p...@alt-ctrl-del.org wrote:
Hello postfix admins,
I have always placed all restrictions in smtpd_recipient_restrictions.
Over the last few days, I have been experimenting with breaking the
restrictions up into client, helo, sender, etc. I ran into something odd
(to me), when permit_mynetworks
p...@alt-ctrl-del.org:
> I take it that I am expected to bottom post here. But is it ok, if I crop
> out parts of the original message (if it's long)?
Yes.
Wietse
The firewall at one of our locations is down and we are using a cheaper
solution until it is replaced, which does not handle content filtering
as well with calls to our db at another network like the old router did
very well. So, I am trying to reroute all the mail destined for that
Postfix gat
On 8/19/2010 9:16 AM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
The firewall at one of our locations is down and we are using
a cheaper solution until it is replaced, which does not handle
content filtering as well with calls to our db at another
network like the old router did very well. So, I am trying to
rero
On 19/08/2010 16:16, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
The firewall at one of our locations is down and we are using a cheaper solution until it is replaced, which does not
handle content filtering as well with calls to our db at another network like the old router did very well. So, I am
trying to rer
On 8/19/2010 11:03 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#probe_routing
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#address_verify_transport_maps
Yes, I read both of these, I guess I just can't figure out how to
utilize these configuration options for a solu
On 8/19/2010 10:10 AM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
On 8/19/2010 11:03 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#probe_routing
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#address_verify_transport_maps
Yes, I read both of these, I guess I just can't figure out ho
On 8/19/2010 11:26 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 8/19/2010 10:10 AM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
On 8/19/2010 11:03 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#probe_routing
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#address_verify_transport_maps
Yes, I read both of
On 8/19/2010 11:08 AM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
On 8/19/2010 11:26 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 8/19/2010 10:10 AM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
On 8/19/2010 11:03 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#probe_routing
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#a
On 8/19/2010 12:52 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
Use address_verify_transport_maps in place of your transport_maps to
control the routing of the probe.
Ah, I'm just stupid then, I thought that didn't work unless you were
using transport_maps in the first place, sorry. Thanks for clearing that up.
On 8/19/2010 12:52 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
Use address_verify_transport_maps in place of your transport_maps to
control the routing of the probe.
Uhmm, I added address_verify_transport_maps, but it still is sending
verifications to the relayhost:
mx2# postconf -n
address_verify_map = btree:/v
On 8/18/2010 4:16 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 8/18/2010 3:50 PM, Daniel Prieto wrote:
Brian,
On 8/18/2010 2:17 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 8/18/2010 2:05 PM, Daniel Prieto wrote:
Hello,
I have moved from Sendmail to Postfix and eliminated Student email
accounts
On 8/19/2010 2:21 PM, Daniel Prieto wrote:
On 8/18/2010 4:16 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 8/18/2010 3:50 PM, Daniel Prieto wrote:
Brian,
On 8/18/2010 2:17 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 8/18/2010 2:05 PM, Daniel Prieto wrote:
Hello,
I have moved from Sendmail to
Out of all of the things we do to restrict spam,
the only one with a steady trickle of false positives is
the host lookup not passing reverse DNS check.
The only place I've seen which publicly talks about
the reverse DNS requirement is AOL. A huge majority
of senders are correctly configured in D
From: D G Teed
Subject: How common is reverse DNS checking?
Out of all of the things we do to restrict spam,
the only one with a steady trickle of false positives is
the host lookup not passing reverse DNS check.
reject_unknown_client_hostname = gives problems
reject_unknown_reverse_client
On 8/19/2010 2:15 PM, p...@alt-ctrl-del.org wrote:
From: D G Teed Subject: How common is reverse DNS checking?
Out of all of the things we do to restrict spam,
the only one with a steady trickle of false positives is
the host lookup not passing reverse DNS check.
reject_unknown_client_hos
Hi All,
I need to re-install a new mail server.
So I have the actual server running on and ordered a new one where I'm
installing and configuring newer softwares.
It's done and I need to move all domains and it's accounts to the newer
server.
Once there are so many gigabytes to move, I'll need to
Thanks for the responses and tip on reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
I've made the switch to that and it seems to catch many unmapped IPs.
I half suspected there was something less stringent I could go for,
and had not noticed that variant. We had only reject_unknown_client
from older Post
On 8/19/2010 2:58 PM, Ronan Lucio wrote:
Hi All,
I need to re-install a new mail server.
So I have the actual server running on and ordered a new one
where I'm installing and configuring newer softwares.
It's done and I need to move all domains and it's accounts to
the newer server.
Once there
On 8/19/2010 1:01 PM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
On 8/19/2010 12:52 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
Use address_verify_transport_maps in place of your
transport_maps to
control the routing of the probe.
Uhmm, I added address_verify_transport_maps, but it still is
sending verifications to the relayhost:
On 8/19/2010 3:40 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 8/19/2010 1:01 PM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
Uhmm, I added address_verify_transport_maps, but it still is
sending verifications to the relayhost:
Aug 19 13:27:10 mx2 postfix/smtp[88103]: 9BD9A11417F:
to=,
relay=mx1.webtent.net[208.38.145.6]:25,
On 8/19/2010 2:33 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 8/19/2010 2:21 PM, Daniel Prieto wrote:
On 8/18/2010 4:16 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 8/18/2010 3:50 PM, Daniel Prieto wrote:
Brian,
On 8/18/2010 2:17 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
On 8/18/2010 2:05 PM, D
Hi,
is there a greet_pause feature in postfix comparable with the sendmail
greet_pause feature?
For example: FEATURE(`greet_pause',5000)
Thank you.
Best regards,
Morten
Morten P.D. Stevens:
> Hi,
>
> is there a greet_pause feature in postfix comparable with the sendmail
> greet_pause feature?
>
> For example: FEATURE(`greet_pause',5000)
If you have a zombie problem, then delaying every SMTP session
is a terrible idea.
The expirimental Postfix release has a be
Quoting Noel Jones :
On 8/19/2010 2:15 PM, p...@alt-ctrl-del.org wrote:
From: D G Teed Subject: How common is reverse DNS checking?
Out of all of the things we do to restrict spam,
the only one with a steady trickle of false positives is
the host lookup not passing reverse DNS check.
re
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:30 PM
> To: Morten P.D. Stevens
> Cc: Postfix users
> Subject: Re: greet_pause feature with postfix?
>
> Morten P.D. Stev
Morten P.D. Stevens:
> is there a greet_pause feature in postfix comparable with the
> sendmail greet_pause feature?
>
> For example: FEATURE(`greet_pause',5000)
Wietse:
> If you have a zombie problem, then delaying every SMTP session
> is a terrible idea.
>
> The expirimental Postfix release has
I am using postfix with amavisd-new and i am new to mail server.
I don't know i am asking a silly question or not... but pls help.
Is there a way to block some users from the same domain to send mails to
particular group with in that domain.
Example: I don't want a...@example.com, b...@example.com
28 matches
Mail list logo
