt a écrit :
> mouss schreef op wo 29-12-2010 om 19:20 [+0100]:
>> Le 29/12/2010 18:25, Philip Van Pelt a écrit :
>>> [snip]
>>> Dec 29 13:48:31 test-services amavis[11240]: (11240-02) Passed SPAM,
>>> -> , quarantine:
>>> k/spam-kEzi169drbKm.gz, Message-ID:
>>> <
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 07:54:08PM +0100, Philip Van Pelt wrote:
> mouss schreef op wo 29-12-2010 om 19:20 [+0100]:
> > Le 29/12/2010 18:25, Philip Van Pelt a écrit :
[..]
> I use only one domain; t...@example.com is a normal (but virtual) user
> and al...@example.com is an alias for this same u
mouss schreef op wo 29-12-2010 om 20:01 [+0100]:
> Let me ask my question more precisely: is the _string_ after the '@'
> sign the same for both addresses? please note that I am not talking
> about delivery or virtual things. just the string.
The domain (the _string_ after the @) is exactly the sa
Dennis Guhl schreef op wo 29-12-2010 om 20:14 [+0100]:
[snip]
>
> It seems you have a condition in your sieve script which only matches
> t...@example.com but not al...@example.com.
>
Well, I thought about that one too. But as I examine the mail in my
mailbox, no X-Spam-Flag is present. So the pr
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:26:08PM +0100, Philip Van Pelt wrote:
> Dennis Guhl schreef op wo 29-12-2010 om 20:14 [+0100]:
> [snip]
> >
> > It seems you have a condition in your sieve script which only matches
> > t...@example.com but not al...@example.com.
> >
> Well, I thought about that one to
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:26:08PM +0100, Philip Van Pelt wrote:
> Dennis Guhl schreef op wo 29-12-2010 om 20:14 [+0100]:
> [snip]
> >
> > It seems you have a condition in your sieve script which only matches
> > t...@example.com but not al...@example.com.
> >
> Well, I thought about that one too
Victor Duchovni:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 09:23:14PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > I have built an event-driven TLS proxy for postscreen(8). This
> > addresses the problem that postscreen(8) could not be used when
> > SMTP clients require STARTTLS support.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Next on the
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 02:45:39PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > So, unlike the TLS proxy, the AUTH proxy (as e.g. the Cyrus saslauthd
> > service) may need to be a forking multi-process service.
>
> As long as the postscreen side is event-driven, some latency in
> AUTH support is not a problem
Le 29/12/2010 20:18, Philip Van Pelt a écrit :
> mouss schreef op wo 29-12-2010 om 20:01 [+0100]:
>> Let me ask my question more precisely: is the _string_ after the '@'
>> sign the same for both addresses? please note that I am not talking
>> about delivery or virtual things. just the string.
>
>
* Victor Duchovni :
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 09:23:14PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > I have built an event-driven TLS proxy for postscreen(8). This
> > addresses the problem that postscreen(8) could not be used when
> > SMTP clients require STARTTLS support.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Next on
* Noel Jones :
> On 12/29/2010 10:12 AM, Phil Howard wrote:
> >I'm sending mail out through amavis for spam checking, and back in,
> >again. There are extra "Received:" headers being added. Is there a
> >way to either remove these, or customize them to "X-Received:" or
> >something? Amavis adds
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 09:11:41PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> > Perhaps we can encourage better hygiene, by not offering AUTH in
> > postscreen. People who want AUTH and postscreen, can migrate their AUTH
> > users to port 587? Or is this still too much to ask of potential Postfix
> > use
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:38, Noel Jones wrote:
> In postfix, you can use a header_checks IGNORE rule to remove unwanted
> headers. Be careful that your rule only matches the exact header you want
> to remove.
As I understand header_checks, it removes only what is already in the
message. When
Le 29/12/2010 21:33, Phil Howard a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:38, Noel Jones wrote:
>
>> In postfix, you can use a header_checks IGNORE rule to remove unwanted
>> headers. Be careful that your rule only matches the exact header you want
>> to remove.
