* Victor Duchovni <postfix-users@postfix.org>: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 09:46:25PM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > > > > The problem is very likely just ISP MUAs. Which ISPs still make money on > > > emai users? It seems that Gmail and the other 800lb free-email gorillas > > > have largely taken over the consumer email market. Is there in fact > > > a business incentive to offer users submission services on any port > > > (25 or 587)? > > > > In mobile networks, yes. And email usage is rising again, since mobile users > > found out the can cram more words in a mail than in a SMS. > > Do these providers combine the port 25 MX host with the port 25 > MSA? So long as the port 25 service is still just an MSA, it needs no > postscreen(8). The postscreen(8) service is for (well really against) > MX-host abusing zombies.
They do combine MTA and MSA. You are right they won't be using postscreen(8) for a while. In this case it should be okay not to implement AUTH in postscreen. p...@rick -- All technical questions asked privately will be automatically answered on the list and archived for public access unless privacy is explicitely required and justified. saslfinger (debugging SMTP AUTH): <http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/saslfinger/>
