On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 02:45:13 +0100
mouss articulated:
> Le 19/11/2010 22:22, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
> > On 11/18/2010 03:11 PM, Jerry wrote:
> >> To a point I would agree with you. I have often wondered what moron
> >> came up with certain "standards" that are now in effect.
> >
> >
> > That wo
hi
E-mail more than 889 characters on line 1 DKIM authentication error in
trouble
sendmail8.14.4 does not matter.
It is expected over the milter-mail after entering,
I think the idea of being sent from the line and then split in the process.
E-mail and entered, after the signing process (line b
vfx9as:
> hi
>
> E-mail more than 889 characters on line 1 DKIM authentication error in
> trouble
Please fix your app to stop sending insanely long lines.
Please see RFC 5321 section "4.5.3.1.6. Text Line"
The maximum total length of a text line including the is 1000
octets (not counting
Le 19/11/2010 21:14, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
Why is Postfix ignoring the alias entry for root?
First, /etc/aliases only applies to "local" domains. but OP has
mydestination =
local_transport = error:local mail delivery is disabled
Second, non fqdn addresses get "fixed" by postfix. In pa
Mac OS X 10.4.11 server "migrated" over to Mac OS X Server 10.6.
Now, Receiving e-mail into new server is almost non-existant. It seems a
lot of mail is being received by the Mail Server, but not being delivered
to the client computers.
At your mercy for some assistance thanks !
Nov 20 08:
(10/11/20 23:10), Wietse Venema wrote:
> vfx9as:
>> hi
>>
>> E-mail more than 889 characters on line 1 DKIM authentication error in
>> trouble
>
> Please fix your app to stop sending insanely long lines.
>
At present, postfix will send to the split.
Milter currently divided data, postfix will sen
On 11/20/10 8:24 AM, jayl...@lukedesign.com at jayl...@lukedesign.com wrote:
> Mac OS X 10.4.11 server "migrated" over to Mac OS X Server 10.6.
>
> Now, Receiving e-mail into new server is almost non-existant. It seems a
> lot of mail is being received by the Mail Server, but not being delivered
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Jacqui Caren-home
wrote:
> However I took a peek at the digitalriver.com website and from the content
> it does not look promising. From thier product literature, I suspect they
> have
> provided the facilities (and technology) to allow bluehornet to keep
> spammin
Hello,
I have a problem of relay access denied with postfix to deliver a mail
to one domain (only one, all other domains are ok). I ran smtpd in
verbose mode and I can see that it's the reject_unauth_destination
generic check that reply with status 2, so postfix reject the mail.
So I suspect
Ben:
> Hello,
>
> I have a problem of relay access denied with postfix to deliver a mail
> to one domain (only one, all other domains are ok). I ran smtpd in
Does the domain name match mydestination? If yes, show evidence.
Does the domain name match virtual_alias_domains? If yes, show evidence
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:57:58AM -0500, Carlos Mennens wrote:
[snip]
> So I'm done trying to ask nicely and it doesn't seem like I'm going to
> get any results so now I'd like to get back to my original question,
> what's the best way via Postfix to stop them from sending mail to my
> Postfix
Le 20/11/2010 18:26, Wietse Venema a écrit :
Ben:
Hello,
I have a problem of relay access denied with postfix to deliver a mail
to one domain (only one, all other domains are ok). I ran smtpd in
Does the domain name match mydestination? If yes, show evidence.
Does the domain name match virtu
Le 20/11/2010 18:26, Wietse Venema a écrit :
Ben:
Hello,
I have a problem of relay access denied with postfix to deliver a mail
to one domain (only one, all other domains are ok). I ran smtpd in
Does the domain name match mydestination? If yes, show evidence.
Does the domain name match virtu
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 06:49:52PM +0100, Ben wrote:
>>> I have a problem of relay access denied with postfix to deliver a mail
>>> to one domain (only one, all other domains are ok). I ran smtpd in
>>
>> Does the domain name match mydestination? If yes, show evidence.
>>
>> Does the domain name m
Le 20/11/2010 19:03, Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 06:49:52PM +0100, Ben wrote:
I have a problem of relay access denied with postfix to deliver a mail
to one domain (only one, all other domains are ok). I ran smtpd in
Does the domain name match mydestination? If yes, show
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 07:45:41PM +0100, Ben wrote:
> Thank you for your help ! The recipient domain should be configured as
> final, but is not. I think that's the problem.
>
> I joined the information you asked to avoid line breaking.
Turn off verbose logging, it is not needed, and obscures t
vfx9as:
> In 980 characters or more lines as it will split 1 postfix, and long
> lines to fill in
> Line characters sent so I do not think 980 RFC violation.
Please read RFC 5322 Section 2.2.3. Long Header Fields
Each header field is logically a single line of characters comprising
the fiel
On 11/20/2010 11:35 AM, Pete wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:57:58AM -0500, Carlos Mennens wrote:
[snip]
So I'm done trying to ask nicely and it doesn't seem like I'm going to
get any results so now I'd like to get back to my original question,
what's the best way via Postfix to stop them f
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 05:53:40PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 11/20/2010 11:35 AM, Pete wrote:
> >On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:57:58AM -0500, Carlos Mennens wrote:
> >>Can someone please tell me the recommended way to do this in Postfix?
> >>I'm sure most of you veterans have had a time where you
2010/11/21 Wietse Venema :
> vfx9as:
>> In 980 characters or more lines as it will split 1 postfix, and long
>> lines to fill in
>> Line characters sent so I do not think 980 RFC violation.
>
> Please read RFC 5322 Section 2.2.3. Long Header Fields
"Body" problem
No headers
2010/11/20 vfx9as :
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