>
> As I understand header_checks,
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 03:33:43PM -0500, Phil Howard wrote:
> As I understand header_checks, it removes only what is already in the
> message.
The header_checks(5) code is implemented by cleanup(8) which processes
the message passed to it by smtpd(8). The "Received" header that
records the origi
* Victor Duchovni :
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 09:11:41PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>
> > > Perhaps we can encourage better hygiene, by not offering AUTH in
> > > postscreen. People who want AUTH and postscreen, can migrate their AUTH
> > > users to port 587? Or is this still too much to as
On 12/29/2010 2:33 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:38, Noel Jones wrote:
In postfix, you can use a header_checks IGNORE rule to remove unwanted
headers. Be careful that your rule only matches the exact header you want
to remove.
As I understand header_checks, it removes on
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 09:46:25PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> > The problem is very likely just ISP MUAs. Which ISPs still make money on
> > emai users? It seems that Gmail and the other 800lb free-email gorillas
> > have largely taken over the consumer email market. Is there in fact
> >
* Victor Duchovni :
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 09:46:25PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>
> > > The problem is very likely just ISP MUAs. Which ISPs still make money on
> > > emai users? It seems that Gmail and the other 800lb free-email gorillas
> > > have largely taken over the consumer email
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:08:15PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> > > In mobile networks, yes. And email usage is rising again, since mobile
> > > users
> > > found out the can cram more words in a mail than in a SMS.
> >
> > Do these providers combine the port 25 MX host with the port 25
>
* Victor Duchovni :
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:08:15PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>
> > > > In mobile networks, yes. And email usage is rising again, since mobile
> > > > users
> > > > found out the can cram more words in a mail than in a SMS.
> > >
> > > Do these providers combine the
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 15:43, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 03:33:43PM -0500, Phil Howard wrote:
>
>> As I understand header_checks, it removes only what is already in the
>> message.
>
> The header_checks(5) code is implemented by cleanup(8) which processes
> the message passe
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 04:29:51PM -0500, Phil Howard wrote:
> OK, sot it will apply to all headers after the instant one is added.
> Now the issue remains how to match the one just added and not others
> that existed before it ... even if those look exactly the same.
They don't look *exactly* th
Le 29/12/2010 22:29, Phil Howard a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 15:43, Victor Duchovni
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 03:33:43PM -0500, Phil Howard wrote:
>>
>>> As I understand header_checks, it removes only what is already in the
>>> message.
>>
>> The header_checks(5) code is implemen
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 16:35, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 04:29:51PM -0500, Phil Howard wrote:
>
>> OK, sot it will apply to all headers after the instant one is added.
>> Now the issue remains how to match the one just added and not others
>> that existed before it ... even
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 05:01:59PM -0500, Phil Howard wrote:
> Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
> my.mail.server (Postfix) with ESMTP id XX for
> ; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 09:23:27 -0500 (EST)
This is added locally, and is reasonably removed, if that's what
you want.
> Re
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 17:21, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 05:01:59PM -0500, Phil Howard wrote:
>
>> Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
>> my.mail.server (Postfix) with ESMTP id XX for
>> ; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 09:23:27 -0500 (EST)
>
> This is added lo
Le 29/12/2010 23:42, Phil Howard a écrit :
> [snip]
>
> It's not about preserving it, per se, but instead, it's about
> detecting any attempts along those lines. It's a test I'd rather do
> before amavis gets the mail. But that's also a larger project I'd
> prefer to avoid. It's a fallback opti
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 8:35 PM, mouss wrote:
> Le 29/12/2010 16:07, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
> > On 12/29/10 10:55 AM, K bharathan wrote:
> >> hi all
> >> how can i get (trap) spam messages recd by my mail users or users can
> >> send to a particular email-id the messages that they consider spam
63 matches
Mail list logo
