On 10/23/2010 4:20 PM, David Touzeau wrote:
Yes i heard about VPN but in some cases in a big environnement you
cannot play with networks and firewalls as you like.
And there is a lot of remote sites to discuss, create VPN trought all
theses remote sites is to complicated to maintain.
the same vp
Hi,
I did upgrade a mail server from postfix 2.4.5 to 2.7.1.
Unfortunately Outlook MUA is unable to send email through.
I get the following error:
Oct 26 11:34:06 sargon postfix/smtpd[23238]: connect from
unknown[192.168.14.249]
Oct 26 11:34:06 sargon postfix/smtpd[23238]: setting up TLS connec
Hi,
I have the following postfix configuration:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_unknown_client_hostname,
reject_unknown_hostname,
reject_non_fqdn_hostname,
reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname,
reject_invalid_helo_hostname,
Hi,
I have SpamAssassin integrated on my postfix mail server via 'Amavisd-new'.
The problem that I am facing is that I am receiving same email every 15 second
from same sender with same message-ID on my production mail servers, following
are my postfix logs:
"Oct 25 01:11:02 g2t0433g postfix/
Hello members,
I have a smarthost configured to relay all sent emails to @terra.com.br,
and i have a domain locally configured has a domain.local, i need to
configure logwatch to sent emails to root, but when this emails is sent
postfix sent this email to @terra.com.br, and i have domain.local
On 10/25/2010 9:38 PM, utahnix wrote:
Hello all,
This question has probably been asked on this list before, but
maybe not quite with these circumstances. I'm hoping one of
you can give me some direction.
I've got a fairly typical Postfix setup... Postfix, Cyrus
IMAP, ClamAV, SpamAssassin... all
I'm now trying to move all RBL and RHSBL checks to policyd-weight. In
policyd-weight I set "$ADD_X_HEADER = 1" and very high score so it never
match.
Then I plan to parse "X-policyd-weight" header with sieve script on
cyrus to move spam to separate imap folder. Header looks like this:
X-policyd-w
On 10/25/10 23:35, utahnix wrote:
> On 10/25/2010 9:05 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> On 10/25/2010 10:38 PM, utahnix wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> Anyway, I've set up greylisting with Postgrey to help cut down on the
>>> junk mail that I get. I've set it up with default values (deferral of
>>> 300
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Rafael Andrade
wrote:
> Hello members,
>
> I have a smarthost configured to relay all sent emails to @terra.com.br, and
> i have a domain locally configured has a domain.local, i need to configure
> logwatch to sent emails to root, but when this emails is sent post
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:40:49AM +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
> I did upgrade a mail server from postfix 2.4.5 to 2.7.1.
>
> Unfortunately Outlook MUA is unable to send email through.
>
> I get the following error:
> Oct 26 11:34:06 sargon postfix/smtpd[23238]: connect from
> unknown[192.168.14
On 10/26/2010 01:40 PM, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
Hi,
I have SpamAssassin integrated on my postfix mail server via 'Amavisd-new'.
The problem that I am facing is that I am receiving same email every 15 second
from same sender with same message-ID on my production mail servers, following
are my po
> I'm now "playing" with ssldump:
> ERROR: Length mismatch
>
> Do any of the postfix guru out there have a clue about what's going on ?
According to ssldump source code:
void pcap_cb(ptr,hdr,data)
u_char *ptr;
struct pcap_pkthdr *hdr;
u_char *data;
{
n_handler *n;
...
n=(n_ha
First of all, I'm quite satisfied with Postfix and some other opensource
products which are keeping my life better and I owe a big *THANK YOU* to
all developers etc...
Now on to my questions... I'm using Postfix MTA on some email gateways
and even though I belive I've configured maximal_queue_
On 10/26/2010 09:05 PM, Rok Potočnik wrote:
First of all, I'm quite satisfied with Postfix and some other
opensource products which are keeping my life better and I owe a big
*THANK YOU* to all developers etc...
Now on to my questions... I'm using Postfix MTA on some email gateways
and even t
Zitat von Rok Potočnik :
First of all, I'm quite satisfied with Postfix and some other
opensource products which are keeping my life better and I owe a big
*THANK YOU* to all developers etc...
Now on to my questions... I'm using Postfix MTA on some email
gateways and even though I belive
On 26.10.2010 21:08, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 10/26/2010 09:05 PM, Rok Potočnik wrote:
First of all, I'm quite satisfied with Postfix and some other
opensource products which are keeping my life better and I owe a big
*THANK YOU* to all developers etc...
Now on to my questions... I'm using Post
On 26.10.2010 21:12, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Rok Potočnik :
First of all, I'm quite satisfied with Postfix and some other
opensource products which are keeping my life better and I owe a big
*THANK YOU* to all developers etc...
Now on to my questions... I'm using Postfix MTA on so
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:40:49AM +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
> Oct 26 11:34:06 sargon postfix/smtpd[23238]: SSL_accept:SSLv3 write
> certificate request B
> Oct 26 11:34:06 sargon postfix/smtpd[23238]: SSL_accept:SSLv3 flush data
> Oct 26 11:34:06 sargon postfix/smtpd[23238]: SSL_accept error f
On 10/26/2010 09:37 PM, Rok Potočnik wrote:
On 26.10.2010 21:08, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 10/26/2010 09:05 PM, Rok Potočnik wrote:
First of all, I'm quite satisfied with Postfix and some other
opensource products which are keeping my life better and I owe a big
*THANK YOU* to all developers etc
On 26.10.2010 22:08, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Then you're probably accepting way too much mail that you shouldn't, as
the other guy said.
Even with volumes exceeding 100K per day, I don't have deferred messages.
ISP mail servers usually accept a large number of messages that most
company's mail s
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:25:32PM +0200, Rok Poto??nik wrote:
> On 26.10.2010 22:08, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>> Then you're probably accepting way too much mail that you shouldn't, as
>> the other guy said.
>> Even with volumes exceeding 100K per day, I don't have deferred messages.
>
> ISP mail se
Zitat von Rok Potočnik :
On 26.10.2010 22:08, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Then you're probably accepting way too much mail that you shouldn't, as
the other guy said.
Even with volumes exceeding 100K per day, I don't have deferred messages.
ISP mail servers usually accept a large number of messages
Hi, recently I tried to complie TLS with postfix 2.4.5 and 2.6.5 on centos
4.8 and I'm getting an error. The server that I'm trying to get TLS working
already is running postfix 2.4.5 with SASL with no issues.
When I run
make makefiles CCARGS="-DUSE_SASL_AUTH -DUSE_CYRUS_SASL -I/usr/include
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 05:03:53PM -0400, PA wrote:
> Hi, recently I tried to complie TLS with postfix 2.4.5 and 2.6.5 on centos
> 4.8 and I'm getting an error. The server that I'm trying to get TLS working
> already is running postfix 2.4.5 with SASL with no issues.
>
>
>
> When I run
>
>
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 03:48:57PM -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:40:49AM +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
> > smtpd_tls_ask_ccert = yes
>
> Consider turning this off, unless you really make use of client certs,
> the client may not have a cert, and may give up for that reas
We had an incident today where we had a user with a compromised
machine. Their email/pass made it back to some botnet which proceeded
to SASL auth to our mail servers and send numerous spam messages from
many different hosts. The spamming hosts didnt trigger our
smtpd_client_recipient_rate_limit se
greetings
How can I test my local recipient map. Im looking for something similar to a "
postmap -q us...@example.com hash:/etc/postfix/myfile "
here is my map statement.
local_recipient_maps = proxy:unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps
this doesn't work
postmap -q dva...@example.com proxy:unix:pas
Cassidy Larson:
> We had an incident today where we had a user with a compromised
> machine. Their email/pass made it back to some botnet which proceeded
> to SASL auth to our mail servers and send numerous spam messages from
> many different hosts. The spamming hosts didnt trigger our
> smtpd_clie
On 10/27/2010 02:43 AM, jeffrey j donovan wrote:
greetings
How can I test my local recipient map. Im looking for something similar to a "
postmap -q us...@example.com hash:/etc/postfix/myfile "
here is my map statement.
local_recipient_maps = proxy:unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps
this doesn't
jeffrey j donovan:
> greetings
>
> How can I test my local recipient map. Im looking for something similar to a
> " postmap -q us...@example.com hash:/etc/postfix/myfile "
>
> here is my map statement.
> local_recipient_maps = proxy:unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps
>
> this doesn't work
> postm
On Oct 26, 2010, at 8:47 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> jeffrey j donovan:
>> greetings
>>
>> How can I test my local recipient map. Im looking for something similar to a
>> " postmap -q us...@example.com hash:/etc/postfix/myfile "
>>
>> here is my map statement.
>> local_recipient_maps = proxy:u
> Cassidy Larson:
>> We had an incident today where we had a user with a compromised
>> machine. Their email/pass made it back to some botnet which proceeded
>> to SASL auth to our mail servers and send numerous spam messages from
>> many different hosts. The spamming hosts didnt trigger our
>> sm
I am trying to setup postfix to authenticate and relay message from
'traveling' users (user connecting to postfix from outside our network and
IP range). Some of our users are using Apple iPads and connecting with SALS.
Others are using TLS and are mostly Droid smartphones.
SASL is almost working
On 27/10/10 02:21, Cassidy Larson wrote:
> This got me wondering if there's any easy way to have anvil report
> stats based on the authenticated SASL username, in addition to the
> remote IP address?
>
> This would help me prevent/monitor potential addresses that are being
> used by a botnet system
On 26.10.2010 22:35, Victor Duchovni wrote:
ISP mail servers usually accept a large number of messages that most
company's mail servers reject (e.g. only accept only email sent from the
hosted domain). Unfortunately we can only limit the email till one point,
after that we must somehow work aroun
I just set up Postgrey yesterday and it works just fine.
One thing that got me thinking though was that if I have greylisting
check Before reject_rbl_client, shouldn't the rbl check be skipped if
the IP get's greylisted and Then checked with rbl when/if it passes the
greylisting? Or am I thinki
* Kory Hamzeh :
> I am trying to setup postfix to authenticate and relay message from
> 'traveling' users (user connecting to postfix from outside our network and
> IP range). Some of our users are using Apple iPads and connecting with SALS.
> Others are using TLS and are mostly Droid smartphones.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 08:45:56AM +0200, Patric Falinder wrote:
> I just set up Postgrey yesterday and it works just fine.
> One thing that got me thinking though was that if I have greylisting
> check Before reject_rbl_client, shouldn't the rbl check be skipped
> if the IP get's greylisted and Th
Henrik K skrev 2010-10-27 08:52:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 08:45:56AM +0200, Patric Falinder wrote:
I just set up Postgrey yesterday and it works just fine.
One thing that got me thinking though was that if I have greylisting
check Before reject_rbl_client, shouldn't the rbl check be skipped
if th
39 matches
Mail list logo
